Trump leads Kamala in nearly every swing state [Update: Trump wins the 2024 election]

[Joe88]

https://x.com/joerogan/status/1851118464447971595

So not only is youtube shadow banning the rogan-trump interview the harris campaign is trying to create very unfavorable conditions for rogan to act like she is not backing out of the interview
Then right after she agreed to a second long interview with charlamangne who will just glaze her the entire time
https://thehill.com/homenews/4957650-harris-interview-charlemagne-breakfast-club/

 

[Dark_Ansem]

So she is trying to create very unfavorable conditions for rogan to act like she is not backing out of the interview

I'm sorry, I missed the part where Rogan isn't a partisan hack. so why should he be given fair game?

 

[Hanafuda]

I'm sorry, I missed the part where Rogan isn't a partisan hack. so why should he be given fair game?

It's his show. Her response to his invitation to appear on it was that he would have to be her Stepnfetchit, and she'd limit her appearance to one hour. (And we all know why.)

 

[Dark_Ansem]

It's his show. Her response to his invitation to appear on it was that he would have to be her Stepnfetchit, and she'd limit her appearance to one hour. (And we all know why.)

Yes we do: because he's a partisan hack incapable of conversing in good faith. I have NOT forgotten when he called for Biden to resign for something that TRump said only to say "oh well he obviously just made a mistake".

Rogan should be grateful Harris deigns him of appearing on his trash terrorist-indoctrinating propaganda "show".

 

[chrisrlink]

I just can't wait for those salty maga tears after election day (though i worry about any form of a civil war 2, though my guess it'll be short lived,and i hope a heavy handed response is done just as if trump got in)

 

[titan_tim]

Source: "a campaign insider"

Who's behind "TheBulwark"? Apopleptic never-Trumper Bill Kristol.

Well, it says four top campaign sources, so that should be good for most people. If four campaign workers are willing to talk to reporters about things like this, it doesn't sound like much of a secret.

Just because someone is a never-Trumper, doesn't mean they're incapable of telling the truth. In fact, I'd give them the benefit of the doubt even more if they're Republican leaning.

 

[Hanafuda]

Well, it says four top campaign sources ....

I re-read it. And you're right, it does say four (still 'anonymous' though) campaign sources. It could say eleventy-billion, would still be unverifiable. But more importantly, you should read it again too - because it also says they did not know these politically incorrect jokes were going to be included in Hinchcliffe's act, because he "ad libbed" them. i.e. he went rogue.

 

[SeltzerMist]

Well that's on them if they didn't properly vet the speakers

 

[BigOnYa]

I re-read it. And you're right, it does say four (still 'anonymous' though) campaign sources. It could say eleventy-billion, would still be unverifiable. But more importantly, you should read it again too - because it also says they did not know these politically incorrect jokes were going to be included in Hinchcliffe's act, because he "ad libbed" them. i.e. he went rogue.

Damage is done now though. Maybe they should of asked him to stick to the script.

 

[titan_tim]

I re-read it. And you're right, it does say four (still 'anonymous' though) campaign sources. It could say eleventy-billion, would still be unverifiable. But more importantly, you should read it again too - because it also says they did not know these politically incorrect jokes were going to be included in Hinchcliffe's act, because he "ad libbed" them. i.e. he went rogue.

Yep, you're correct. They insisted that they didn't know they'd be in there. That's some egg on my face. I guess the only question left would be why they would bring him on as the first speaker, as checking youtube for his acts are pretty brutal.

 

[tazer]

Any more ad hominems will get deleted, stop it

I think believing it makes anybody an idiot; not a specific person. There is literally no ability to verify either way. Arguing about it was already idiotic, but trying to push it as if it is the primary issue of the election really show's one's priorities.

 

[SeltzerMist]

Yep, you're correct. They insisted that they didn't know they'd be in there. That's some egg on my face. I guess the only question left would be why they would bring him on as the first speaker, as checking youtube for his acts are pretty brutal.

Note how Trump and co haven't condemned the statements either. Vance double downed on it.

 

[Dark_Ansem]

Note how Trump and co haven't condemned the statements either. Vance double downed on it.

"I didn't watch it I don't know, people should grow a sense of humah"

 

[Hanafuda]

Damage is done now though. Maybe they should of asked him to stick to the script.

I have my suspicions wrt: KillTony's motives, but you're right.

 

[tazer]

There are people who literally believe that government can control the weather, and claim the government threw hurricanes at Florida because it's a red state. These are the same kind of people that believe we should have a dictatorship. So it wouldn't be surprising if they are putting these stickers on their own lawn signs.

"Technology" can manipulate weather and the US government researches, creates, and safeguards technology that is generally 20 years ahead of that available to the general public. 20 years might be an arbitrary number, but the point should be understood. People who understand this aren't people who believe that the government should be in charge. You are trying to pose that anyone who is skeptical or distrusting of government wants dictatorship. It might be true that a fair share of them want Trump because he makes them believe he will expose truths that they are passionate about (JFK for example), not that they simply want a dictatorship, but they want an end to what has been happening up to now.

 

[SeltzerMist]

What

 

[tazer]

What

Not everyone who votes for Trump wants a dictatorship. Not everyone who believes that the US government manipulates populations are incorrect. There is a lot of room for nuance, and to get stuck in a bipolar rhetoric hinders attempts to to get ahead of the shitshow to become progressive. I believe (most) everyone wants consensus, but there is no trusted method.

 

[Dark_Ansem]

Not everyone who votes for Trump wants a dictatorship.

Then why vote for a dictator.

 

[tazer]

Then why vote for a dictator.

That's a funny phrase. Dictators don't need votes. Maybe you are placing the cart before the horse here.

 

[SeltzerMist]

Not everyone who votes for Trump wants a dictatorship.

Like the bigotry and racism, it ain't a deal breaker for em