Method to tell if a Wii can install BootMii as boot2 from the outside

Rewritten as of July 29th, 2025, as the original version of this post was made with less knowledge than we have now.

WHEN I TALK ABOUT "RVL-REGION/RVL-USA", ETC, I DO NOT MEAN THE MODEL NUMBER (EX. RVL-001). THIS HAS TO BE HERE OR ELSE PEOPLE WILL BE CONFUSED.


As far as we know, Nintendo started shipping Wiis with a patched boot1 around August-September 2008. This has led to a search of trying to find a way to easily tell which Wiis are compatible and which ones aren't, so here I've written a post that should help you identify which Wiis have a vulnerable boot1 before buying them.

The guaranteed method works for Wiis in these regions:
USA
EUR
AUS
JPN

The secondary (although mostly accurate, not 100% accurate), only works on USA Wiis. Documentation might be provided for PAL/Japanese Wiis, but for those you can use the guaranteed (although far more recommended method)

GUARANTEED TO BE INCOMPATIBLE:
  • NON WHITE WIIS (BLACK/RED/BLUE)
  • WIIS WITHOUT GAMECUBE PORTS (WII FAMILY EDITION, WII MINI), RESPECTIVELY MODEL NUMBERS RVL-101/RVL-201
  • (USA ONLY) LU6+ (not LU64), any serial number LU6XXXXXXXX or above
If the Wii you are looking at meets the criteria above to be guaranteed to be incompatible, look for another Wii. You are most likely using this guide anyways because you don't have the Wii in your hands and you want to know before buying, which is what I recommend you do if you want a console compatible with BootMii@boot2.

How to find a GUARANTEED to be compatible console:
There is a -1 after "RVL-USA" added on Wiis produced slightly before patched boot1 consoles started being shipped out. This does mean there are consoles with the -1 that are compatible, but since we have yet to figure out what the -1 actually means (hell, refurbished consoles by Nintendo produced after the patched boot1 released don't have the -1, even if the Wii originally had the -1 before being refurbished by Nintendo), we can't tell why it was added, but we can take advantage of it to know if the Wii was produced before or near/after the patch. This is why we fall back to the second method if the console is USA, else you take a gamble if it fits under the potentially compatible criteria above.

Notice the -1 that is added on later Wiis, If the -1 is NOT there, and it is one of the regions listed above, the Wii is guaranteed to be compatible, 100% WITHOUT A DOUBT. This means the Wii is compatible, 100%. Congratulations!
1753837122150.png

1753837189855.png



if you see a -1, this is where it gets more complicated:
Non USA: It's a gamble. (for now)
USA: Look at the serial number. If the serial number is LU35 or under, then it should be compatible. If the serial number is a low LU58, it might be compatible, but isn't worth the risk, it's recommended to just get one without the -1 by far if you want a Wii with BootMii@boot2.
 
Last edited by Aep,
Fascinating! I've wondered about this for a few years now. My own Wii console has the LU58 serial code. I wonder where the cutoff point is for them to start shipping with the patched boot1. Mine seems to match the description for "lower LU58s". It's got the "USA-1" as well.

Mine has the vulnerable boot1.
 

Attachments

  • 20250823_153825.jpg
    20250823_153825.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 44
  • Like
Reactions: Aep
Fascinating! I've wondered about this for a few years now. My own Wii console has the LU58 serial code. I wonder where the cutoff point is for them to start shipping with the patched boot1. Mine seems to match the description for "lower LU58s". It's got the "USA-1" as well.

Mine has the vulnerable boot1.
That is an interesting console for sure. Idk when the exact cutoff is. LU584 maybe?
 
