Milk is bad for you

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ssssuper
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 124,524
  • Replies Replies 1,418
  • Likes Likes 6
why are you sexualising an animal?

cow-struggling.gif
Judging by the color, that farm is not cleaned nearly enough, causing that floor to be slippery. The lack of prior context leaves a lot to the imagination but let me break it down for ya. That cow has sight and a sense of touch. The fall at the start couldn't have been fun but this cow looks just about alive as any other cow with capable bones, organs, and evidently two senses (could be numb, could have navigated the slip without sensory, body language tells me they braced theyselves). That's at least two full senses of understanding something beautiful. That's pretty neat!

What could an oat do? None of that. Very sad. The manipulation of life, plant or animal... It's bad for you, it's all bad for you, and it's all milk.

Or maybe that was to show big cow tiddie. Thanks!
 
Judging by the color, that farm is not cleaned nearly enough, causing that floor to be slippery. The lack of prior context leaves a lot to the imagination but let me break it down for ya. That cow has sight and a sense of touch. The fall at the start couldn't have been fun but this cow looks just about alive as any other cow with capable bones, organs, and evidently two senses (could be numb, could have navigated the slip without sensory, body language tells me they braced theyselves). That's at least two full senses of understanding something beautiful. That's pretty neat!

What could an oat do? None of that. Very sad. The manipulation of life, plant or animal... It's bad for you, it's all bad for you, and it's all milk.

Or maybe that was to show big cow tiddie. Thanks!
Cows don't have tities, they have udders. One big boob with 4 nipples (If I remember correctly. Coiuld be 6? 7? 😹 Ok I'm out.)
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: impeeza and Ricken
Nobody is sexualizing anything... But you can only get milk from tits.
By that logic, we should call a rooster's comb 'hair' or a pig's snout a 'nose' in a sexy way. We have specific, clinical, non-sexual words for animal anatomy for a reason. Calling an udder 'tits' isn't neutral. It’s a deliberate choice to use human sexual terminology, which is where the inappropriate sexualisation and bestiality vibe comes from.
 
Last edited by Deleted member 753700,
  • Like
Reactions: impeeza and IC
Judging by the color, that farm is not cleaned nearly enough, causing that floor to be slippery. The lack of prior context leaves a lot to the imagination but let me break it down for ya. That cow has sight and a sense of touch. The fall at the start couldn't have been fun but this cow looks just about alive as any other cow with capable bones, organs, and evidently two senses (could be numb, could have navigated the slip without sensory, body language tells me they braced theyselves). That's at least two full senses of understanding something beautiful. That's pretty neat!

What could an oat do? None of that. Very sad. The manipulation of life, plant or animal... It's bad for you, it's all bad for you, and it's all milk.

Or maybe that was to show big cow tiddie. Thanks!
This is a grotesque response to animal suffering. Dismissing a frightened, slipping animal's distress with 'that's pretty neat' and then making a sexualised 'tiddie' joke isn't clever or philosophical. It's sociopathic. The only thing 'manipulated' here is your attempt to sound deep to justify laughing at abuse…
 
  • Love
Reactions: IC
By that logic, we should call a rooster's comb 'hair' or a pig's snout a 'nose' in a sexy way. We have specific, clinical, non-sexual words for animal anatomy for a reason. Calling an udder 'tits' isn't neutral. It’s a deliberate choice to use human sexual terminology, which is where the inappropriate sexualisation and bestiality vibe comes from.
who said i was talkin about cows?
 
  • Like
Reactions: impeeza

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum