Today's test was:
- Papalotl 3.2.7 - Lite: Uses different capture method, produces larger file sizes while maintaining good quality even at the lowest settings.
- Papalotl 3.2.7 - Pro: Uses different capture method, produces smaller file sizes while maintaining good quality even at the lowest settings.
This only begs for a unified version of both scripts into one with a toggeable button...
- This would benefit me in my tests to find "the best" capture method depending on task. I'd be free to focus in improving just one script, not both at the same time...
Tests indicates:
- Lite: Good for emulation, but causes larger file sizes. Better for everything else.
- Pro: Even better for emulation, causes smaller file sizes. Slightly lower for everything else.
SEE THE DILEMA?
Figuring out why things broke, allowed me to progressively attempt to improve it further and further with each script version.
I think it's "mature enough" to be put out to test... and again, can't improve this further... I've exhausted all my posibilities at this point.
It was fun learning and fixing/solving/improving surely has made me more confident with my logical thinking skills.
Hope you find it useful!
It is for me, otherwise I wouldn't have spent so much time on this.
And it's not because I wanted, it's because It's physiologically impossible for me to sleep longer than 3 or 4 hours every day... so I occupied my mind into this project daily.