The gay agenda! :O

Hyro-Sama

I'm from the fucking future.
Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
4,330
Trophies
2
Age
30
Location
After Earth
XP
3,613
Country
tumblr_mb7272YUwx1ro2d43.gif
 

BORTZ

DO NOT SCREENSHOT
Supervisor
Joined
Dec 2, 2007
Messages
13,243
Trophies
3
Age
34
Location
Pittsburgh
XP
16,018
Country
United States
You know there is a comic out there where Spiderman does MJ and his semen is radioactive and kills her?
If you're not sh*tting us, we do want to see it... :creep:

This must be the most hillarious thing in the world.
Why would i joke about that? lol

From the 12 dumbest spiderman plots ever.

12) Spider-man Kills Mary Jane with his Radioactive Semen, Spider-man: Reign

Spider-man: Reign is a four-issue mini-series by writer/artist Kaare Andrews that is forthrightly an attempt to wedge Spider-man into the equivalent of a Dark Knight Returns dystopian story. How forthright? Why, there is a character named “Miller Jansen” featured in the book. It seems that at no point did anyone involved sit down and think about whether or not grim n’ gritty Spider-man was at all a good idea, or what the point of such an endeavor would be. Somebody at Marvel just wanted old, dark future Spidey.

Where DKR is a trailblazing classic, Reign is a derivative little ball of failure. The plot is at heart a generic “Spider-man’s villains team up to kill him” story drenched in ridiculously maudlin post-9/11 fear-mongering. Set 35 years in the future, Reign has a hilariously ancient J. Jonah Jameson push an over-sixty Peter Parker into becoming Spider-man again. It’s all part of a bizarre, nonsensical scheme to defeat a fascist government that’s taken over New York. Along the way there’s nonsense involving robot zombie Dr. Octopus, a laser killer death web projected around New York, and an impossibly stupid Dubya stand-in who works for Venom-as-Dick-Cheney.

What makes Reign memorably stupid instead of just forgettable is the truly, fantastically ridiculous backstory the whole thing hinges on. Throughout the book, our aging Peter Parker keeps having deranged visions of his long-dead wife Mary Jane. Later we find out that it’s not enough for him to be wracked by guilt because he was out fighting crime when she died of cancer; no, he also had to cause her cancer. Specifically, Spider-man gave Mary Jane cancer by tragically shooting her up repeatedly with his horrible radioactive Spider-Semen. His horrible radioactive Spider-Semen.

gallery_109594_291_166176.jpeg

:arrow: Source
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

ProtoKun7

GBAtemp Time Lord Regenerations: 4
Former Staff
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
7,525
Trophies
2
Location
Gallifrey
XP
1,361
Country
United Kingdom
TANGENT TIME!







Im a practicing and believing Christian.
I do not agree that homosexuality is "correct" or whatever.
So what happens when i try to force my views on gays?

If my views tell me that lying, stealing, homosexuality, and other things are wrong and I accept people that lie, cheat, steal and such, but i dont accept the homo? Doesnt that just contradict everything i just said?

I forget where i was going with all this.
Get along people.
I was grown up Christan too,but that besides the point.

Are you saying you don't agree with homosexuality because of the Bible or yourself?

If yourself, why?

If the Bible, does it actually say that? Is that your, person reading it to you or the translator
interpretation?
It's actually directly mentioned.

Leviticus 18:22
22 “‘And you must not lie down with a male the same as you lie down with a woman. It is a detestable thing.


1 Corinthians 6:9,10
9...Do YOU not know that unrighteous persons will not inherit God’s kingdom? Do not be misled. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men kept for unnatural purposes, nor men who lie with men...will inherit God’s kingdom.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people

BORTZ

DO NOT SCREENSHOT
Supervisor
Joined
Dec 2, 2007
Messages
13,243
Trophies
3
Age
34
Location
Pittsburgh
XP
16,018
Country
United States
So it is directly mentioned.
Now i am willing to let the mention of Leviticus go... If we were to follow everything in Leviticus... id rather be dead. Seriously. Try reading it sometime. Anyways I mean we dont treat women and children the same way they did back then. So I dont think this one holds much weight.

The second one... Ok so thats pretty clear. So that says to me, "Homosexual actions are sins".

So that leaves me with two courses of action. One, I am now justified to believe that homosexual actions are a sin. What that does NOT justify, is telling people "Being gay will send you to hell". I guess if you are gay and dont practice homosexuality and are trying to stop or not act on your impulses, fine.
Two, I could just leave the religious banter out of it. I dont support homos, nor their actions, but like i said before, that doesnt mean i treat them as any less of a person. Both orientations are temped by lust and other things. whatever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    Sonic Angel Knight @ Sonic Angel Knight: @_@