Yes.Can u even have EMUNAND on regular wii?
Yes.Can u even have EMUNAND on regular wii?
There are tutorials, look for them.How and why would you need too?
So you can install as many channels to the emuNAND as you like, rather than be limited to the 512MB of the Wii's NAND.How and why would you need too?
I heard that yes there is a Emunand for Wii and vWii but that it is useless since there is a fully operational Homebrew ChannelHow and why would you need too?
Well, a very large part of "IOSU" runs headless and can't be changed via update.I get the vibe that you don't really know much about how IOSU works and are just kind of speculating for the sake of speculation
Well, a very large part of "IOSU" runs headless and can't be changed via update.
And in all reality all one needs to do is replace signature check prior to decrypt with a pass signature script and all things now pass security check.
It would go un-noticed and would remain forever as it is unable to be patched. Physical access to the console would be the only way to correct it.
A real good example would be to look at the latest Googletv stick.
But hey, "I don't really know much about IOSU or ARM" so keep browser-sploiting and everyone should just stay here and continue to complain at the devs about how it doesn't work very well. The whole point for browser and kernel exploit getting released was to grow the exploiter base to further development of future exploits...(which will ultimately needs to be IOSU)
You have any support for that claim? IOSU is contained within OSv11, which can definitely be updated and is almost certainly signed like all other titles?
i thought it was more like a BIOS or CMOSIt's more like an SD card. They even use the eMMC format.
In it's operation, you would be correct, but on a physical side it is an over glorified SD card.i thought it was more like a BIOS or CMOS
maybe if not so in it physical construction but in its operation
ie. housing the systems basic operations and FW
He's a well-educated troll. The worst kind lolIDK i feel like he knows too much to be a troll.
I'm hoping for USB support, SD cards are lame, overpriced and my slot is fucked.
I really want to look into this round of homebrew development.
Yes, and it's not a claim it's reality. Bow down to something greater than you trick.You have any support for that claim? IOSU is contained within OSv11, which can definitely be updated and is almost certainly signed like all other titles?
Ohhhhhh boy...Bow down to something greater than you trick.
I feel like you could be doing better things with your time. Like, you know, developing this software you claim to be making and getting it out in the open so that you don't lose what little credibility you have with the few remaining people on this forum. Or, gee, if you ACTUALLY wanted to be helpful, getting in on the hacking groups IRC/Skype chat and giving them a handI am not quite ready to Grace-U yet so I prefer to taunt.
Meaning, yes parts of IOSU are contained within OSv11 but the vast majority of IOS OSv11 has no access to and cannot see at all.
This is how even though you say no don't update the console is still able to update. They just send to IOS and it grants the update permission.
OSv11 is Cafe OS. Remember shared pool. Cafe SDK only contains enough info to develop software for CafeOS. Have you extracted Cafe (OSv11) kernel yet? I really do not wish to argue with you. So, after this post I am done with talking about it. And if you feel so inclined to have the last word then so be it.So I assume there's more inside IOSU than what fw.img has? Given what we have on the wiki, fw.img does all of IOSU's tasks. As for this hidden IOSU portion, I suppose you know it's title ID?
(Also, talking about OSv11 not having access to IOSU is stupid because OSv11 is not what runs: Cafe OS and IOSU, which OSv11 is comprised of, run)
This is true regardless of how IOSU runs: it does the update process.
OSv11 is Cafe OS. Remember shared pool. Cafe SDK only contains enough info to develop software for CafeOS. Have you extracted Cafe (OSv11) kernel yet?
What? Why would you need to spoof anything? And you would be playing on the latest firmware so there would be no worries with latest SDK.
The controller (IOSU) has the ability to be lightly patched and that's it. Many parts cannot be repaired or it will break IOS and probably the console completely. Which is the exact reason the IOS is being heavily documented. A complete knowledge of IOS will allow circumventing of patches that can be made to IOS that would block unsigned channels. Nintendo hasn't even made a console that security wise is up to par with xb360.
The thought was if we can't patch things then nobody else can either. But a patch isn't needed to get control. IOS is dumb and once you control it does whatever you tell it to. It was that way with GC, wii, and now U as well. Honestly, the fact the spoofer has been out a bit (thanks to Crediar)
and Nintendo has yet to show any concern for it. It may be they are done playing. And have realized they are ultimately going to lose this battle.
I'll give it two more weeks to see an update to the wii u before I call it as them waving the white flag.