Politifact is actually pretty clear in its analysis:
https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/jul/21/black-lives-matter-marxist-movement/
The issue here is, if you just brand a movement 'marxist' - which republican ideologs do, you do that to discredit intention, bases on mostly structural misinformation in the general public, stemming from PR, again - on the left, and on the right.
Marxist to most people you are coining the message for is an ideologic term they'd think of synonymous with 'communist', which it is not. Then comes the followup, so what is it then? And the answers you could give would be 'its an ideological spectrum', or a viewpoint, or an historical ideology, or ...
If you cant discuss the meaning of those terms in action, but rather use them to come up with the as group identifications, your agenda is not 'lets have a discussion'.
Marxist can be anything from - capitalism needs co-regulation to, people should seize means of production and capital. 'Trained marxist' could be 'guy thats a little on the fringes of society, finding solace in a group of similarly a little off kiltered folks' (which is largely where political change comes from), and in the mind of another person its 'a communist kabal trying to destroy democracy'.
If discussion about those terms or ideas never becomes part of the public sphere (which is what media is needed for), everyone makes up their own explanation, and as we all know, they currently could be pretty extreme and devided.
From that link, and from my understanding pretty much confirms, the link I provided is correct about it being a Marxist. The link you provided they try to downplay it even if the founder admitted being a Marxist. Weather or not Marxism is either good thing or bad thing, keep in mind that their ideal most likely will not come to fruition, they be talking about taking down capitalism, which I do not seeing it being successful, at least not in the near future. Having a classless society will most likely not happen either.
Even without all of that: I do not like the idea of one race being superior then the others, I think all people of races should be equal. It appears that the movement is focusing on just one race and do not seem to care for the others. If a Caucasian is beat up or killed by a cop
*cricket sounds* and African American, all heck breaks loose.
Most up to date link I could find https://www.statista.com/statistics/585152/people-shot-to-death-by-us-police-by-race/
A while ago, I came to a realization that it is nearly impossible to change people mind about anything, so I am just merely posting some findings and let the people decide on what to do with them. They do not have to believe it or they can, it their choice.
Thank you for your write up, it has been informative.
Oh wow, I didn't realize this, and that explains why BLM is tied into the Democrat. Thank you for making it much clearer for me, especially the composition of BLM. I appreciate it.BLM is made up of various elements such as Antifa and Liberals that want to rip up our Constitution and replace it with socialism. You also have BLM funneling donations into the DNC. Then there's just some normal members that think they are doing the right thing. It's a mixture of sorts.