The production of software is not postponed - they only postponed the production of consoles if I understand correctly.So does it mean, the people who already bought it wont get new games for it?
That sucks :/
The production of software is not postponed - they only postponed the production of consoles if I understand correctly.So does it mean, the people who already bought it wont get new games for it?
That sucks :/
So does it mean, the people who already bought it wont get new games for it?
That sucks :/
=SUp next, Atari sue Nintendo for making a home video game console....
The lawsuit is moronic, neither the device nor the interface looks anything like Apple's - they're simply trying to stall the sales of the Vita. For what reason? I have no clue. They're not even in the same sector of the industry. If they think that this will boost sales of crappy iOS games then they're going to be quite suprised that their ploy didn't work.
Or perhaps Apple is the only company in the world who still thinks that the "3G" version of the Vita is a phone, and thus a potential threat to iPhone's dominance.
Hint - it's not.
Just another moronic suit of Apple's - this'll blow over in a matter of weeks. The only people hurt are the customers. I sincerely hope that the judge will order Apple to pay Sony for the losses they sustained while the Vita was put on-hold.
So does it mean, the people who already bought it wont get new games for it?
That sucks :/
It means I can only have Uncharted and Lumines. On the bright side, it's still better than what the 3DS has got.
keep telling yourself that it will make it all better
Perhaps, but still, trying to convey the idea that "having icons" by proxy means "copying Apple" is unacceptable. This needs to end, I have had enough of Apple putting an end to promising infrastructures and devices. First they limit distribution of Samsung devices on ridiculous grounds, which is direct intervention into free market and should be considered a *mortal sin* and now they're putting logs on the way of a device that isn't even a threat to theirs.The lawsuit is moronic, neither the device nor the interface looks anything like Apple's - they're simply trying to stall the sales of the Vita. For what reason? I have no clue. They're not even in the same sector of the industry. If they think that this will boost sales of crappy iOS games then they're going to be quite suprised that their ploy didn't work.
Or perhaps Apple is the only company in the world who still thinks that the "3G" version of the Vita is a phone, and thus a potential threat to iPhone's dominance.
Hint - it's not.
Just another moronic suit of Apple's - this'll blow over in a matter of weeks. The only people hurt are the customers. I sincerely hope that the judge will order Apple to pay Sony for the losses they sustained while the Vita was put on-hold.
Honestly I think it has something to do with the tyranny within the elites of Apple. Their success has led them to believe they have a right to a market monopoly. It seems to me, Apple are like typical communists.
If anything, this means Apple representatives are blind and retarded.when I first saw a Vita being used by a friend of mine I thought he was using his ipad.
Perhaps, but still, trying to convey the idea that "having icons" by proxy means "copying Apple" is unacceptable. This needs to end, I have had enough of Apple putting an end to promising infrastructures and devices. First they limit distribution of Samsung devices on ridiculous grounds, which is direct intervention into free market and should be considered a *mortal sin* and now they're putting logs on the way of a device that isn't even a threat to theirs.The lawsuit is moronic, neither the device nor the interface looks anything like Apple's - they're simply trying to stall the sales of the Vita. For what reason? I have no clue. They're not even in the same sector of the industry. If they think that this will boost sales of crappy iOS games then they're going to be quite suprised that their ploy didn't work.
Or perhaps Apple is the only company in the world who still thinks that the "3G" version of the Vita is a phone, and thus a potential threat to iPhone's dominance.
Hint - it's not.
Just another moronic suit of Apple's - this'll blow over in a matter of weeks. The only people hurt are the customers. I sincerely hope that the judge will order Apple to pay Sony for the losses they sustained while the Vita was put on-hold.
Honestly I think it has something to do with the tyranny within the elites of Apple. Their success has led them to believe they have a right to a market monopoly. It seems to me, Apple are like typical communists.
Might be. I just realized that it is April 1st, at least here and for about 40 minutes now.This sounds more like an april fools newsitem .