That's complete bullshit actually. Every form of hacking comes with a risk and I go into every hack full knowing that this might end up breaking my system. That's the cost of hacking.
There's a small number of people who've bricked as a result of this method. I am willing to risk a small chance of bricking.
Until you brick using an unsafer method.
The fact that it's been pulled speaks volumes. I have no idea why some individuals see this as a point of debate. Sure, you've got to accept the risk of something breaking but I can't see why the attachment to OTPLess exists when experienced and skilled hardmodders themselves attest to dealing with case after case of bricked N3DS units that inexplicably died when their users ran SafeA9HLInstaller. The volume of these cases simply didn't exist prior to OTPLess / SafeA9LHInstaller 2.5.