Rumor: Infinity Ward Going AWOL on Modern Warfare?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raiser
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 1,448
  • Replies Replies 10

Raiser

I am mad scientist.
Member
Joined
May 31, 2008
Messages
1,563
Reaction score
42
Trophies
1
Website
Visit site
XP
681
Country
Canada
QUOTE said:
With two games, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and its sequel, Infinity Ward brought shooters out of the World War II ghetto and into the modern era. rumours are swirling that the developer won’t be developing the inevitable third MW.

Each year, publisher Activision releases Call of Duty games like clockwork. Set during World War II, the first Call of Duty title was developed by Activision subsidiary Infinity Ward. The second title was also developed by Infinity Ward, but Activision brought on another Activision subsidiary, Treyarch, to develop the third entry in the series.

For the fourth title, Infinity Ward threw a curveball with Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, a modern take on the war shooter, complete with fancy modern military tech like night vision. (Treyarch, in the meantime, churned out another WWII shooter — though, is currently rumored to be working on a shooter set during the Vietnam War.) The sequel, Modern Warfare 2, was a smash hit, selling 4.7 copies globally in its first 24 hours. The game earned $US550 worldwide in its first five days. The end of the game leaves the door wide open for a sequel.

Just as Infinity Ward is basking in the success of Modern Warfare 2 and readying downloadable content comes a handful of rumours that the developer will not be working on the next Modern Warfare game. Insiders told website VG247 that Infinity Ward is not developing Modern Warfare 3 and is instead working on a “completely new” title.

Modern Warfare 3, however, has not officially been announced.

This does seem to correspond with what Kotaku posted back in July 2008 when the company announced it had been given the chance to create a “unique new IP by Infinity Ward, that we’ll have complete control over”. The Infinity Ward source page with this announcement has since been erased. It is important to note that Infinity Ward considers Modern Warfare to be a new IP.

According to VG247, “It’s unclear where the third game will be made if IW really has gone AWOL from the series. We were told by one dev source that a Canadian studio was handling it, but another pointed to newly-formed Sledgehammer Games, headed by ex-Visceral bosses Glen Schofield and Michael Condrey.” All of this info sound rather vague — it could be this or that. This might because, if true, the future of the series has not yet been ironed out.

Another rumor that game site Destructoid is running is that Infinity War is actually developing a new MMO — citing sources saying that Infinity Ward is hiring people from Sony Online Entertainment, one of which may be the lead designer of EverQuest II. Blizzard employees are also apparently involved.

Last fall, Infinity Ward stated that it would do something other than Call of Duty one day. “When we feel like we can’t innovate any further in the Call of Duty franchise, then we’ll do something else.” But is that something else a massively multiplayer online game?

And would Activision, not known as the most charitable of companies, allow its Infinity Ward subsidiary do something other than Modern Warfare? Especially considering how much money the developer has made for the company? But perhaps Acitivision thinks that the Modern Warfare brand is so strong that it doesn’t need Infinity Ward or that Infinity Ward’s talents can be expanded to an entirely new title or franchise.

Kotaku reached out to Activision, but did not receive a comment before this article’s publication.
Source

I wouldn't doubt this. I mean, Modern Warfare 2 wasn't really that different from it's predecessor. What more could they add to a MW3?
Yes, MW3 hasn't been officially announced, but me thinks it's eventually going to come especially with the story still incomplete.

But a MW-type MMO... interesting..
Rumors is rumors.
 
Wouldn't mind that actually. MW 1 was a really good game, but my hype for the second game was way less and I didn't amuse it so much. There were some good missions, but it never amazed me like MW 1 did.

Also, they say they are making a MMO, that MMO could be everything, doesn't have to be MW-type.
 
QUOTE said:
selling 4.7 copies globally in its first 24 hours.
QUOTE$US550 worldwide in its first five days.

I think Mario sold more then that.
rolleyes.gif


On a more serious note though, it's all just more rumors...
 
i think there should have been million after both 4.7 and $550...
MMOs are really gaining momentum esp since so many ads are concerning them... i mean some just showing women and no games but many (varieties) of the games are rising
 
N64Temp said:
But Modern Warfare is better than the WWII games although they should make a Vietnam game.

I think the general assumption is CoD7 is a Vietnam game, if you were wondering.

The thing with WWII shooters is that they aren't bad for being set in an older time, they were bad because it was a worn out time period for shooters. Call of Duty, Medal of Honor, Brothers in Arms, it was just way too many. Now with all these previous WWII shooters jumping on the modern time bandwagon, in a few years we'll be saying "modern shooters are boring". Then I guess we'll be going to the future with lasers!

...Oh wait, Halo.
 
The thing about WW2 shooters is they never have a REAL storyline, with exceptions such a wolfenstein. Usually its just "this is were you are fighting now kill some guys". If they offered a story as grand as halo they would be more appealing.
 
Guild McCommunist said:
N64Temp said:
But Modern Warfare is better than the WWII games although they should make a Vietnam game.

I think the general assumption is CoD7 is a Vietnam game, if you were wondering.

The thing with WWII shooters is that they aren't bad for being set in an older time, they were bad because it was a worn out time period for shooters. Call of Duty, Medal of Honor, Brothers in Arms, it was just way too many. Now with all these previous WWII shooters jumping on the modern time bandwagon, in a few years we'll be saying "modern shooters are boring". Then I guess we'll be going to the future with lasers!

...Oh wait, Halo.
*ahem* Doom, Quake and Unreal Tournament are all set in the future, not to mention are far better franchises than Halo.

Futuristic games would be far more enjoyable if people came up with unique scenarios, just like modern shooters and old World War 2 themed games. Jeez, there are so many war events in history that have never been told through video games like the Crusades. Though I suppose any religious war game might be offensive to all the religious wing nuts, not that it would matter cause they are the kinds of people who cried about MW2. The notion that MW3 won't ever come out is silly though, if there is a sequel then it won't be any time soon if Infinity Ward has any common sense, they would be working on another title before starting MW3 and prolonging the expectation if they do happen to announce it at some point, or they are going to wrap up the game through extra content via DLC.
 

Site & Scene News