Nintendo's Next Home Console - 3D Support Ruled Out

[SPH73]

In bold just for you. It's relevant to the "Wii2" perhaps you ought to read the ENTIRE article next time.

I did. That's why I'm smart enough to know that this quote is NOT a confirmation of the Wii 2 as this topic claims.

QUOTE"We've not said publicly what the next thing for us will be in the home console space, but based on what we've learned on 3-D, likely, that won't be it."

If anyone thinks this is a "confirmation" they are completley stupid. Seriously what part of "We've not said publically" do you not understand?

And for the record, Nintendo's Reggie Fils-Aime has also said there will be no talk of "Wii 2" until after the current Wii passes 45 million in sales. (In the US)

Seriously this topic...

 

[SubliminalSegue]

I feel like this is very old news based off what I've heard for years.

This is basing off opinions of hearing what Nintendo has wanted to do since 2005. My friend and I have agreed that the Wii was a prototype. It's not what Nintendo really wanted to do. That said, I don't think Nintendo is a risk-taking company. That's been frequently shown with poor third party support and turning with the 3D tide. Not saying motion control wasn't a risk, but it's not the step they probably should've made.

Now for years, Nintendo has played around with the idea of holograms, (bring on the "holograms? You're an idiot) and for those who don't believe it's possible, do your research. I don't think it's financially smart right now, but it's the only way for Nintendo to not be seen as a follower. Nintendo has ran against the pack for a while now, it's strictly Microsoft vs. Sony, with Nintendo really competing against Apple right now. Nothing wrong with that. But if my suspicions about what Nintendo really wants come true, they would own E3. There's no way to come back to that kind of news. Sony and Microsoft would be stuck in their shitty little motion controller quagmire, and Nintendo would stand tall again. I WANT that to happen. But it won't. Because Nintendo isn't a risk-taking company.

One thing they ought to do is fire Reggie Fils-Aime. The man clearly has no idea what he's doing. I'd do his job for free and do a much better job than that joke. He's a poor promoter.

Regardless of what has been said, Wii2 is a codename. Like Revolution. They have never put a number after their name, it's always been something new. But I'm losing faith in the company that I've stuck behind for 22 years.

 

[worlok375]

In bold just for you. It's relevant to the "Wii2" perhaps you ought to read the ENTIRE article next time.

I did. That's why I'm smart enough to know that this quote is NOT a confirmation of the Wii 2 as this topic claims.

QUOTE"We've not said publicly what the next thing for us will be in the home console space, but based on what we've learned on 3-D, likely, that won't be it."

If anyone thinks this is a "confirmation" they are completley stupid. Seriously what part of "We've not said publically" do you not understand?

And for the record, Reggie has also said there will be no talk of "Wii 2" until after the current Wii passes 45 million in sales. (In the US)

Seriously this topic...

It's not a confirmation, who said that? The only mention of a confirmation (me and you only) would be you. Confirmation requires them to say the name (my definition) of the product. Oddly enough you changed the subject (most likely sub-consciously though) the topic mentions the wii2, you said there was no mention,obviously it is relevant to the wii2, as MaxConsole was only using that part of the article by CNN.

 

[machomuu]

In bold just for you. It's relevant to the "Wii2" perhaps you ought to read the ENTIRE article next time.

I did. That's why I'm smart enough to know that this quote is NOT a confirmation of the Wii 2 as this topic claims.

"We've not said publicly what the next thing for us will be in the home console space, but based on what we've learned on 3-D, likely, that won't be it."

If anyone thinks this is a "confirmation" they are completley stupid. Seriously what part of "We've not said publically" do you not understand?

And for the record, Reggie has also said there will be no talk of "Wii 2" until after the current Wii passes 45 million in sales. (In the US)

Seriously this topic...

It's not a confirmation, who said that?

The OP, the title of this thread reads:
QUOTE

Nintendo confirms Wii 2, rules out 3D support

 

[SPH73]

In bold just for you. It's relevant to the "Wii2" perhaps you ought to read the ENTIRE article next time.

I did. That's why I'm smart enough to know that this quote is NOT a confirmation of the Wii 2 as this topic claims.

QUOTE"We've not said publicly what the next thing for us will be in the home console space, but based on what we've learned on 3-D, likely, that won't be it."

If anyone thinks this is a "confirmation" they are completley stupid. Seriously what part of "We've not said publically" do you not understand?

And for the record, Reggie has also said there will be no talk of "Wii 2" until after the current Wii passes 45 million in sales. (In the US)

Seriously this topic...

It's not a confirmation, who said that?

The title of this very topic.

Or did you not read that either?

 

[ShadowSoldier]

Are you an idiot? HERE is the source article: http://www.maxconsole.net/content.php?4533...-out-3D-support
Taken directly from the FIRST POST. It has EVERYTHING TO DO WITH THE WII2.

By the way, this isn't 4chan.

You might want to point that accusation at yourself.

You didn't even bother to check their source. Max Console is taking their information out of context. And so close to April fools...

Here's the direct link to Max Console's "source"

http://edition.cnn.com/2011/TECH/gaming.ga...o.3ds/?hpt=Sbin

Wow, my faith in the intelligence of humanity has been severely diminished.

And you're the reason why the intelligence in humanity is so low.

 

[worlok375]

In bold just for you. It's relevant to the "Wii2" perhaps you ought to read the ENTIRE article next time.

I did. That's why I'm smart enough to know that this quote is NOT a confirmation of the Wii 2 as this topic claims.

