Donald Trump and Bill Clinton attended orgy parties with underage girls.

[The Catboy]

Definitly creepy as fuck. I does lack context though. Did he linger around or step out after the I've seen it all before remark? I would wager he didn't try hanging around, considering there were another 11 girls there who don't recall seeing him there.

Peak mental gymnastics. Ignores everything and only latches on the smallest crumbs
You read nothing else

Or even the fact that this is a repeat pattern
https://people.com/politics/donald-trump-howard-stern-interviews-crude-comments-women/
Of course, you also ignored ALL OF OTHER ARTICLES.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politi...eepiness-while-he-owned-miss-universe-191860/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations
https://19thnews.org/2023/10/donald-trump-associates-sexual-misconduct-allegations/
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/list-trumps-accusers-allegations-sexual-misconduct/story?id=51956410
https://www.axios.com/2024/10/28/trump-sexual-misconduct-allegations-women
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjgl/vol27/iss1/3/
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/assault-allegations-donald-trump-recapped

It’s impressive just how you little you care about women and children to favor an old man who has bragged about his sexual assaults before

 

[titan_tim]

Sure. Does that one name Trump?.

Unsure since it's been heavily redacted. There are some names that get through like Epstein, Maxwell, Leon Black, and Jean Luc Brunei. So those people should be prosecuted (and Maxwell moved out of the club fed prison to a proper prison)?

Just setting the stage for if other evidence comes out where it directly names Trump. Although Trump has been named by victims giving first hand sworn testimonies, which you'd think would mean even more than a diary.

 

[urherenow]

Peak mental gymnastics. Ignores everything and only latches on the smallest crumbs
You read nothing else
View attachment 554633View attachment 554634
Or even the fact that this is a repeat pattern
https://people.com/politics/donald-trump-howard-stern-interviews-crude-comments-women/
Of course, you also ignored ALL OF OTHER ARTICLES.
It’s impressive just how you little you care about women and children to favor an old man who has bragged about his sexual assaults before

Post automatically merged: Feb 3, 2026

He never bragged about assaulting a child. I never said he wasn't a creep. I only said I don't think he's a pedo, and have yet to see a shred of evidence that he had anything do with that stuff, with Epstein. AI doesn't seem to either:

 

[SeltzerMist]

He never bragged about assaulting a child. I never said he wasn't a creep. I only said I don't think he's a pedo, and have yet to see a shred of evidence that he had anything do with that stuff, with Epstein. AI doesn't seem to either:

LMAO of course you'd resort to AI on this

 

[urherenow]

LMAO of course you'd resort to AI on this

And why not? Again, one of youtried holding an argument with me using absolutely nothing but AI responses. And AI can search through the released documents easier than I can.

 

[SeltzerMist]

And why not? Again, one of youtried holding an argument with me using absolutely nothing but AI responses. And AI can search through the released documents easier than I can.

So intellectually lazy

Again, you don't even believe Trump is guilty of sexual assault despite being found guilty of this in a civil case. If you're gonna deny that, of course you're going to deny that he's a child predator.

Because of your cognitive dissonance and TDS.

 

[urherenow]

Unsure since it's been heavily redacted. There are some names that get through like Epstein, Maxwell, Leon Black, and Jean Luc Brunei. So those people should be prosecuted (and Maxwell moved out of the club fed prison to a proper prison)?

Just setting the stage for if other evidence comes out where it directly names Trump. Although Trump has been named by victims giving first hand sworn testimonies, which you'd think would mean even more than a diary.

Who has named Trump in relation to the Epstein case? None that I've seen that say he was ever at the island, that's for sure.

Post automatically merged: Feb 3, 2026

So intellectually lazy

Again, you don't even believe Trump is guilty of sexual assault despite being found guilty of this in a civil case. If you're gonna deny that, of course you're going to deny that he's a child predator.

Because of your cognitive dissonance and TDS.

Dude, there is a reason it was civil and not criminal. And maybe learn what TDS is. You can start with a mirror.

 

[SeltzerMist]

Trump has been mentioned over 1000 times in this:

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/31/politics/new-documents-trump-epstein

And the FBI was openly admitting they were redacting Trump from the files:

https://democrats-judiciary.house.g...errorism-agents-and-endangering-public-safety

Like for fucks sake MAGA, just take a minute and try to reactivate your basic thinking skills here.

Post automatically merged: Feb 3, 2026

Dude, there is a reason it was civil and not criminal

Please, elaborate on this.

 

[titan_tim]

Who has named Trump in relation to the Epstein case? None that I've seen that say he was ever at the island, that's for sure.

