mods are supposed to moderate, but this dude always aggravate every single post he takes part in.This is the sort of comments we get from mods...
mods are supposed to moderate, but this dude always aggravate every single post he takes part in.This is the sort of comments we get from mods...
Grow a sense of humour, maybe. Or at least read the whole exchange, maybe then you’ll pick up that it’s a pretty obvious joke.This is the sort of comments we get from mods...
I just post what I think - it’s not my fault people are oversensitive.mods are supposed to moderate, but this dude always aggravate every single post he takes part in.
Grow a sense of humour, maybe. Or at least read the whole exchange, maybe then you’ll pick up that it’s a pretty obvious joke.
It sounds like a fun Friday.You, Foxi4, like to sexually take little children from the back, but we should go easy on you because you are mentally incapacitated and have no idea about what you say or do.
Does it sound like a joke?
You are now defending guilt by association.If you play with fire, you sometimes get burned. The moral of the story is don't hang around with criminals, don't be a criminal and if you are a non law abiding person - be prepared to face the consequences of your own actions. Also accidents sometime happen....
@Xzi made a joke about Kavanaugh and Clarence. I made a joke about Biden as a rebuttal. You came in, out of nowhere, and started clutching pearls over something that is obviously said in jest. I don’t know what to tell you, lighten up? Nobody is seriously accusing anybody of any crimes, and you would know that if you followed the conversation. I don’t care about this enough to have a discussion about it with you.I want mods to keep a good and inclusive level of discourse in the forum, not allow anything and get as low or worsen the level of idiotic comments. It doesn't sound like a joke to me.
I don’t know what to tell you
I was quite clear in that if you hang about with criminals and are suspected of being part of their criminal exploits - don't start crying when you face the consequences (intended or otherwise). I have zero sympathy for those people. The law is too soft on them, luckily I am not in charge becuase I'd make Hitler look like a boy scout, if the justice system was in my control there would be no criminals to commit crimes as they would all be shot or used for slave labour until they had paid back what they owed to society. I am not an eye for an eye type bloke - more of a two eyes for an eye. One for revenge and one for the one that you thought it would be ok to take from someone else. Also I don't care what colour the criminal is - I'd treat them equally as harsh.You are now defending guilt by association.
Whatever makes you feel better, buddy. Do you have something to add to the thread?You don't know what to tell me because you know I'm right, and you don't want to admit it.
Examples are examples. Doesn't have to happen a lot to be a problem, especially in cases like this.I keep seeing and hearing people say this phrase on tv and the internet and the one thing i have to ask is WTf do you think u need to add incest as one of the reason....is it really running that rampent in your area that it is a huge problem....where im from that shits kind of frowned apon.
ThisI was quite clear in that if you hang about with criminals and are suspected of being part of their criminal exploits - don't start crying when you face the consequences (intended or otherwise). I have zero sympathy for those people. The law is too soft on them
To be fair I never agreed with the mandated vaccines, as they weren't true "vaccines" to begin with. They were mRNA sequenced injections meant to reduce the risk of hospitalization - not to decrease infection. While you do have a point; it isn't as much of a "gotcha" as you would think, because most people here can agree that forcing someone to take a vaccine, especially when it doesn't reduce infection risks isn't the way to go, as it should still be a choice to take it.
because most people here can agree that forcing someone to take a vaccine, especially when it doesn't reduce infection risks isn't the way to go
I'm welcome to be proved wrong, as I never stated I was right - there is a vast difference between abortions and vaccines as like another user said; they're meant to prevent the spread of viruses which can impact thousands of people, if not entire nations. It's more acceptable to have a vaccine be given to you to decrease that, than to have abortions revoked because that only impacts the select few involved - as @SyphenFreht stated.You're in for a rude awakening.
All of this is correct. Daily reminder that once voter suppression was alleviated we saw historic voter turnout, to the point Texas almost went blue this election. Not that I like either party, mind you, but the Republicans are objectively and metaphysically evil in literally every possible way.I'm going to keep repeating this, the majority of people did not want Roe v Wade over turned. The Republican party, are acting like tyrants. The Republican party is a minority party, who could only one through undemocratic means, such as never wining the popular vote for the last 20 years, but instead heavily gerrymandering to over represent themselves. Abused the senate to create a super majority within the supreme court.
There is no "your in for a rude awakening" because now no one has faith in this system anymore because of this.
We lost faith in our legislators years ago. Many of us lost faith in the police. And now, the highest court in the land, the part that is higher than the president, senate and house, just overturned a fundamental right.
I do not see this going well for longevity of the States.