Hey so my Wii came without the -1, and was boot1 patched so couldn't run boot2, shell looks way to clean to have been swapped... here's the log:

Wii System Info beta1running on IOS58 (v24.32)Console type: WiiConsole model: RVL-001(JPN)Console ID: 0704305fHollywood revision: 0x11Serial number: LJH117775327Console area: USABoot1 version: boot1c [patched]Boot2 version: 4Drive revision date: 2007/02/13DVD support: YesSystem menu 4.3U (v513) running on IOS80Priiloader is installedHomebrew channel "LULZ" installed, revision 1.2, running on IOS5845 IOSes are installed.7 of these IOSes are stubbed.IOS4 (v255.0): StubIOS9 (v4.10): No patchesIOS10 (v3.0): StubIOS11[60] (v65535, ModMii-IOS60-v6174): Signature patch, ES_Identify, FS permissionsIOS12 (v2.14): No patchesIOS13 (v4.8): No patchesIOS14 (v4.8): No patchesIOS15 (v4.8): No patchesIOS16 (v2.0): StubIOS17 (v4.8): No patchesIOS20[60] (v65535, ModMii-IOS60-v6174): Signature patch, ES_Identify, FS permissionsIOS21 (v4.15): No patchesIOS22 (v5.14): No patchesIOS28 (v7.15): No patchesIOS30[60] (v65535, ModMii-IOS60-v6174): Signature patch, ES_Identify, FS permissionsIOS31 (v14.24): No patchesIOS33 (v14.24): No patchesIOS34 (v14.24): No patchesIOS35 (v14.24): No patchesIOS36 (v14.24): No patchesIOS37 (v22.31): No patchesIOS38 (v16.28): No patchesIOS40[60] (v65535, ModMii-IOS60-v6174): Signature patch, ES_Identify, FS permissionsIOS41 (v14.23): No patchesIOS43 (v14.23): No patchesIOS45 (v14.23): No patchesIOS46 (v14.23): No patchesIOS48 (v16.28): No patchesIOS50[60] (v65535, ModMii-IOS60-v6174): Signature patch, ES_Identify, FS permissionsIOS51 (v19.0): StubIOS52[60] (v65535, ModMii-IOS60-v6174): Signature patch, ES_Identify, FS permissionsIOS53 (v22.31): No patchesIOS55 (v22.31): No patchesIOS56 (v22.30): No patchesIOS57 (v23.31): No patchesIOS58 (v24.32): USB 2.0IOS60[60] (v65535, ModMii-IOS60-v6174): Signature patch, ES_Identify, FS permissionsIOS61 (v22.30): No patchesIOS70[60] (v65535, ModMii-IOS60-v6174): Signature patch, ES_Identify, FS permissionsIOS80[60] (v65535, ModMii-IOS60-v6174): Signature patch, ES_Identify, FS permissionsIOS222 (v255.0): StubIOS223 (v255.0): StubIOS249[57] (v65535, d2x-v6): USB 2.0 (ehcmodule), Signature patch, ES_Identify, FS permissionsIOS250 (v255.0): StubIOS254 (v255.1): BootMii IOSBC v6MIOS v10
Post automatically merged:

Hey so my Wii came without the -1, and was boot1 patched so couldn't run boot2, shell looks way to clean to have been swapped... here's the log:

