Luma isnt dead sillyrednand will be better
and luma is dead now
Luma isnt dead sillyrednand will be better
and luma is dead now
you really think it's gonna stay that way?rednand will be better
and luma is dead now
you do realise that the current state of the github repo is only temporary, right ?rednand will be better
and luma is dead now
if reinand actually works why not bothWhy not use Luma?
Because that's redundant?if reinand actually works why not both
it's always good to have more choices
scared of making choices? it wouldn't hurt to try other things besides what we already haveBecause that's redundant?
How did you infer that I was intimidated in the slightest? I used ReiNand before Luma was even conceived, so it's not like it's something big and scary to me. They both essentially do the same thing, so why waste the space?scared of making choices? it wouldn't hurt to try other things besides what we already have
if not intimidated by having other choices then I don't see what the problem would be in having another option and space shouldn't be an issue.. having other options is always a good thing unless you're happy being like minded with a bunch of peopleHow did you infer that I was intimidated in the slightest? I used ReiNand before Luma was even conceived, so it's not like it's something big and scary to me. They both essentially do the same thing, so why waste the space?
The problem is that it's redundant. That's what I initially said. There's absolutely no point to having both ReiNand and Luma. It has nothing to do with closed mindedness or anything like that. And yes, space is an issue because I don't like wasting it on redundancies. I see no benefit to having both to flip-flop between. That's like having multiple Linux distributions installed just because you get bored with how one looks after a couple weeks. Pick one and stick with what meets your needs.if not intimidated by having other choices then I don't see what the problem would be in having another option and space shouldn't be an issue.. having other options is always a good thing unless you're happy being like minded with a bunch of people
The problem is that it's redundant. That's what I initially said. There's absolutely no point to having both ReiNand and Luma. It has nothing to do with closed mindedness or anything like that. And yes, space is an issue because I don't like wasting it on redundancies. I see no benefit to having both to flip-flop between. That's like having multiple Linux distributions installed just because you get bored with how one looks after a couple weeks. Pick one and stick with what meets your needs.
Why not use Luma?
That's an incredibly dumb analogy seeing as consoles tend vary greatly, and I was never arguing which one was better. Learn to read. If ReiNand shot off fireworks and Luma made tapioca, then I'd see the point to having both at the same time. As far as I'm aware, though, they don't and are essentially the same thing.That's like saying its good for a person to only be able to play video games on Xbox. People like choices. You don't think Reinand is for you. Don't use it.
That's an incredibly dumb analogy seeing as consoles tend vary greatly, and I was never arguing which one was better. Learn to read. If ReiNand shot off fireworks and Luma made tapioca, then I'd see the point to having both at the same time. As far as I'm aware, though, they don't and are essentially the same thing.
I use either NTR romfs redir/code patching or edit patches themselves, but fair enough... I use Luma for saltysd support for playing stuff like neos. ...
You say "forcing patches down the user's throat," but I honestly don't see the downside of the additional features - they're not intrusive and you won't even notice them. Genuinely curious about why they're an issue for you.Lol, my apologies sir. Trying to pay attention in class and skimmed. Yes there is little reason to dual boot luma and Reinand. That I agree. However Luma and Reinand have two totally different goals. Reinand is simplistic and has no unneeded patches. While Luma forces patches down the users throat, with no option to remove them. I dual boot Luma and Rei. I use Luma for saltysd support for playing stuff like neos. While Reinand is my main, because it has what I need in regards to patching. Nothing more.
Both work well lol. I just like smash selector a lot.I use either NTR romfs redir/code patching or edit patches themselves, but fair enough
I just like the option to not have some patches. Its why I really like corbenik. But Reinand has just the patches I use. Nothing more. To a normal user, I see why you would say you don't notice. I just say giving options is the best way to go. Over just forcing them on users. Who may or may not want them.You say "forcing patches down the user's throat," but I honestly don't see the downside of the additional features - they're not intrusive and you won't even notice them. Genuinely curious about why they're an issue for you.
You shouldn't have used Linux as an example to be honest.The problem is that it's redundant. That's what I initially said. There's absolutely no point to having both ReiNand and Luma. It has nothing to do with closed mindedness or anything like that. And yes, space is an issue because I don't like wasting it on redundancies. I see no benefit to having both to flip-flop between. That's like having multiple Linux distributions installed just because you get bored with how one looks after a couple weeks. Pick one and stick with what meets your needs.
Then you will like the next update.even though I can't use it due to the fact that I am a o3DS peasant.
Do people here have problems with reading comprehension or something? There are entirely too many "pick and choose" readers. My analogy about Linux is about how it's redundant to have multiple distributions installed for the sake of aesthetics. You're right; Linux is all about the ability to make many choices. You validated my point by saying that since it's redundant to install multiple distributions just for different appearances (which is what my example was).You shouldn't have used Linux as an example to be honest.
Linux is an example of many choices that might be redudant for some. You got a bunch of similar DE, a lot of forks of many different stuff, etc. It is funny that you say that Luma is redudant if ReiNAND works well while talking about Linux.
But hmm, sorry for hijacking your thread again, Rei. I am glad that ReiNAND will be back, as I like the concept behind it and how you try to make the code clean, even though I can't use it due to the fact that I am a o3DS peasant.