Civil disobedience isn't a protected right.@SHILLacius
F••• Hillary and her Orwellian forces!
https://twitter.com/iNewsReporter/status/780547459881832453
Civil disobedience isn't a protected right.@SHILLacius
F••• Hillary and her Orwellian forces!
https://twitter.com/iNewsReporter/status/780547459881832453
I take it that you have never heard of the First Amendment...Civil disobedience isn't a protected right.
I suggest you learn the difference between peaceful protest and civil disobedience before posting something that makes you look like an idiot.I take it that you have never heard of the First Amendment...
The only idiot is you, fucking Clinton lover, 1st amendment states "freedom of speech", so I can say whatever the fuck I wantI suggest you learn the difference between peaceful protest and civil disobedience before posting something that makes you look like an idiot.
Can't tell if serious. No, the first amendment does not mean you can "say whatever the fuck you want," it's a lot more complicated than that.The only idiot is you, fucking Clinton lover, 1st amendment states "freedom of speech", so I can say whatever the fuck I want
https://www.periscope.tv/w/1DXxyLRNEAgJMNot if you are dissing Hillary!
Instead, arbitrary polling percentages from arbitrary polling companies should be used because they make sure only the Democrats and Republicans have access with only a nominal chance of a third party getting in to give the appearance of non-partisanship.I hope you're smart enough to understand that, while my personal word choice can be arbitrary from time to time, the same standards that apply to my word choice should not be applied to presidential debate qualifications.
I didn't argue for this.Instead, arbitrary polling percentages from arbitrary polling companies should be used because they make sure only the Democrats and Republicans have access with only a nominal chance of a third party getting in to give the appearance of non-partisanship.
What makes her smug?A few months ago I would've said Johnson, but f*ck it. Trump 2016. I just want to see smug witch Hillary lose.
But, I cannot vote, so I shall watch!
Examples are cool, as opposed to blanket statements... I'm just tryin'a figure out how she's any more smug than Donald isWatching or listening to her would make that pretty self-evident.
She also seems entitled to the presidenscy, seeing how she screwed Sanders out of the nomination.
Examples are cool, as opposed to blanket statements... I'm just tryin'a figure out how she's any more smug than Donald is
Arguably Ted Cruz is just as unlikable however.Man, Hillary really did luck out facing Trump this election. Seems to be the only person unlikable enough for people to forget just how unlikable she is. Say something negative about her and people rush in to defend her because she's not Trump.
It was implied when you said "Trump 2016. I just want to see smug witch Hillary lose."Never said that she is.
I guess that's fair. I don't like that violence flocks to him wherever he goes, thoughShould've been more clear. Donald has qualities that I like. Particularly, he's funny, strong on immigration, seems sincere (unlike cold robotic Hillary) and his message of "Make America Great Again!" would really resonate with people, and that certainly beats "I'm with Her!"