In your previous message you condemned "removing a child's penis or breasts", but now you're talking of [reversible] "hormone-blocking to children" (more like early teens)
Do you really not see the difference?
The conservative slogan against "cutting child's penises" is a lie, and your group keep spreading it because have more emotional effect than the complex reality of teens starting a slow process that won't be irreversible until they make the big decissions as adults, a process they can stop if they decide so.
You have COMPLETELY missed my point if you think I support chemically altering CHILDREN to prevent them from sexual maturation, in case their FEELINGS don't align with physical facts.
I am okay with circumcision based on its aesthetics later in life, and the reduced risk of transmission of STDs, and the fact that most males in America ARE circumcised, which would make it a bit easier for them later in life when their genitals will actually matter.
In no way do I support the fantasy of "gender reassignment" or "gender-affirming therapy". If gential mutilation is done for the purpose of mangling a penis or vagina into a fake version of its opposite, I could not be more firmly opposed, especially when it relates to CHILDREN whom are not mature enough to make this decision.
There is absolutely zero health benefits associated with genital mutilation for the purpose of pretending to be the opposite gender. Remember that there are only two genders, and they can never, ever, ever, ever, EVER be changed, not by surgery, not by self-identification, not by chemicals. XX can never be XY. Period. End of story.
Circumcision is not in the same category, although it still relates to a form of genital mutilation. The difference is, there ARE health benefits associated with circumcision, along with societal norms, and for a lot of people, adherence to genuine beliefs and religious practices, which most people believe should be respected.
Circumcision does not harm anyone. Mutilating your genitals for any other reason ABSOLUTELY does.
I was pointing out that a lot of people who believe the T in LGBT is actually legitimate are the ones who are adamantly against circumcision. Merely pointing out the rampant hypocrisy of the gender-fluid, when it comes to what is right or wrong for a child to be subjected to.
I just wonder why so many people are mad about male circumcision, but they have no problem with a male child literally chopping off his entire penis, not just trimming the foreskin, so he can be a better fake version of what his chromosomes prevent him from ever being.
One of these things is not like the other. One of these things just doesn't belong. If circumcision causes you outrage, why not "gender reassignment"? Where do you draw the line?
If you are against circumcision, but you support "gender reassignment" by means of surgery... I think you are a very, very confused individual, and I hope you never become a surgeon.