If he was at the island is irrelevant, just like the chain fence argument from before. If abuse happened, it is a crime regardless of where. If they proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that he was on the island, you'd pivot to say "that's not evidence he abused girls".

So they've had people swear under perjury that they saw Trump commit acts. These are people making these claims, however with no follow-up by the courts or DOJ. They can't be considered court sworn testimonies if the court doesn't do anything about it, which they aren't. So is that the loophole you want to rest your opinion on? There are living victims out there saying they will name names, but the courts don't care. Does that make you sigh in relief? "Oh, phew! If those people aren't heard by the courts, then I don't have to consider them valid!"

 

[The Catboy]

He never bragged about assaulting a child. I never said he wasn't a creep. I only said I don't think he's a pedo, and have yet to see a shred of evidence that he had anything do with that stuff, with Epstein. AI doesn't seem to either:

Completely misrepresented my statement

This is bragging about sexual assault.
Bro, you’ve outright ignored everything shown to you that revealed he’s in the documents and on the flight logs
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c74xgp81pqgo
There have been countless victims and allegations. The fact that this has been happening for literally decades and repeated claims should concern you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations
I honestly can’t tell if you are stupid on purpose or genuinely believe Trump is innocent. But since you accept that he’s a creep, it’s considering that you are still siding with him and supporting him.

 

[MrQQ]

He never bragged about assaulting a child. I never said he wasn't a creep. I only said I don't think he's a pedo, and have yet to see a shred of evidence that he had anything do with that stuff, with Epstein. AI doesn't seem to either:

Well then you are dumb....its that simple

Post automatically merged: Feb 3, 2026

Completely misrepresented my statement

This is bragging about sexual assault.
Bro, you’ve outright ignored everything shown to you that revealed he’s in the documents and on the flight logs
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c74xgp81pqgo
There have been countless victims and allegations. The fact that this has been happening for literally decades and repeated claims should concern you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations
I honestly can’t tell if you are stupid on purpose or genuinely believe Trump is innocent. But since you accept that he’s a creep, it’s considering that you are still siding with him and supporting him.

He will refuse to acknowledge this...like all magatards do. show them evidence and they deny it. I do believe at this point they are being stupid on purpose

Post automatically merged: Feb 3, 2026

Who has named Trump in relation to the Epstein case? None that I've seen that say he was ever at the island, that's for sure.

Post automatically merged: Feb 3, 2026

Dude, there is a reason it was civil and not criminal. And maybe learn what TDS is. You can start with a mirror.

TDS was a term coined by liberals but you stole it and spun it to sound like a good thing for trump....it isn't. The fact you just used that term yourself without knowing wtf it is actually is just proves how stupid you are. But let me guess. I bet you any amount of money right now you would happily accept Joe Biden being in the files and doing nasty shit without one shred of evidence right??

 

[realtimesave]

I can’t find a solid answer on this one. Even if there was a solid answer, nothing is going to happen. Tragically, these people have the money and power to be above the law. Unless the people want to take action, nothing is going to change.

yeah that's what it seems like to me

 

[TVL]

I wonder why he didn't get an island somewhere in Mexico, I think there wouldn't have been any legal problems then... I haven't looked into it, so maybe I'm mistaken. But I think their dicks got soft if it was legal, or it was all for blackmailing, and the interest to get away with it wasn't there.

 

[Reualed]

He never bragged about assaulting a child.

Yes because pedos are going to just willingly out themselves. OF COURSE. Because we all know that pedophiles are going to be the most trueful when it comes to the horrible shit they did to children.

So what? You're just going to be sheep?
Pedo to maga "I'm not a pedo. It's fake news, none of the accusations are true. "
Maga morons: "yes leader"

 

[Sir Tortoise]

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 12/EFTA02731433.pdf

Been away from the internet for a few days and I come back to this. I don't think it's been shared here yet, so I'll give some context, but I'd suggest you don't click the link. Unless you're still defending those assosciated with Epstein. Then by all means, look at it. If you still give a shit about the truth, it should hurt.

This appears to be a trauma journal of a girl. Parts of it are written in a basic code, you read vertically and then move to the right after each pair.

Most of it describes the usual shit you're probably expecting. Sexual assault (described as "yucky" stuff), procedures that sound like abortions. I think this Epstein fella might have been up to some bad stuff.

But there's an interesting redaction. And of course, the redactions are to protect the victims, right? Never mind that they just had to pull thousands of documents because they didn't actually redact victims information, just go with it.

should not brag because that was yucky.

Doesn't really sound like she's talking about a victim, but who knows. The code makes it pretty easy to tell the name is five letters long, though.

And here's the section immediately after it.

Does this lady know you can't have any dignity if you've been with him?
I know I have none. Only skittles.

Any MAGA decoders able to help me figure this one out? Why would she start talking about a "him" who Ivana Trump has been with, right after talking about a five-letter name who brags about yucky stuff?

This is only the tip of the iceberg, by the way. A single event like this could be passed off, but there's more of these files from this one girl alone, and many other victims, and many other connections and thousands of little events that were already public knowledge long before this particular mess.
So. Anyone still willing to give it a try, if you still have any care for the truth at all? I'll greatly enjoy watching you try and suppress the feelings of discomfort to construct some shoddy, barely-plausible defence for this one instance. It may save time if you just run away from it, it's not like you can think of anything that would work for everything.

 

[titan_tim]

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 12/EFTA02731433.pdf

Been away from the internet for a few days and I come back to this. I don't think it's been shared here yet, so I'll give some context, but I'd suggest you don't click the link. Unless you're still defending those assosciated with Epstein. Then by all means, look at it. If you still give a shit about the truth, it should hurt.

This appears to be a trauma journal of a girl. Parts of it are written in a basic code, you read vertically and then move to the right after each pair.

Most of it describes the usual shit you're probably expecting. Sexual assault (described as "yucky" stuff), procedures that sound like abortions. I think this Epstein fella might have been up to some bad stuff.

But there's an interesting redaction. And of course, the redactions are to protect the victims, right? Never mind that they just had to pull thousands of documents because they didn't actually redact victims information, just go with it.

View attachment 554701

Doesn't really sound like she's talking about a victim, but who knows. The code makes it pretty easy to tell the name is five letters long, though.

And here's the section immediately after it.

View attachment 554702


Any MAGA decoders able to help me figure this one out? Why would she start talking about a "him" who Ivana Trump has been with, right after talking about a five-letter name who brags about yucky stuff?

This is only the tip of the iceberg, by the way. A single event like this could be passed off, but there's more of these files from this one girl alone, and many other victims, and many other connections and thousands of little events that were already public knowledge long before this particular mess.
So. Anyone still willing to give it a try, if you still have any care for the truth at all? I'll greatly enjoy watching you try and suppress the feelings of discomfort to construct some shoddy, barely-plausible defence for this one instance. It may save time if you just run away from it, it's not like you can think of anything that would work for everything.

View attachment 554706

I believe this is the diary I was previously talking about from the 16 year old autistic girl.

 

[urherenow]

Trump has been mentioned over 1000 times in this:

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/31/politics/new-documents-trump-epstein

And the FBI was openly admitting they were redacting Trump from the files:

https://democrats-judiciary.house.g...errorism-agents-and-endangering-public-safety

Like for fucks sake MAGA, just take a minute and try to reactivate your basic thinking skills here.

Post automatically merged: Feb 3, 2026

Please, elaborate on this.

The FBI didn't openly admit shit. You're reading the rantings of the Democrat ranking member. The hearings are on YouTube, you can listen yourself.

And once again, you seem to be laser-focused on certain lines of the article, and trying to censor the rest more than the Epstein files. His name appeared 1,800 times! In interviews, that included no accusations. There is zero new information in this article, except for things that are mentioned stemming from the very document posted here in the OP. The list of tip line allegations that the FBI were never able to corroberate (that incidentally were called in during the election cycle, then crickets).

Did you actually read the entire thing? The article subtly makes every point I've been making, in-between blatantly highlighting the bullshit that you all try to highlight here.

Included among the millions of pages of documents released Friday were new details from the FBI’s interview notes with Epstein’s victims. While there was no smoking gun that many of Trump’s critics had hoped for, the documents brought new attention to Trump’s longstanding ties to a sexual predator.

One FBI memo from an Epstein victim contained allegations that Maxwell once “presented” her to Trump at a party in New York and later made clear to Trump that she was “available,” telling her, “Oh I think he likes you. Aren’t you lucky. This is great,” according to the document. The woman told federal investigators that “nothing happened” between her and Trump.

Every interaction was before the case against Epstein was known. Every flight he was on, was in the continental US.

Documented Destinations
According to the logs and reports, the flights took place between these locations:

• Palm Beach, Florida (PBI)
• Teterboro, New Jersey (TEB) (A private airport near New York City)
• Newark, New Jersey (EWR)
• Washington, D.C. (Specifically, a May 1994 trip that included stops in D.C.)

