You wouldn't have to worry about that if you had anything viable to say that wasn't stemmed in emotion or overanalyzing the vernacular and structure of ones words when you clearly understand the point.
Probably because that's not a standpoint I made. I think every pregnancy is valuable to those who care about the baby. I implied, several times, that pro lifers only advocate forced birth because they equate pregnancy with being valueless unless they can gain something from it, a capitalistic ideal.
Every response you ask for something different and then when I present something you don't like, you ignore it and ask for more. You're not even trying to debate the topic anymore, you're just mad that you can't have the last word.
The only interaction you've had with me on this thread is the constant struggle of you trying to formulate an argument with me based on your fabrications of my intent based on your bastardization on the context I presented my arguments in. Sit down, Aristotle, not everyone you meet is blind to your play on diction to prove your worth.
Is it only when you fabricate people's points and posts to prove you're intellectually fit to sit at the table?
Where's the value then?
I posted 3 lines, two of which were questions. I'd like some of that accuracy you advertised, please.
Except for women, right?
And I'll like it again and again. Because, yet again, you ignore context and facts in favor of pushing your own agenda. Never mind the post I started toward
@smf or my explanation, what's important is my like.
Thought bandwagoning didn't work on you? Or is hypocrisy just another play on your book on subjugating women?