QUOTE"We've not said publicly what the next thing for us will be in the home console space, but based on what we've learned on 3-D, likely, that won't be it."

If anyone thinks this is a "confirmation" they are completley stupid. Seriously what part of "We've not said publically" do you not understand?

And for the record, Reggie has also said there will be no talk of "Wii 2" until after the current Wii passes 45 million in sales. (In the US)

Seriously this topic...

It's not a confirmation, who said that?

The title of this very topic.

Or did you not read that either?

Oh, maybe you missed the part where I was only talking about my statements, oh, and yours, shame on you.

(the rolling is becoming trendy eh?)

 

[SPH73]

Back peddling. NO U. Hurr Durr. COPY PASTA. Emoticon.

Hmmm. Yes. Indeed.


QUOTE(SubliminalSegue @ Mar 30 2011, 08:38 PM) I feel like this is very old news based off what I've heard for years.

This is basing off opinions of hearing what Nintendo has wanted to do since 2005. My friend and I have agreed that the Wii was a prototype. It's not what Nintendo really wanted to do.

Actually the Wii mote was originally designed for the Nintendo GameCube. Sometime towards the end of that consoles lifespan Yamauchi said something like "were working on a new peripheral that will dramatically extend the lifespan of the GCN." However since the GCN was a dog and because it was limited by its tiny discs they decided to build an entirely new console around their new peripheral (aka the Wii mote.)

tl:dr = You're half right.

As for the rest of your post... 22 years? That's a long time to be a Nintendo fan. I guess this makes you in your early 30s?

 

[worlok375]

Back peddling. NO U. Hurr Durr. COPY PASTA. Emoticon.

Hmmm. Yes. Indeed.

Can't wait till I'm 120 and finally realize the truth behind the pure stupidity that has been each of your posts (except maybe the second one).

And with that, I bid you adieu, perhaps next time you'll make legitimate statements eh?

 

[SPH73]

Back peddling. NO U. Hurr Durr. COPY PASTA. Emoticon.

Hmmm. Yes. Indeed.

Can't wait till I'm 120 and finally realize the truth behind the pure stupidity that has been each of your posts (except maybe the second one).

And with that, I bid you adieu, perhaps next time you'll make legitimate statements eh?

Next time please point out exactly what troubles you in my posts. *slash*

Don't be mad. Just check your sources next time, don't read things out of context, don't accept anything at face value, and please do your own thinking. It's not that hard.

(wii x2, get it?)

Peace be with you.

 

[Densetsu]

The original title of this topic, "Nintendo confirms Wii 2" is based on this article from MaxConsole.

MaxConsole got its information from this CNN article.

In the CNN article, Reggie said that their next home console will not have 3D support. That's all he said. No official announcements have been made.

Bad journalism on MaxConsole's part. Honest mistake on the OP's part. Let's all be friends

 

[Celice]

Can the Wii 2 please be the NES rehashed. I would be so happy.

 

[ShadowSoldier]

Back peddling. NO U. Hurr Durr. COPY PASTA. Emoticon.

Hmmm. Yes. Indeed.

Can't wait till I'm 120 and finally realize the truth behind the pure stupidity that has been each of your posts (except maybe the second one).

And with that, I bid you adieu, perhaps next time you'll make legitimate statements eh?

Next time please point out exactly what troubles you in my posts. I've already shot down this entire topic with obvious logic and basic fact checking. As for the rest, you're just mad because you're one of the many people who took this topic seriously without checking the source. (And wound up looking stupid in the process.)

Don't be mad. Just check your sources next time, don't read things out of context, don't accept anything at face value, and please do your own thinking. It's not that hard.

(wii x2, get it?)

Peace be with you.

You're still coming off as an arrogant asshole.

 

[MelodieOctavia]

I'm glad we won't see 3D in the next console. It really doesn't make sense for gaming IMO.

 

[ShadowSoldier]

Sorry D9K (posted it before all the other posts were trashed).

Also, I agree. 3D does not belong in gaming. It's bad enough that developers already focus more on graphics and multiplayer than actual gameplay.

 

[Bladexdsl]

good i'm glad it doesn't have 3d it's just a gimmick anyway

 

[ManFranceGermany]

I don't think we will see Wii2 until at least the end of 2013 though. Also, we could see a lot of current 3D tv's becoming old rope very quickly thanks to the innovation of the glasses free 3DS screen. I read somewhere that all the major TV manufacturers R&D departments are frantically trying to become the first to make and release a glasses free 3D TV. Perhaps then would be the right time to release the Wii 2?

glass free tv could just be used by one person, at least if they use the same tech Nintendo used in the 3ds. The only other possibility would be holographic displays which, you guess it, are far from being ready. What we should also not forget is, that Nintendo just use a thing, if its ready for mass market. HD was, in their opinion not wide spread enough in 2006, so be sure, 3D TVs wont in 2013.

Im sure that the Wii 2 will be released latest in 2012.
Sales go bad in japan since last year and I'm sure they won't go up anymore, PS3 and PSP win a lot of ground, maybe with game like Zelda it will be better again.
In Europe sales are not bad, but xbox360 owns the wii since some month.
Its getting time Nintendo.

 

[FireGrey]

I thought they said something VERY similar to this last year :/

 

[Bladexdsl]

yep wii is pretty much dead now anyway and being chocked to death with sw only thing left on it is zelda. i wanna see what big n comes up with next...and how long it takes sony to steal it