Pokemon is for babies

[Shakraka]

Enjoy your baby games, you babies.

On an unrelated note, I had the stomach flu all day yesterday. I ended up blowing chunks 3 times last night, and I spent all of today sleeping. Now my body is all sore from vomiting. Not to mention the poop soup. I'm feeling a lot beter now, though.

 

[syko5150]

i completely agree with you =P

 

[Dangy]

You got it all mixed up. Babies are for Pokemon, mang.

 

[TwoBladedKnight]

wait... so you're telling me that me and my girlfriend are babies?? HOLY CRAP!

 

[arecus2000]

Some people who are 20+ play Pokemon And don't dare call me a baby!

 

[robert91794]

http://www.dragonflycave.com/aapchildish.aspx

 

[ojsinnerz.]

Pokemon? dat gaem iz for BABIES ROFL

I play REL GAMES, man. Lik U kno. COD n HALO. Thos are teh shit awwww yeah LMAO




That sounds horrible bro. Hope you get better soon.

 

[Cermage]

brb while i play mature games for mature gamers such as my mature self.

 

[TwoBladedKnight]

I'm actually planning on buying heartgold and souls silver, ss for me and HG for the GF

 

[Twiffles]

The amount of lame Pokéman topics all saying the same thing blows my mind.

Also, at least you're getting better. Get well soon, ja.

 

[SamAsh07]

Babies or not, I play Pokemon -it's been 12-13 years since I started with Pokemon Blue- and on the other hand I play many mature games. So I don't get your opinion looool

P.S. BABIES DON'T PLAY GAMES, they play with toys, dun dun dun.


EDIT:- I always wanted to say this, I lol at ppl who say they play pokemon with their GFs, that blows my mind off, and questions come up: "lol you made a gf so u could trade with them POKEMANZ?!" "why not trade *stuff* *cough*?"

 

[Porygonal]

You people who say ''Pokemon are for babies'' are absolutely retarded,I like pokemon because it's an RPG monster catching game,it's just highly addictive.Plus the people who say that have probably never even played a single pokemon game,yet they judge it.Pretty ironic,huh?Because you could say many games are baby games just because of the way they look,but behind all the cute charms lies some hardass battling,try battling the elite four and the champ Cynthia on pokemon Diamond/Pearl if you don't believe me.Appearances are deceiving you know.Plus,who the hell CARES if it looks like a baby game?If it's a decent challenge and you enjoy playing it,isn't that all that really counts?And for the record,I'd rather play Pokemon any day rather than a piece of crap game like Halo.You're just trying to look ''grown-up'' and failing.

 

[Demonbart]

Yay, let's start a flame war by saying a game that a lot of people enjoy is forbabies!
Y0u, 51r, 4r3 50 1337 [/sarcasm]

 

[syko5150]

You people who say ''Pokemon are for babies'' are absolutely retarded,I like pokemon because it's an RPG monster catching game,it's just highly addictive.Plus the people who say that have probably never even played a single pokemon game,yet they judge it.Pretty ironic,huh?Because you could say many games are baby games just because of the way they look,but behind all the cute charms lies some hardass battling,try battling the elite four and the champ Cynthia on pokemon Diamond/Pearl if you don't believe me.Appearances are deceiving you know.Plus,who the hell CARES if it looks like a baby game?If it's a decent challenge and you enjoy playing it,isn't that all that really counts?And for the record,I'd rather play Pokemon any day rather than a piece of crap game like Halo.You're just trying to look ''grown-up'' and failing.

i used to play pokemon r/b/y/ and after that IMO its the same game over and over with a slightly modified story and some new pokemon the games other then that are the same and no just because the regions change doesnt mean its any different its not hard to offer the same crap but change the name...

 

[science]

BABIES. I WILL MASTER THE POKEMON BEFORE YOU, BABIES!

 

[Porygonal]

Well,I do agree with you on that... but it's still a decent game and not a baby game is all I'm saying.lol And hell,there are other games that are basically the same thing over and over with every installment but can still be enjoyable,take Dynasty Warriors for example,lol.And couldn't you pretty much say that about any game though?Take Final Fantasy for example... if they would've never made it into an action RPG,wouldn't it just kinda be like the same thing over and over with maybe a few differences here and there...?But I still don't think pokemon is not a baby game because I've actually played it.

 

[syko5150]

Well,I do agree with you on that... but it's still a decent game and not a baby game is all I'm saying.lol And hell,there are other games that are basically the same thing over and over with every installment but can still be enjoyable,take Dynasty Warriors for example,lol.And couldn't you pretty much say that about any game though?Take Final Fantasy for example... if they would've never made it into an action RPG,wouldn't it just kinda be like the same thing over and over with maybe a few differences here and there...?But I still don't think pokemon is not a baby game because I've actually played it.

well i dont care much for Dynasty Warriors so i wouldnt know if they keep making the same game over and over and which FF game is an Action RPG?the story is completely different in all the FF games sure in one way or another its always about saving the world but its completely different characters tons of different things in each game.

 

[Porygonal]

...Uh,didn't they start making FF into action RPG around the 11th one?I believe so,cuz I played that one,or maybe that was 12,but this really isn't Pokemon being repetitive since ANYONE who has played the games knows that,lol.But this is about it not being a baby game like alot of people might think,and they think that just because they play games like ''Halo'' that it makes them ''mature'' or ''cool'' and it doesn't,I've played more mature and bloody games and I play Pokemon too,so what?A game is a game,as long as it's enjoyable.

 

[Cermage]

someone's mad.

there's only been minimal differences with each generation besides new monsters in terms of battle mechanics. adding of new elements, moods, fleshing out of EV/IV's e.t.c, but nothing to change the gameplay majorly, you can still blaze through any of the games by just using the traditional cookie cutter elemental wheel.

but as for no one playing pokemon before? bahaha, i think you'd be hard pressed to find anyone on this forum who hasn't at least played R/b/y.

 

[syko5150]

...Uh,didn't they start making FF into action RPG around the 11th one?I believe so,cuz I played that one,or maybe that was 12,but this really isn't Pokemon being repetitive since ANYONE who has played the games knows that,lol.But this is about it not being a baby game like alot of people might think,and they think that just because they play games like ''Halo'' that it makes them ''mature'' or ''cool'' and it doesn't,I've played more mature and bloody games and I play Pokemon too,so what?A game is a game,as long as it's enjoyable.

no they never made it into action they gave you the ability to move around but its still turn based...i consider pokemon a baby game because its not really anything special about it and the other day someone was talking to me about shovelware being releasing the same thing over and over without changing anything so i said by that logic pokemon is the most popular shovelware ever and i prefer old school games on NES and SNES etc over graphical games but i mean they have to have a fun appeal...yes pokemon was fun the first time through on the gameboy but i mean if they release sequels at least try to make it completely different...