Hardware [Discussion] Nintendo has been sued?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dr.Hacknik

Ashley | Developer | Trans
OP
Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Messages
1,773
Trophies
1
Age
24
Location
inside your fridge
Website
dochacknik.keybase.pub
XP
2,219
Country
United States
It appears that Nintendo ha seen sued for it's popular home console, the Switch. Specifically for it's joycon design. By none other than GameVice. The company claims that Nintendo is using one of its existing patents without permission. They seem to have already created a console with a similar design concept to that of the switch.

3272404-screen+shot+2017-08-11+at+2.48.35+pm.png


Nintendo hasn't exactly responded to the matter yet, but the company wishes to stop all Switch sales. So, is this the actions of Nintendo haters, or just plain business?


Source
 
Last edited by Dr.Hacknik,

Jayro

MediCat USB Dev
Developer
Joined
Jul 23, 2012
Messages
13,001
Trophies
4
Location
WA State
Website
ko-fi.com
XP
17,103
Country
United States
Nintendo has money, and damn-good lawyers. I'm pretty sure they'll win against this bullshitter. They'll defend their new hardware to the bloody death.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr.Hacknik
D

Deleted-355425

Guest
I can see where they are coming from, you slide in a screen and get to use the controls on the sides. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
 

Jayro

MediCat USB Dev
Developer
Joined
Jul 23, 2012
Messages
13,001
Trophies
4
Location
WA State
Website
ko-fi.com
XP
17,103
Country
United States
Yep.
Just another company that wants to get some more money because they're desperate.
I think they are grasping at straws. If that picture is the console in question, Nintendo will win. That thing doesn't even have detachable controllers on it...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr.Hacknik

johnbus

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2014
Messages
265
Trophies
0
XP
249
Country
United States
So, is this the actions of Nintendo haters, or just plain business?

In the world of patents: If you can, sue. Patents are often made as vague as possible, not just to protect the original product, but to claim copyright infringement for any product that is in any way similar and more successful.

No reason to assume any sort of malice on their part. This is just how bad businesses stay afloat.
 
D

Deleted-355425

Guest
In the world of patents: If you can, sue. Patents are often made as vague as possible, not just to protect the original product, but to claim copyright infringement for any product that is in any way similar and more successful.

No reason to assume any sort of malice on their part. This is just how bad businesses stay afloat.

+1 to that mate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Slower speeds for gen4
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    I'll reformat and have a 3tb raid0 m. 2 at least
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Lmao that sold out fast
    +1
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Yeet the cat.
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Good idea
    +1
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    i thought everybody knew cocktails are like 75% ice
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Yeah but not like this.
  • Veho @ Veho:
    It's not like they're complaining that their Slurpee is 99% ice or something, but if the cocktail calls for "shot of vodka, shot of vermouth, shot of gin, shot of Campari, three shots of juice, squirt of lemon" and ends up being a thimbleful of booze, that's a problem.
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    the funny thing is cocktails in norway are only allowed to have 1 20ml shot of booze
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    so..... yeah
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    we're used to only having a thimbleful of booze
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Booo.
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    same thing if you want whisky on the rocks or something, you can't get a double
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    but you could buy as many shots of whisky (or anything else) as you want and ask for a glass of ice and pour them in
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    it's dumb
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Maybe.
  • Veho @ Veho:
    There was a comparison of the number of Ibuprofen poisonings before and after they limited the maximum dosage per box or per pill (i'll look that up). No limit on the number of boxes you can still buy as many as you want, so people argued it was pointless.
  • Veho @ Veho:
    But the number of (accidental) poisonings dropped because drinking an entire package of ibuprofen pills went from "I need a new liver" to "I need a new box of Ibuprofen".
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Here we have ketoprofen that used to be prescription-only because of the risk of toxic dosages, but then they halved the dose per pill and sell them in bottles of six pills apiece instead of twenty and it doesn't need a prescription any more. Yes you can buy more than one bottle but people simply don't.
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Usually accidentally overdose of ibuprofen here is from people taking like cold medicine then ibuprofen for a headache and the combination is over what they need
    Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hp24nDVKvY