Key Details from Flights

• Passengers: On various trips, Trump was accompanied by his then-wife Marla Maples, daughter Tiffany Trump, and son Eric Trump.
• Frequency: Logs indicate at least eight instances in the 1990s.
• Other Attendees: Several flights included Ghislaine Maxwell.

Once again, you are either not reading the entire story yourself, or you are just so hyper-focused at things that you think fit your narrative, that you're completely blind to the fact that they just don't fit. He may be a creep, but everything points to him being a creep that simply doesn't lay a finger on underage girls.

 

[titan_tim]

The FBI didn't openly admit shit. You're reading the rantings of the Democrat ranking member. The hearings are on YouTube, you can listen yourself.

And once again, you seem to be laser-focused on certain lines of the article, and trying to censor the rest more than the Epstein files. His name appeared 1,800 times! In interviews, that included no accusations. There is zero new information in this article, except for things that are mentioned stemming from the very document posted here in the OP. The list of tip line allegations that the FBI were never able to corroberate (that incidentally were called in during the election cycle, then crickets).

Did you actually read the entire thing? The article subtly makes every point I've been making, in-between blatantly highlighting the bullshit that you all try to highlight here.


Every interaction was before the case against Epstein was known. Every flight he was on, was in the continental US.

Once again, you are either not reading the entire story yourself, or you are just so hyper-focused at things that you think fit your narrative, that you're completely blind to the fact that they just don't fit. He may be a creep, but everything points to him being a creep that simply doesn't lay a finger on underage girls.

Sorry, but anything you say about _______ not being in the files, therefore they're in the clear is 100% pointless. We already know for a fact that they went through and redacted as much of Trump as they could from them. We have files like THIS which clearly show that they're protecting the rapists:

There's really NO context they can use to squirm out of that one. So you're free to attempt to say Trump isn't implicated, but you and I both know that they're protecting him and his friends. The evidence for Trump being deeply involved is probative and not just circumstantial at this point. You gain absolutely nothing from being this belligerent in the face of the continued evidence that keeps coming out. Remember, they still have terabytes of videos which SHOULD be the nail in the coffin for all these pedos, the question is if they'll have someone review them. I can't imagine they'd release them, as that would be illegal in itself unless they have someone censor them all.

 

[urherenow]

Sorry, but anything you say about _______ not being in the files, therefore they're in the clear is 100% pointless. We already know for a fact that they went through and redacted as much of Trump as they could from them. We have files like THIS which clearly show that they're protecting the rapists:

View attachment 554794

There's really NO context they can use to squirm out of that one. So you're free to attempt to say Trump isn't implicated, but you and I both know that they're protecting him and his friends. The evidence for Trump being deeply involved is probative and not just circumstantial at this point. You gain absolutely nothing from being this belligerent in the face of the continued evidence that keeps coming out. Remember, they still have terabytes of videos which SHOULD be the nail in the coffin for all these pedos, the question is if they'll have someone review them. I can't imagine they'd release them, as that would be illegal in itself unless they have someone censor them all.

The videos would absolutely be the nail in the coffin, depending on the content. People keep posting pics of Trump with Epstein, but they are always from Parties and receptions that they were at in the 90's. Seeing a video of them in the same room from the 90's, with a whole lot of other people that are dressed up, just won't do anything for the cause. A fairly public (for pageant attendees, etc) party in New York and Mara Lago aren't news. But absolutely yes, let's get the videos reviewed.


As for the diary pages... don't know what to say about that. Again, mentioning that someone thinks it's 5 letters, is specifically implying "Trump". But I don't know many young people who refer to anyone by their last name. Except in previous pages when she did address people as Mr. <name>. Ivanka's husband is Jared, that's also 5 letters. Someone from congress is bound to get a look at the unredacted paper though. The only sin I keep getting ganged up in here about, is that I try not to speculate (I at least try not to blatantly accuse someone of a serious crime without proof that I think would hold up in court). Every one of you are speculating with extreme bias.

EDIT: Oh, and that e-mail? Dated 2014. I sure am willing to bet that's not Trump's name that's redacted. And would like to see who it actually is. One can only hope that thIs particular redaction IS INDEED LEGAL, because they are actively trying to build a case on this person. Considering they didn't redact Musk's name... maybe this person is actually in one of the videos, giving enough evidence for a case?

 

[SeltzerMist]

I imagine your brain is especially exhausted after that series of mental gymnastics, and it's not like it had the energy to spare in the first place. Phew!