I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and just assume you are miss-remembering
while i dont think they're a huge deal, hand-waving away inconvenient facts just makes your position look weaker. better ways to address the problem, in my opinion. though i do hate she literally wants to kill assange, while at the same time being so lackadaisical with her emails. she shady, but she aint crazy.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/p...-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system
emphasis mine:
"Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information,
there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."
"Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence,
especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.
In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of:
clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of
intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice.
We do not see those things here.
To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now."