Wii System Info beta1running on IOS58 (v24.32)Console type: WiiConsole model: RVL-001(JPN)Console ID: 0704305fHollywood revision: 0x11Serial number: LJH117775327Console area: USABoot1 version: boot1c [patched]Boot2 version: 4Drive revision date: 2007/02/13DVD support: YesSystem menu 4.3U (v513) running on IOS80Priiloader is installedHomebrew channel "LULZ" installed, revision 1.2, running on IOS5845 IOSes are installed.7 of these IOSes are stubbed.IOS4 (v255.0): StubIOS9 (v4.10): No patchesIOS10 (v3.0): StubIOS11[60] (v65535, ModMii-IOS60-v6174): Signature patch, ES_Identify, FS permissionsIOS12 (v2.14): No patchesIOS13 (v4.8): No patchesIOS14 (v4.8): No patchesIOS15 (v4.8): No patchesIOS16 (v2.0): StubIOS17 (v4.8): No patchesIOS20[60] (v65535, ModMii-IOS60-v6174): Signature patch, ES_Identify, FS permissionsIOS21 (v4.15): No patchesIOS22 (v5.14): No patchesIOS28 (v7.15): No patchesIOS30[60] (v65535, ModMii-IOS60-v6174): Signature patch, ES_Identify, FS permissionsIOS31 (v14.24): No patchesIOS33 (v14.24): No patchesIOS34 (v14.24): No patchesIOS35 (v14.24): No patchesIOS36 (v14.24): No patchesIOS37 (v22.31): No patchesIOS38 (v16.28): No patchesIOS40[60] (v65535, ModMii-IOS60-v6174): Signature patch, ES_Identify, FS permissionsIOS41 (v14.23): No patchesIOS43 (v14.23): No patchesIOS45 (v14.23): No patchesIOS46 (v14.23): No patchesIOS48 (v16.28): No patchesIOS50[60] (v65535, ModMii-IOS60-v6174): Signature patch, ES_Identify, FS permissionsIOS51 (v19.0): StubIOS52[60] (v65535, ModMii-IOS60-v6174): Signature patch, ES_Identify, FS permissionsIOS53 (v22.31): No patchesIOS55 (v22.31): No patchesIOS56 (v22.30): No patchesIOS57 (v23.31): No patchesIOS58 (v24.32): USB 2.0IOS60[60] (v65535, ModMii-IOS60-v6174): Signature patch, ES_Identify, FS permissionsIOS61 (v22.30): No patchesIOS70[60] (v65535, ModMii-IOS60-v6174): Signature patch, ES_Identify, FS permissionsIOS80[60] (v65535, ModMii-IOS60-v6174): Signature patch, ES_Identify, FS permissionsIOS222 (v255.0): StubIOS223 (v255.0): StubIOS249[57] (v65535, d2x-v6): USB 2.0 (ehcmodule), Signature patch, ES_Identify, FS permissionsIOS250 (v255.0): StubIOS254 (v255.1): BootMii IOSBC v6MIOS v10
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aep
LU56 - LU57 also have the -1 suffix and are ALL unpatched, same with the early LU58s. I don't know when the cutoff is, all I know is LU586 is patched. My newest U58 that is unpatched is LU582. Haven't acquired a 583, 584, or 585 yet... possibly LU585 is the cut off.

I've also seen LU344s WITH the -1 suffix, but LU345s WITHOUT it. Quite strange - both are unpatched. I think late 345 or 346 is the cut off.

I don't think this suffix is the best way to determine boot1 venerability. I guess without it it's guaranteed to be - but there's a still a lot that are vulnerable with it. Oops - seems you pointed this out already. Sorry.
 
Last edited by NickArchiver52,
Our next step is to figure out what the fucking -1 means.
Post automatically merged:

LU56 - LU57 also have the -1 suffix and are ALL unpatched, same with the early LU58s. I don't know when the cutoff is, all I know is LU586 is patched. My newest U58 that is unpatched is LU582. Haven't acquired a 583, 584, or 585 yet... possibly LU585 is the cut off.

I've also seen LU344s WITH the -1 suffix, but LU345s WITHOUT it. Quite strange - both are unpatched. I think late 345 or 346 is the cut off.

I don't think this suffix is the best way to determine boot1 venerability. I guess without it it's guaranteed to be - but there's a still a lot that are vulnerable with it. Oops - seems you pointed this out already. Sorry.
iirc I have a 584 or 585 that is unpatched? Ill check later
 
Our next step is to figure out what the fucking -1 means.
Post automatically merged:


iirc I have a 584 or 585 that is unpatched? Ill check later
I do believe it started with LU560 (at least for the 5s - 3s idk) My 560 has it but my 557 does not. I haven't seen a 558 or 559 to prove it though. No idea what it means, but it might correlate with something with the disc drive? My 560 had a - for lack of better word - "not shiny" disc clamp, but my 557 had the older "shiny" one, if you know what I mean. Was also thinking Hollywood AA but the 560 with -1 had the original Hollywood (which has terribly failed lol)
 
Last edited by NickArchiver52,
For Japanese Wiis, I think they got -1 added around the same time as USA consoles. MY LJF133 & 135 don't have it, but I've seen LJF142 that does have it. My 133 and 135 are late boot2 unpatched consoles.

Also would update the first post because to my knowledge ALL LU35s are patched. LU349s came with 20s and are patched.
 
For Japanese Wiis, I think they got -1 added around the same time as USA consoles. MY LJF133 & 135 don't have it, but I've seen LJF142 that does have it. My 133 and 135 are late boot2 unpatched consoles.

Also would update the first post because to my knowledge ALL LU35s are patched. LU349s came with 20s and are patched.
LU35 is known to be patched, yes.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum