Never. http://gbatemp.net/topic/317948-xbox-live-hackers-selling-stolen-accounts-on-foreign-auction-sites/page__st__30Switch over to Microsoft as they understand online gaming better than all other console manufactures. By the way, I totally agree with you, but not totally. I think MOST games should have online multi-player.
His complaint was when portable games that have multiplayer only have local multiplayer. That's a vlid complaint, as the multiplayer exists, but is heavily restricted.I also agree that the 3DS needs more online, but I don't think his examples were good. Plus, no offense or anything but this sounds like something a Xbox fanboy would say. Not EVERY game needs online. (But Starfox could have used it)
His complaint was when portable games that have multiplayer only have local multiplayer. That's a vlid complaint, as the multiplayer exists, but is heavily restricted.I also agree that the 3DS needs more online, but I don't think his examples were good. Plus, no offense or anything but this sounds like something a Xbox fanboy would say. Not EVERY game needs online. (But Starfox could have used it)
You're the only person to mention any other system here... The "I don't agree so he must be a fanboy" shit will get you banned eventually.
Look... why you did it isn't really important. That won't matter once things take off. The problem is you're claiming that somebody sounds like a fanboy because you disagree with them. That kind of accusation starts shit, and you should be careful not to do it because people WILL misread that sort of thing.I'm a bit confused how I can agree with someone yet still be attacked. I never had the issue of not having anyone to play with so I can kind of understand that point but still I don't think Four Swords would have been fun online (specially with all the indirect ways you can kill your partner, and the Rupee penalty has never stopped me from doing it.) And there's many other games that didn't need it. Therefore I think to say something like "All Multiplayer games should have online." is something that someone who mostly/only plays online (In this case a Xbox fanny) would say.
Look... why you did it isn't really important. That won't matter once things take off. The problem is you're claiming that somebody sounds like a fanboy because you disagree with them. That kind of accusation starts shit, and you should be careful not to do it because people WILL misread that sort of thing.I'm a bit confused how I can agree with someone yet still be attacked. I never had the issue of not having anyone to play with so I can kind of understand that point but still I don't think Four Swords would have been fun online (specially with all the indirect ways you can kill your partner, and the Rupee penalty has never stopped me from doing it.) And there's many other games that didn't need it. Therefore I think to say something like "All Multiplayer games should have online." is something that someone who mostly/only plays online (In this case a Xbox fanny) would say.
Well I assumed it was obvious that insults start arguments...Why didn't you just SAY people could misread it rather then attack me about sharing my opinion?