Hacking Followed the guide perfectly, "exception occurred error"

[Kazuma77]

That wasn't a personal attack. I don't agree with some of your above views regarding how a 3DS should be hacked, so I don't think I would use one of your scripts either.

She more or less implied that my scripts would contain mistakes. So, I'd consider that a personal attack. And it's not like my scripts force you to do things my way. Case in point, I prefer BootCTR9. But maybe someone else prefers CBM9. I include a script to switch to any chainloader you want. I'm not a fan of Luma's chainloader, because of it's lack of support for converted payloads, but I still provide a script in my dynamic configurations that lets you switch to it, and I still include every workaround needed to run things like Gateway with it. I don't still actively use A9LH (just for testing purposes), but my installers let those that want to install it all the same. This isn't about views. Scripts don't have views. They either do what they're supposed to, or they do not. Mine do, I assure you.

 

[Lacius]

She more or less implied that my scripts would contain mistakes. So, I'd consider that a personal attack. And it's not like my scripts force you to do things my way. Case in point, I prefer BootCTR9. But maybe someone else prefers CBM9. I include a script to switch to any chainloader you want. I'm not a fan of Luma's chainloader, because of it's lack of support for converted payloads, but I still provide a script in my dynamic configurations that lets you switch to it, and I still include every workaround needed to run things like Gateway with it. I don't still actively use A9LH (just for testing purposes), but my installers let those that want to install it all the same. This isn't about views. Scripts don't have views. They either do what they're supposed to, or they do not. Mine do, I assure you.

Thinking your scripts are likely to contain errors isn't a personal attack either.

 

[Kazuma77]

Thinking your scripts are likely to contain errors isn't a personal attack either.

It was an implication of incompetence. So, yes, it was. And it was baseless. She doesn't even know me. If they did contain errors, they would have bricked something and forced me to reflash it, but they don't. They check every file (twice if possible -- with verify and sha, though a verify on an A9LH firm0 would fail for obvious reasons, so, I just have to settle for an SHA that's been confirmed identical by multiple devices). I do installs for people all the time. I wouldn't be using, much less distributing, something that I had not put through it's paces. But you know what? They're plain text. So, by all means, have a look. Try to find some errors.

 

[Lacius]

It was an implication of incompetence. So, yes, it was. And it was baseless. She doesn't even know me. If they did contain errors, they would have bricked something and forced me to reflash it, but they don't. They check every file (twice if possible -- with verify and sha, though a verify on an A9LH firm0 would fail for obvious reasons, so, I just have to settle for an SHA that's been confirmed identical by multiple devices). I do installs for people all the time. I wouldn't be using, much less distributing, something that I had not put through it's paces. But you know what? They're plain text. So, by all means, have a look. Try to find some errors.

Questioning or doubting the quality of one's work is not a personal attack.

 

[TheDarkGreninja]

I think we've digressed quite a bit.

 

[Kazuma77]

Questioning or doubting the quality of one's work is not a personal attack.

The way it was phrased was practically the equivalent of "You made that? Then I'm not eating any." If that's not a personal attack, then I don't know what is. Quit defending the undefendable. And unless you've even looked at it, how would you know? It's all in plain text, so, if there are errors, you should be able to point them out easily. If you can't, then please STFU and stop making false allegations.

I could say the same thing of your beloved over-worshiped guide. That could be full of errors too. Unless I actually care to point some out though, it would be a baseless rumor. Just like yours. If you can't even be bothered to check it out, then you have no right to criticize it.

Regardless, the issue is resolved. If you just want to argue with me for the Hell of it, do it via PM. Could we get a mod to close the thread already?