Greta Thunberg banned from Venice for dying Canals green

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cranesbill
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 5,579
  • Replies Replies 120
  • Likes Likes 5
  • Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions. Saying NO to fascists/nazis - if you are one of those, you are not welcome here
Then do it professionally, no one's gonna take you seriously if you're a nuisance to random citizens

They do

A lot of people don't give a fuck until they get annoyed by something. It pulls attention, like you right now giving this news part of your time and ours
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sicklyboy
The planet is not going to die because a bunch of activist decided to temporally paint a canal green (Assuming the dye is indeed eco-friendly. If they messed that up then yeah weird stuff)

Either way this type of stunts need to be more and more polemic and eccentric because the more time it passes the more people seem to not even blink at the idea of how we are walking the path to our anhilation
It still harms the planet, no it does not mean the planet will die. The point is that an activist against pollution still caused harm even with "eco-friendly" dye. Pollution impacts DMS, this dye impacts DMS in it's absurd quantity.
There are far more intelligent ways to go about making a government and it's people fear what will happen if they do not cave in to the need of fixing the environment.
 
No no no, a source directly tied to that image you posted. Please try to keep up, rather than scrabble Google to try to find sources that don't actually back your claim.

How embarrassing for you
Ignoring again that the riots was actually a big deal, you just wanna downplay everything caused by your party

You're so hooked on that one image you don't wanna stay on topic on the actual thread

https://azat.tv/en/supreme-court-ice-raids-debate/
https://theconversation.com/trump-h...people-now-he-has-the-pretext-to-do-so-258471
 
Wow, he re-shared the tabloid link from his first post while making no other conceivable point. Case closed I guess.
It proves my point, you're mocked by the public

How does one source become irrelevant after it's used once to you???
They do

A lot of people don't give a fuck until they get annoyed by something. It pulls attention, like you right now giving this news part of your time and ours
You chose to be here, my guy. I even left you alone after you said you didn't wanna be friends with me, but now it's my fault for taking part in putting news when everything else has been nothing, but Trump Trump Trump????
 
You misunderstand, this action harmed the environment more. It impacts the ability for DMS to be produced by phytoplankton. DMS is crucial for cooling the planet, it helps make clouds fuller and more reflective. This means less heat from the sun is absorbed by Earth. Which means the planet is being cooled; this is a good thing for the environment.

The color and sheer amount of dye blocks light from reaching organisms in the water; this negatively impacts the production of oxygen and DMS. The lack of oxygen further impacts the production of DMS.

Good intentions do not wave the harm this action caused. To raise awareness about pollution is to help prevent pollution. To cause environmental harm is to further pollution.
We need her crucified, that's all we have to do.
 
You chose to be here, my guy. I even left you alone after you said you didn't wanna be friends with me, but now it's my fault for taking part in putting news when everything else has been nothing, but Trump Trump Trump????

Way to not get my point

Yes, I choose to be here, because I acknowledge the fact the point of the stunt is pulling as much press and attention as possible, which at the very least is working right now

Nobody blamed you for anything and for the love of god dont bring personal issues because of something as frivolous as an interaction because of a news
 
HE REPLIED

I put the image and moved on to talk with people who are actually talking about the topic


You didn't even elaborate
You're pearl clutching a protest and "vandalism" on something far lesser than what you MAGA have been charged with and choose to ignore it. I'm calling out MAGA hypocrisy by your being hyper focused on this one action when you're side has and continues to demonstrate far far worse action.

So again, I don't care about your pearl clutching here because that's what you're doing. You're trying to point and say "look at how bad the left is behaving" whole ignoring your side's far worse (and proven behavior)

So maybe just shut the fuck up if this is how you're going to behave.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sicklyboy
It proves my point, you're mocked by the public

How does one source become irrelevant after it's used once to you???

Who gives a fuck about being mocked? It's a protest, of course there's going to be people mocking them. Look in the mirror to find one of those people. It still got you talking about it, didn't it?

The source was irrelevant from the get-go least of all because it's a tabloid.
 
Worth noting that “vandalism” is malicious damage or destruction of property. Thunberg clearly has no malicious intent and claims the dye is biodegradable and harmless. It’s not an act of vandalism.

I wish I lived in a world where people got as pissed off about the destruction of our planet as they do about the temporary colour of the canals of Venice.
 
Way to not get my point

Yes, I choose to be here, because I acknowledge the fact the point of the stunt is pulling as much press and attention as possible, which at the very least is working right now

Nobody blamed you for anything and for the love of god dont bring personal issues because of something as frivolous as an interaction because of a news
Yeah I can get the same attention by blowing up a delivery truck to protect the polar caps because of oil use, but it was just an olive oil truck, but that's okay my intentions were good. Viola I get a Nobel Peace Prize

You can't not tolerate the consequences you put by defending the little good deed you did which doesn't outweigh your impact

And I'm clearly being blamed if Sickly and Seltzer are switching this to a MAGA thread of the damage they did
You're pearl clutching a protest and "vandalism" on something far lesser than what you MAGA have been charged with and choose to ignore it. I'm calling out MAGA hypocrisy by your being hyper focused on this one action when you're side has and continues to demonstrate far far worse action.

So again, I don't care about your pearl clutching here because that's what you're doing. You're trying to point and say "look at how bad the left is behaving" whole ignoring your side's far worse (and proven behavior)

So maybe just shut the fuck up if this is how you're going to behave.
When did I say she was leftist?

idiot

You wanted to make this about MAGA, as always, and then tell me to shut up on a thread that I MADE and it was your choice to go and fuck around on my opinion about her decision, not your Democratic party

And only did I put that example because YOU were the one who started this unrelated debate

utter bullshit and you get away with this because Sickly is here liking any comment you say
Who gives a fuck about being mocked? It's a protest, of course there's going to be people mocking them. Look in the mirror to find one of those people. It still got you talking about it, didn't it?

The source was irrelevant from the get-go least of all because it's a tabloid.
ooh ooh yeah you're so right because you said so

You can make a protest work and not look like an annoying prick towards people minding their own business
Worth noting that “vandalism” is malicious damage or destruction of property. Thunberg clearly has no malicious intent and claims the dye is biodegradable and harmless. It’s not an act of vandalism.
I piss on a river, but still get fined because it's still damage to the river and what's living there, but it's okay because piss is natural and biodegradable, there's no chemicals that outta harm things if put in large quantities


You see how stupid it is now once I reapplied the same scenario

Did the government grant her permission to dump the dye to their public site? Is it an authorized nature? Is it artistic because you put this on the same level as graffiti??? NO
 
Yeah I can get the same attention by blowing up a delivery truck to protect the polar caps because of oil use, but it was just an olive oil truck, but that's okay my intentions were good. Viola I get a Nobel Peace Prize

My brother in Christ, you are comparing a temporary eco-friendly dye in already murky waters with a fucking bomb
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sicklyboy
Not interested in weird hypotheticals that are also nowhere near equivalent to biodegradable dye being poured into water.
Post automatically merged:

My brother in Christ, you are comparing a temporary eco-friendly dye in already murky waters with a fucking bomb
That
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum