But not always, if you go from NTFS to FAT32 and try to copy a double layer game, it won't work.btw if you use .wbfs files on fat or ntfs you can simply use windows to do the copying
But not always, if you go from NTFS to FAT32 and try to copy a double layer game, it won't work.btw if you use .wbfs files on fat or ntfs you can simply use windows to do the copying
Guys
I need help. I have a Green Power HDD WD30EURS and have tried everything to work with the Wii. I format 3tbb hdd with GPT Table and USB Loader and CFG dont recognize. I try to format the HDD with WBM but when i choose the drive, WBM recognize only 746 GB and i only put in this case 500 games. If anyone can help please a noob description so that I can do this HDD work. I try to use GPARTED to make only one big drive but the program does not allow.
Thanks in advance!!!
Dravial, this is no joke, just checked it myself..
In the top/right corner you should see a countdown for about 5-10 secs. and then a grey button that says skip appears...if you click that you go straight to the download site.
Does it make sense?Fig2k:
Would you be interested in adding verification of full ISO's against the redump.org database?
I don't know if it falls within your focus but I believe it would be a really cool addition to WBM.
It could generate an md5 hash and compare it to that of the database, like CleanRip does.
Just a suggestion.
Regards.
I don't see why it would not make sense. When you dump a disc, the only way to verify if the source ISO is perfect is against other dumps of the same disc. I don't know that all image management apps generate wbfs files or scrubbed ISO's in the same exact way, thus producing the same checksum, but you are the expert there. I completely agree that ultimately we would need a wbfs or scrubbed ISO database to save us the intermediate step of having to verify the ISO, but it can't hurt to have extra functionality, if fig2k were interested in it. That "if" is the key, as there would be no point for him to implement something he doesn't care about.Does it make sense?
The recommended kind of saving is in scrubbed mode. And this makes every checksum invalid.
If ever, we should think about an own data base for scrubbed images and therefor we need well defined rules about the different kinds of scrubbing.
I never have a complete dump, it's waste of space. I always have scrubbed dumps, so this kind of checksums make no sense for me.When you dump a disc, the only way to verify if the source ISO is perfect is against other dumps of the same disc.