Visual of the Switch 1 hacking timeline, with a visualization of where we are from the switch 2 launch (152 days post launch)

  • Thread starter Thread starter x65943
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 15,889
  • Replies Replies 78
  • Likes Likes 24
I'm certain most of us actually know that it won't be hacked because it cannot be hacked. That's why the topic rarely comes up any more. No one with a shred of credibility is working on it because it is a waste of time. This generation Nintendo is secure.
You should google Gezine then because he has a very robust track record in the PS5 scene

And no, going to highschool with Kevin Mitnic does not make you more qualified than Gezine
 
  • Like
Reactions: DigBar
You should google Gezine then because he has a very robust track record in the PS5 scene

And no, going to highschool with Kevin Mitnic does not make you more qualified than Gezine
People equally qualified (or even more) like SciresM have said over and over again that the microkernel design of the Switch is bug-free.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20260416_081612_Chrome.png
    Screenshot_20260416_081612_Chrome.png
    306.8 KB · Views: 8
  • Screenshot_20260416_081626_Chrome.png
    Screenshot_20260416_081626_Chrome.png
    308.2 KB · Views: 5
People equally qualified (or even more) like SciresM have said over and over again that the microkernel design of the Switch is bug-free.
and the xbox one (mentioned in that second screengrab) has now been blown wide open - through hard modding

I agree it won't be easy, but time and time again we see these systems get hacked eventually
 
and the xbox one (mentioned in that second screengrab) has now been blown wide open - through hard modding
Bearing in mind that not everyone had gotten further into hard modifying the Xbox One in regards to glitching, even after this discovery was found, but some day we'll see progress.
 
Bearing in mind that not everyone had gotten further into hard modifying the Xbox One in regards to glitching, even after this discovery was found, but some day we'll see progress.
IMHO the main thing holding back Xbox one hacking was near complete lack of interest
 
and the xbox one (mentioned in that second screengrab) has now been blown wide open - through hard modding

I agree it won't be easy, but time and time again we see these systems get hacked eventually
The Switch 2 has a dual core lockstep (DLCS) precisely to avoid voltage exploits like the Xbox One one.

I think it is the only gaming console in existence with a DCLS.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20260502_211005_Reddit.png
    Screenshot_20260502_211005_Reddit.png
    607.6 KB · Views: 9
The Switch 2 has a dual core lockstep (DLCS) precisely to avoid voltage exploits like the Xbox One one.

I think it is the only gaming console in existence with a DCLS.
I'm not saying to exploit will be the same as the xbox one

just pointing out that the 2020 tweet you shared earlier was out of date
 
  • Like
Reactions: DigBar
I'm not saying to exploit will be the same as the xbox one

just pointing out that the 2020 tweet you shared earlier was out of date
Well, here is an up-to-date post.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20260502_212949_Reddit.png
    Screenshot_20260502_212949_Reddit.png
    531.4 KB · Views: 9
people said this for 13 years about the xbox one

yes I understand sciresm hasn't found anything (and he also isn't looking anymore anyway - he retired from the scene)

Edit:

View attachment 571064
I will be sure to return here in 13 years.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20260502_215424_Calendar.png
    Screenshot_20260502_215424_Calendar.png
    342.9 KB · Views: 6
Last edited by FernandoRocker,
it does have relevance

systems with less interest will have fewer people looking to exploit them

ask yourself why there aren't chinese IQ exploits
These are not the number of hackers for each platform. These are the number of consumers who bought a system to play on. You're trying to equate the number sold to some theory about a system's ability to be hacked, or that for every set number of consumers, there is at least one hacker among them trying to find an opening. That's not how it works at all.

Besides, this list only shows 10 platforms. What about the rest of them? Were they less hackable? Or perhaps fewer people interested in hacking them? There's no correlation here, only an assumption based on poor logic.
 
These are not the number of hackers for each platform. These are the number of consumers who bought a system to play on. You're trying to equate the number sold to some theory about a system's ability to be hacked, or that for every set number of consumers, there is at least one hacker among them trying to find an opening. That's not how it works at all.

Besides, this list only shows 10 platforms. What about the rest of them? Were they less hackable? Or perhaps fewer people interested in hacking them? There's no correlation here, only an assumption based on poor logic.
I never claimed this was some 1:1 correlation

simply that there is more interest in the switch 2, related to more sales, which will naturally lead to more people looking at the system

you said it was totally irrelevant - but the fact is it does have some relevance here

(if you think I'm making some graph in my head with r2=1 then you've really missed the mark)
 
  • Like
Reactions: itnA and DigBar
I never claimed this was some 1:1 correlation

simply that there is more interest in the switch 2, related to more sales, which will naturally lead to more people looking at the system

you said it was totally irrelevant - but the fact is it does have some relevance here

(if you think I'm making some graph in my head with r2=1 then you've really missed the mark)
Again, you are equating the sales of a console to "people looking at it" when that's not how it works. A hacker doesn't just get enlightened to go looking into a system because of console sales. They have their own reasons. Their own motives. I mean, you seem to be suggesting that Wii U had less people interested in hacking it than XB1 (since it is not listed in that Top 10). And as it is, you seem to be dismissing what an actual hacker has already said about both the Switch and Switch 2.

Oh, and you might want to keep up on the actual hacking scene, since the iQue Player did get hacked. Maybe that was something "you're" not interested in.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: x65943
Again, you are equating the sales of a console to "people looking at it" when that's not how it works. A hacker doesn't just get enlightened to go looking into a system because of console sales. They have their own reasons. Their own motives. I mean, you seem to be suggesting that Wii U had less people interested in hacking it than XB1 (since it is not listed in that Top 10). And as it is, you seem to be dismissing what an actual hacker has already said about both the Switch and Switch 2.

Oh, and you might want to keep up on the actual hacking scene, since the iQue Player did get hacked.
"equating" I never claimed to equate anything

But if you think console sales has nothing to do with scene interest you are living in denial
 
"more sales -> more people looking". You are practically showing you are equating it.
Correlations can have varying degrees of strength

An example from human biology, the more older brothers a man has - the more likely that man is to be gay

This does not mean the 6th boy in a family will be gay (that would be equating the two, or saying there is a correlation of 1)

This simply means there is increased chance (in this case a less strong correlation - e.g. 0.1)

Many factors go into console hacking - this is one factor. I'm not equating anything
 
  • Like
Reactions: itnA and DigBar
Correlations can have varying degrees of strength

An example from human biology, the more older brothers a man has - the more likely that man is to be gay

This does not mean the 6th boy in a family will be gay (that would be equating the two, or saying there is a correlation of 1)

This simply means there is increased chance (in this case a less strong correlation - e.g. 0.1)

Many factors go into console hacking - this is one factor. I'm not equating anything
The fact is, you are trying to say there's a relation of one to the other, when there is no actual proof of it. You are "assuming" there is. And we already have one known hacker who was interested in working on Switch NOT interested in working on Switch 2, throwing that entire assumption off.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum