Homebrew Utilitii

  • Thread starter Thread starter XarcusEater
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 6,145
  • Replies Replies 26

XarcusEater

Active Member
Newcomer
Joined
Apr 30, 2010
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Trophies
0
Location
US
XP
16
Country
United States
Utilitii
UPDATE! utilitii 0.2a has a functional wbfs manager
Utilitii is a complete wii utility for mac. It combines a WBFS manager, NUS Downloader, hbc app manager and many other things.
Disclaimer:I take no responsibility for anything that may happen to your computer or wii after using this app.
USE THIS AT YOUR OWN RISK!
(Although I doubt anything bad will happen)
This is a pre-alpha build and most features will not work. I would like feedback about the gui and feature additions. i would also appreciate it if someone would design a better icon.
Thanks.
XE
[/url="http://www.mediafire.com/?8kh1pcx7l6rzkcl"]Download[/url]
 
im sorry bout the double post...

hey xarcuseater, i appreciate all the mac utilitys you post, but how come none of them EVER work for me>?

you need to make universal apps... not everyone has an intel mac.
 
PLEEEEASE build it for ppc... (ppc machines are limited to leopard of course)

i have a dual core powermac G5 .( if i hadda waited a few more months i coulda got a mac pro... so i guess its my fault.)
 
Utilitii 0.2a:

the wbfs manager is now functional: click Find WBFS drive, select a drive from the popup, and click load.
Note: this app only works on snow leopard 32/64 bit.
I would like a new icon and definitely want to know what features i should add.
I appreciate the feedback.
Thx,
XE
download : http://www.mediafire.com/?8kh1pcx7l6rzkcl
 
pretty sure im the only mac user around here... and i cannot run it bc i have a ppc. i do however have a hackintosh thats intel. i might upgrade to snow leopard to see if this works... doubtful tho.

great work xarcuseater however you need to make the app able for ANYone to use... you are marketing this app to maybe 15 percent of mac users. wich is very few.
 
thank you lexip. It's true that not everybody has an intel Mac, but I don't think it's necessary to rewrite it using old frameworks
 
intel processors are garbage anyway. i'll stick with my ppc that blows a brand new mac pro tower out of the water any day. especially with all the upgrades ive given it... but alas if i have to use a p.o.s 1999 hp hackintosh intel 1.8 ghz with 2 gbs ram to run your program then i guess i will not use it.

since the day that mac banged pc ive been angry and refuse to update my machine... intel processors are garage compared to ppc. cheap and a dime a dozen.

sorry if ive been trouble for you with my comments. its just i hate running into programs i want and cannot have lol.
 
Yes, there will be an option to convert to wbfs, ciso, wdf soon.
Also,USB channel creation for games is almost done.
P.S. Anyone found problems or have any feedback?
 
terminal_illness said:
intel processors are garbage anyway. i'll stick with my ppc that blows a brand new mac pro tower out of the water any day. especially with all the upgrades ive given it... but alas if i have to use a p.o.s 1999 hp hackintosh intel 1.8 ghz with 2 gbs ram to run your program then i guess i will not use it.

since the day that mac banged pc ive been angry and refuse to update my machine... intel processors are garage compared to ppc. cheap and a dime a dozen.

sorry if ive been trouble for you with my comments. its just i hate running into programs i want and cannot have lol.
have fun using it in 5 years
 
It's not Intel processor that sucks, it's the windows platform. Apple changed to Intel for a good reason, PPC proseccors weren't as good as Intels. At least my Intel macbook is decent. You should give Intel a chance. However, why only snow leopard? Is 10.5 build too much to ask?
 
roku93 said:
You should give Intel a chance.
i'm fairly sure he cant rattle off one thing that his processor does anyway, and would have clue whatsoever if you placed an intel chip in his mac - he's just posting in an attempt to verify he's still alive.
 
Terminal_illness: So in 10 years, you'd rather use your G5 running somewhere between 1.8-2.3 GHz, while the rest of the Mac world is running at 7.2GHz?
 
Um... Can we discuss the program instead of ppc vs intel?
I can't make a leopard build because it uses new snow leopard frameworks.
 
I'd happily test this since I'm still using WBFS for Mac 1.2, but it doesn't find my drive. Other utilities will find it, but clicking on Find WBFS doesn't add anything to the list.
frown.gif
Great potential, though, would love to see this progress.

Using a Seagate Xtreme 1.5tb w/ a WBFS/FAT partition setup.
 
so thats at least 2 out of 4 that cannot run your program, and one that can for some reason glitches out...

i agree that 7.2 ghz is better than my 2.3 and in 5 years or maybe even less i will bite the bullet. however that being said im still not happy.

xarcuseater i remember you released a program not too long ago that nobody could get working either (including myself) and that was supposed to work in leopard... but didnt.
dont quit your day job.

its not that hard to use the leopard framework. its not like leopard apps cant be run on snow leopard so wtf? why not use the framework that you KNOW everyone can use...
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum