Kinda this. I got my o3DS xl for free, and pirate everything, so I don't mind the exclusives and I'm a happy camper with my hax o3ds.O3DS people salty they're not getting 20 year old games on their handheld.
N3DS people constantly looking to validate their $200 purchase of a console with only two exclusives.
Entitlement. GBATemp in a nutshell.
This, i would certainly not be one of the people to buy a n3DS because i found it to be a "Sry that our console sucked, but we fixed it, so buy this, now. Fuck you" from nintendo in the first place... But now it's a thing and a lot of people own it and watching the rather scarce advantages they get for either paying more or in most cases twice the money because they still own a o3ds is just sad somehow. Here we are watching another of the famous temp-flamefest-topics grow over the fact that nintendo somewhat messed up (again) and came up with another "brilliant" idea to make it "worth" for their customers by throwing in emulation, which the Community shats about as "only for a superior device" which at the end of the day isn't all that superior in any sense of the word. Want working SNES emulation on the go, take your Android phone (at this point pretty much EVERY android phone down to HALF the price of a N3DS) pair any controller to it and go to town. The 3DS lineup, while having some decent nintendo games i will someday remember as classics is NOT a lineup of powerfull devices worth the salt they get but just a assortment of gimmicks that feel good for gaming, coming from a company which basically invented my childhood and sometimes manages to recap that feeling with their games, which I give them credit for. But THATs it, the hardware they choose is subpar, they are STILL learning how to Internet and a lot of their marketing choices are flat-out questionable. And this one, despite the fact that they may felt it not feasible on the o3ds or whyever it turned out like this was a bad one too (snes on 3ds gpu not good enough, port the present DShardware out of its sandbox and use that, it WORKED on that before! Dont want the users of your newer fancy excuse of a consoleupgrade crying while the old users feel justified over buying your thing? Totally a thing one could have thought about BEFORE releasing the N3DS or even the old one in the first place. Want people to buy your games digitally, make a normal working DRM store for your consoles with working acounts and redownloads like the concurrency allready did LAST GEN, without artificially bundling a console to a user like a soul to a contract...)Kinda this. I got my o3DS xl for free, and pirate everything, so I don't mind the exclusives and I'm a happy camper with my hax o3ds.
But Nintendo sure isn't doing a good job on trying to entice me to buy a n3DS. I mean, a shitty port of Xenoblade, and near 30 year old games? They could do better, but they cannot, or they'd piss off 70% of their audience that uses o3DS.
blargSNES is only proposed as an alternative to O3DS users. AFAIK none of the Retroarch SNES emulators are anywhere near playable on O3DS.
They aren't trying that hard and it comes obvious wen you realize namco has Snes emulation running on O3ds for years.....
This, i would certainly not be one of the people to buy a n3DS because i found it to be a "Sry that our console sucked, but we fixed it, so buy this, now. Fuck you" from nintendo in the first place... But now it's a thing and a lot of people own it and watching the rather scarce advantages they get for either paying more or in most cases twice the money because they still own a o3ds is just sad somehow. Here we are watching another of the famous temp-flamefest-topics grow over the fact that nintendo somewhat messed up (again) and came up with another "brilliant" idea to make it "worth" for their customers by throwing in emulation, which the Community shats about as "only for a superior device" which at the end of the day isn't all that superior in any sense of the word. Want working SNES emulation on the go, take your Android phone (at this point pretty much EVERY android phone down to HALF the price of a N3DS) pair any controller to it and go to town. The 3DS lineup, while having some decent nintendo games i will someday remember as classics is NOT a lineup of powerfull devices worth the salt they get but just a assortment of gimmicks that feel good for gaming, coming from a company which basically invented my childhood and sometimes manages to recap that feeling with their games, which I give them credit for. But THATs it, the hardware they choose is subpar, they are STILL learning how to Internet and a lot of their marketing choices are flat-out questionable. And this one, despite the fact that they may felt it not feasible on the o3ds or whyever it turned out like this was a bad one too (snes on 3ds gpu not good enough, port the present DShardware out of its sandbox and use that, it WORKED on that before! Dont want the users of your newer fancy excuse of a consoleupgrade crying while the old users feel justified over buying your thing? Totally a thing one could have thought about BEFORE releasing the N3DS or even the old one in the first place. Want people to buy your games digitally, make a normal working DRM store for your consoles with working acounts and redownloads like the concurrency allready did LAST GEN, without artificially bundling a console to a user like a soul to a contract...)
This sounds absurd but RetroArch (pocketsnes) could handle Super Mario Rpg (WITH SOUND,bugging quite much of course but better than nothing,while without sound it's playable,around 45-55 fps) while blargsnes couldn't even load it,now,blargsnes is good but it's probably abadoned because of irl issues happening to the developer s. it's not likely to be enhanced anytime soon (Note:o3ds user)blargSNES is only proposed as an alternative to O3DS users. AFAIK none of the Retroarch SNES emulators are anywhere near playable on O3DS.
It can vary, actually. I was curious a while ago, so I did a speed test. Turns out PocketSNES can run the best; 40-45 fps on Super Mario World. All the others were either at or below 30 FPS.This sounds absurd but RetroArch (pocketsnes) could handle Super Mario Rpg (WITH SOUND,bugging quite much of course but better than nothing,while without sound it's playable,around 45-55 fps) while blargsnes couldn't even load it,now,blargsnes is good but it's probably abadoned because of irl issues happening to the developer s. it's not likely to be enhanced anytime soon (Note:o3ds user)
what it this ?They aren't trying that hard and it comes obvious wen you realize namco has Snes emulation running on O3ds for years.....
J Legend Retsuden, a compliation pack of famicom and super famicom games. Based on what some people have said though the game does not use emulation, otherwise the 3ds community would have snes/other rom injects a long time ago.what it this ?
Oh sorry, yes. Famicom = nes and Super Famicom = snes, Famicom is just the japanese name for the consoles."famicom" it's snes?
What you said is true actually, I tried to play Donkey Kong Country on PocketSNES and the sounds were horrible and the gameplay quite laggy if you ask me,on blargsnes,the game was fullspeed (it looked like at least,I've only played the wii vc edition and it was probably the same) but for some reason DKC2-3 wouldn't start,even if it said the src has loadedIt can vary, actually. I was curious a while ago, so I did a speed test. Turns out PocketSNES can run the best; 40-45 fps on Super Mario World. All the others were either at or below 30 FPS.
Pure speculation, but it would be really cool of there was a blargsnes core for retroarch.