Probably for a good reason, me personally would wait for official news. But i hear others use shadownand which has i uess no known problems but is not full LUMACFW is something little different.Is it safe to update A9LH to the version that can boot without the SD? It's been like 2 months and there's still no official release.
You can but I wouldn't use the NAND CFW as an everyday solution. I'd still use the regular SD CFW. I installed it cuz it merged screeninit and noscreeninit a9lh and when I screw my cfw installation, I can boot without SD, insert the SD and use my Updater to fix it.Is it safe to update A9LH to the version that can boot without the SD? It's been like 2 months and there's still no official release.
GBA injects have worked for a long time. GPSP works reasonably well. Also, no, that's not so simple and it's still WIP, NDS stuff isn't like that.what!! nds in luma? how so, do you convert with decrypt9 and install just like any cia file, or there is some other method?
is gba a go also?
From mine and many others testing it seems safe, though I wouldn't update to it unless you know what you are doing and have a way to unbrick if it messes up (aka ability/willingness to hardmod and a NAND backup of preferably right before trying to update)Is it safe to update A9LH to the version that can boot without the SD? It's been like 2 months and there's still no official release.
6.1.1. officialDev version o 6.1.1 :
* DS games won't boot
* GBA games won't boot
* DsiWares won't boot
Wow.
Then why not use the official? Why use the dev or something if you know is not working.Yes I know.
Do you have any reason to be using the Dev version?Yes I know.
afaik the latest version of luma support twlBg.cxi on both the dev and non-dev version.WTF I wrote sysmodules.cxi, I want to say twlBg.cxi