Hacking Proof TX used code stolen from #reswitched

[Kioku]

And Nintendo did most of the work by providing games in the first place, but I don't see many people here defending their work.
#DoubleStandards

... Because this isn't about stealing Nintendo's work, now is it?

 

[Deleted-452294]

And Nintendo did most of the work by providing games in the first place, but I don't see many people here defending their work.
#DoubleStandards

I do not approve of piracy in any way.

 

[kumikochan]

"A large amount" is relative compared to the amount of people attempting the RCM exploit.
Nintendo could ban people for using the WebKit exploit as well, and quite easily considering it generates error codes that aren't official, which do get saved, as far as I'm aware.

Not a single case of people getting banned using the webkit exploit and like I said I use it almost every day since the webkit exploit got released and not banned

 

[Deleted-452294]

Not a single case of people getting banned using the webkit exploit and like I said I use it almost every day since the webkit exploit got released and not banned

Of course, no one has been banned for using the WebKit exploit, yet. I'm only saying they could change that in the future.
Again, I do not believe that RCM mode is the root cause of bans.

 

[kumikochan]

Of course, no one has been banned for using the WebKit exploit, yet. I'm only saying they could change that in the future.
Again, I do not believe that RCM mode is the root cause of bans.

Well I can't proof it and you can be right but I believe RCM is the culprit. Could be wrong but that's how I look at it since no bans using the webkit exploit

 

[Zonark]

Reswitched is anti piracy and most of them hate tx so they would never work with tx. I think they already knew that somebody was eventually going to steal and sell their code.

Anti piracy? Why would they even release something then at all?

 

[Robman2122]

Not a single case of people getting banned using the webkit exploit and like I said I use it almost every day since the webkit exploit got released and not banned

How can someone know if they're banned from using the webkit exploit if they're on an older FW version and not connecting online?

Sent from my ASUS_P00J using Tapatalk

 

[Draxzelex]

Anti piracy? Why would they even release something then at all?

Contrary to popular belief, there is a difference between something that inherently enables piracy (even if its not explicitly stated) and releasing a backup launcher. I guess fellow hackers and big name tech companies care if your name is directly associated with piracy.

 

[kumikochan]

How can someone know if they're banned from using the webkit exploit if they're on an older FW version and not connecting online?

Sent from my ASUS_P00J using Tapatalk

By using the same account on multiple systems plus there are some websites you can only acces if ur not banned to check if ur banned and I am connected otherwise I could not use the webkit exploit plus people also have been banned on lower firmwares using RCM

 

[deinonychus71]

... Because this isn't about stealing Nintendo's work, now is it?

Yes it is, SX is sold on the premise of enabling piracy. Let's be honest for a second.
So obviously, if they're making money on people stealing stuff, it should be obvious to anyone they'd steal stuff from other teams as well.

 

[the_randomizer]

What's going to happen now, are they going to throw in the towel and ragequit like a WOW addict?

 

[Ev1l0rd]

What's going to happen now, are they going to throw in the towel and ragequit like a WOW addict?

Considering theyre practically GW, theyre gonna continue to peddle their shit and lure in unsuspecting users. Don't expect that to change.

The only thing you can expect to (maybe) happen is a DMCA complaint to their hosting provider, unless that one is also hosted in china (dunno haven't checked that).

 

[Kioku]

Yes it is, SX is sold on the premise of enabling piracy. Let's be honest for a second.
So obviously, if they're making money on people stealing stuff, it should be obvious to anyone they'd steal stuff from other teams as well.

We're not discussing stealing Nintendos work to sell as your own. Please pay attention before providing needless input. Thank you.

 

[the_randomizer]

Considering theyre practically GW, theyre gonna continue to peddle their shit and lure in unsuspecting users. Don't expect that to change.

The only thing you can expect to (maybe) happen is a DMCA complaint to their hosting provider, unless that one is also hosted in china (dunno haven't checked that).

If it's in China, they won't even care to comply, Chinese hacking groups have zero care about legalities.

 

[MasterChief_Sierra117]

Yes it is, SX is sold on the premise of enabling piracy. Let's be honest for a second.
So obviously, if they're making money on people stealing stuff, it should be obvious to anyone they'd steal stuff from other teams as well.

So lemme get this straight, you're supporting thieves and then retaliating because other people(on this forum) are against their practices? Then you go so far, as to try to justify their thievery by drawing parallels to what's been going on at the homebrew scene. Please kindly get lost and don't voice your invalid rationalizations. Thank you.....

 

[tivu100]

And Nintendo did most of the work by providing games in the first place, but I don't see many people here defending their work.
#DoubleStandards

Do modders claim they create the games from scratch, or they explicitly stated it's a mod?

If it's in China, they won't even care to comply, Chinese hacking groups have zero care about legalities.

I don't think there would be ever be a way to enforce a fair play on these Chinese thieves (there are some reputable ethical Chinese homebrew hackers so I wouldn't genaralize them). They need to be called out those with their false claim of developing thing independent from scratch.

 

[MrGizMo]

So did TX react to any of this?

 

[Deleted User]

Sorry, but your wrong. Atmosphere follows gpl Which states
"The GPL does not require you to release your modified version, or any part of it. You are free to make modifications and use them privately, without ever releasing them. This applies to organizations (including companies), too; an organization can make a modified version and use it internally without ever releasing it outside the organization. But if you release the modified version to the public in some way, the GPL requires you to make the modified source code available to the program's users, under the GPL. Thus, the GPL gives permission to release the modified program in certain ways, and not in other ways; but the decision of whether to release it is up to you. Can I have a GPL-covered program and an unrelated nonfree program on the same computer? (#GPLAndNonfreeOnSameMachine) Yes."

Nice

 

[guily6669]

People here keep saying that TX "stole" the code for profit. SX OS is free. It's the backup loader that's not.

Well maybe because what everyone say its free you already had for a long time free on the Switch...

Everyone buying TX OS is purely for backups and its exactly the only option most need.

I my self still havent tried a single thing on my Switch as I only really want is a emunand environment and not a mess of things modifying my nand all the time.

 

[whoIsAndrej]

Someone explain why I should care?

Your signature is quite ironic.

"the problem with democracy is every stupid idiot gets a vote"