Trump leads Kamala in nearly every swing state [Update: Trump wins the 2024 election]

  • Thread starter Thread starter x65943
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 501,431
  • Replies Replies 4,413
  • Likes Likes 4
  • Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions. Saying NO to fascists/nazis - if you are one of those, you are not welcome here
Maybe take your own advice and check your links before posting...nine out of the bottom ten ranked states on that list are red. I should also say thanks for backing my argument, I suppose.

You have yet to prove that every red state is bad and they have long term problems due to them being red. I only proved that your idea of all red states was false. As stated in this quote

"Translation: he's never looked up poverty or quality of life statistics for long-time red states. Without Texas' massive blue/purple cities doing all the heavy lifting, it would be bottom of the barrel too."

You were stating that Long term red states have a bad quality of life. Florida and Utah disproves your statement making this a false statement.
 
Low energy Kamala has done 18 less appearances than Trump since September 1st.

Why is she so lazy, bros?
View attachment 467341
Considering Harris has been campaigning since early August, I find this limitation to September 1st purposefully weird, and she isn't even doing McDonalds runs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ghjfdtg and BigOnYa
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/26/politics/trump-income-taxes-tariffs/index.html

Paywalled? Just open in incognito mode or private mode.

Tough luck, tariff alone isn't enough to replace the massive federal budget, including tons of military funds and Most Congress members aren't on bandwagon to downsize and cut the budget for military.

If Trump wins, he is going to find himself that most of his agendas aren't implemented due to disagreement from the Congress, even with republican controlled.

Kamala Harris is looking for solution that could work with divided Congress and has support from judicial branch.
 
Why can't we all just hug each other and quit arguing like little children over which person we should give all the power to? :(
Depends on who you're asking.

main-qimg-770968f040c51ac06d20f34eca803489-lq.jpg


I mean, who we are voting for is very important. One wants to unify the country. The other wants to destroy it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ghjfdtg and Xzi
Sorry, only Trump has been cancelling events due to "exhaustion" lately. Trump is an obese 78-year-old with dementia, Republicans will probably call for the 25th on day on, and nobody wants that dumb corporate douchebag Vance as president.
And yet he's done 18 more appearances thank Kamala 🤣🤣
 
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/26/politics/trump-income-taxes-tariffs/index.html

Paywalled? Just open in incognito mode or private mode.

Tough luck, tariff alone isn't enough to replace the massive federal budget, including tons of military funds and Most Congress members aren't on bandwagon to downsize and cut the budget for military.

If Trump wins, he is going to find himself that most of his agendas aren't implemented due to disagreement from the Congress, even with republican controlled.

Kamala Harris is looking for solution that could work with divided Congress and has support from judicial branch.
For anyone that doesn't know what tariffs are, they are a tax on importing from other countries. In this case, American companies having to pay a tax on importing from countries like China. Trump's claim of tariffs being paid for by those countries America is importing from is completely false, and is just his way to sway voters who assume they won't be paying as much under his presidency. But because it's the importers that are paying for this tax, how will they handle this higher price? By shifting the cost to consumers with higher pricing. 60% higher tax for China? Want your MAGA hat to cost 60% more from tariffs?

The point of tariffs was for people to make more domestic purchases rather than foreign. It would be one thing if America could sustain itself on domestic producers, but it is simply too dependent on foreign imports.
Post automatically merged:

And yet he's done 18 more appearances thank Kamala 🤣🤣
How many events has Harris and Trump done in August?
 
Florida and Utah disproves your statement making this a false statement.
Florida receives insane amounts of federal funding for a number of reasons, though I will admit Utah is an outlier like Texas.

And yet he's done 18 more appearances thank Kamala 🤣🤣
Okay? And did he ever try to reach out beyond his dumbass cultist base in a single one of them? Or was it just more fearmongering about immigrants for 15 minutes then dementia word salad for 45? Because we've all heard that a million times since 2015, sane Americans are tired of this fucking clown.
 
Tariff use if done correctly can be beneficial to a country. It is exactly that...a tool to be used strategically. If abused it can surely lead to trade wars and higher prices for consumers.
 
Okay? And did he ever try to reach out beyond his dumbass cultist base in a single one of them? Or was it just more fearmongering about immigrants for 15 minutes then dementia word salad for 45? Because we've all heard that a million times since 2015, sane Americans are tired of this fucking clown.
What if the NYT was reporting even cancelled events as part of these numbers?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xzi
Tariff use if done correctly can be beneficial to a country. It is exactly that...a tool to be used strategically. If abused it can surely lead to trade wars and higher prices for consumers.
Consumers pay the cost of tariffs always.

What if the NYT was reporting even cancelled events as part of these numbers?
Wouldn't surprise me if that was the case.
 
Last edited by Xzi,
It's a very religious state, have you seen the amount of churches they have? Makes sense most of them would be conservatives
Yes, but the Republican party didn't really throw its full support behind Romney, and Romney has been critical of Trump numerous times. Mormonism has always been kind of a black sheep in relation to Christian nationalism.
 
It's a very religious state, have you seen the amount of churches they have? Makes sense most of them would be conservatives
And those churches are exempt from paying taxes unless they are found mingling themselves in politics.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: westward and Xzi

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum