Sort of, not really.
Boot9strap uses the sighax (vulnerability in the bootloader) but it doesn't run sighax (the launcher from derrek). Instead it work like Aurora's A9LH payload and instead looks for boot.firm on your SD Card and if that doesn't exist it looks for boot.firm on your CTRNAND.
Basically boot9strap is safer and easier to use than sighax. As far as I know sighax doesn't support the NTRCard booting method either.
I don't think so - isn't derrek's run completely from NAND, but b9s gets the payload from the SD card?Sighax from derrek is just an installer. After using derrek's installer properly, and as long as you used Boot9Strap as the chainloader, you will end up with an identical setup as if you used SafeB9SInstaller. That's the only difference. It's just a different installer with less sanity checks.
Really? I asked when SigHax.com was first released. I think it was in a thread with SciresM replying, but I can't remember exactly.I don't think so - isn't derrek's run completely from NAND, but b9s gets the payload from the SD card?
I've been asking that since the changelog for 1.1 was released. Nobody responded yet. Is the face simply because they list the typical Nintendo release notes of system stability?View attachment 88990
I uuh... what?
Holy Shit. But is it necessary kinda like update A9LH was?
Not yet. The only thing that can use this is the latest Luma nightly but that still has bugs, being a nightly and all.Holy Shit. But is it necessary kinda like update A9LH was?
Why not wait for a real release and not a pre-release?Holy Shit. But is it necessary kinda like update A9LH was?
I thought that was a real releaseWhy not wait for a real release and not a pre-release?
It has a pre-release tag in orange on the github https://github.com/SciresM/boot9strap/releases.I thought that was a real release