I think the person you were quoting is exceptionally out of their depth when it comes to the relevant knowledge of healthcare economics if their closest point of reference are relative prices for video games across countries.
-
Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.
Joe Biden Wins - Becomes 46th president of the United States
- Thread starter yusuo
- Start date
- Views 435,156
- Replies 7,444
- Likes 45
- Status
I think the person you were quoting is exceptionally out of their depth when it comes to the relevant knowledge of healthcare economics if their closest point of reference are relative prices for video games across countries.
Title: Are most Americans overpaying for health care? A new study says yes — by a lot.
https://www.tampabay.com/health/are...a-new-study-says-yes-x2014-by-a-lot-20190513/
You could answer the question. It's a little funny, the removal of context of how I used it to criticize my supposed removal of meaning.
Got it. Something went wrong in OCR, so they had to do manual checkups on 65% of ballots. Seems a bit high for a working system, but hey.
So you get two people in a room, one representing every party, and go through the ballots (300 are in question?), and check them by hand.
(Slight problem that you do this based on scans and not on paper ballots (*jesus*) but lets say, not all that bad.)
Next year you throw out the voting system for good please...
Integrity of the vote still preserved.
-
Two comments - no failsafes on 'person voted for two people' is understandable, if you got elections, where more than one 'thing' can be checked per ballot. You want the system to work in that case as well.
No failsafes in case of 'nothing' checked on the ballot is understandable, because - well self explanatory really.
So now your main argument becomes - supervisor can override the votes.
Which means, you trusted the machine more, to get them right, than the humans running the election office? Which is the opposite of what Trumps lawyers said?
So now its not dominions machines changing the votes from Nicaragua, sorry Venezuela, now its the people that actually have to do the vote counting (adjudication) by hand?
Again - some of this comes down to -- 'problem sits in front of screen', and if you are too dumb to have democratic elections.
Also - the 65% error rate. Really means you should throw out the systems (if nothing was visibly wrong with those ballots). In fact, in general, just throw the stuff out and vote on paper ballets and count manually - then you have less layers that could go wrong, and at least everyone understands whats happening.
---
edit: Also, this:
Check the part how the software update caused the machines to change what votes were counted and for who.
"We estimate 1,474 votes changed across the two rolls, between the first and the second time the exact same ballots were run through the County Clerk’s vote counting machine - which is almost the same number of voters that voted in total."
"This demonstrates conclusively that votes can be and were changed during the second machine count after the software update. That should be impossible especially at such a high percentage to total votes cast."
Ah, yes. Thank you for making it clearer, makes much more sense now.
Only one way to find out is to wait and see, perhaps?
Are you serious... If you believe that there was corruption from high above that tampered with the software to change votes from republican to democrat...you got problems man... Why don't you just send Trump all of your hard earned money for his non-existing claims that will lose again in court. Friken conspiracy theories over here...
Are you serious... If you believe that there was corruption from high above that tampered with the software to change votes from republican to democrat...you got problems man... Why don't you just send Trump all of your hard earned money for his non-existing claims that will lose again in court. Friken conspiracy theories over here...
If a president can be corrupt, then why wouldn't be the system that enables corruption be free of it? The double-standard is already within your comment.
Also Dominion is a private company using closed source code. A lot smaller than any government, and a lot more susceptible to influence. It's quite literally a security risk by that metric, alone.
American government didn't become corrupt over night. It's been happening for decades, with everybody acknowledging it little by little. It's not miraculously clean just for this election.
Let's see now... Trump has not only failed in court to show any proof of voting fraud and on top of that let's add on the lawsuits that have been dismissed, withdrawn and or denied. He has racked up over 46 lawsuits that didn't result in anything. So your really going to tell all of us right now that you found proof showing that there was fraud.
Sure thing bud!
Oh and what nerve you have to insinuate that Joe Biden is corrupt... Who the F*ck do you think you are... You think he would have served as vice president for two terms and now become a president if there was any proof of wrong doing on his part. Your really screwed up man.
Last edited by White_Raven_X,
How many of those cases included Dominion in the suit? I'll let you count. Also, get better at English. It's annoying when people who don't understand words pretend that they have a superior form of logic.
Lol.
Last edited by tabzer,
And here you go again with your personal attacks because you think you are the best. Go be a teacher if your so good at spelling.
Oh and btw... Maybe you should read the rules here... Because personal attacks of any kind are not welcome!
I'm sorry? Just giving you the respect you offered me.
Are you serious... If you believe that there was corruption from high above that tampered with the software to change votes from republican to democrat...you got problems man... Why don't you just send Trump all of your hard earned money for his non-existing claims that will lose again in court. Friken conspiracy theories over here...
As a side note, I am better at it than you.
Last edited by tabzer,
@tabzer it's a well known fact that you don't have too many people's respect here, as you always end up attacking them personally and that's just not cool.
I respect everyone with the respect that they demonstrate. If you want to try to gang up on me with other illiterate people, go ahead. It'll only boost my case.
Relevant information, because irrelevant person tried to be above.
Check the part how the software update caused the machines to change what votes were counted and for who.
"We estimate 1,474 votes changed across the two rolls, between the first and the second time the exact same ballots were run through the County Clerk’s vote counting machine - which is almost the same number of voters that voted in total."
"This demonstrates conclusively that votes can be and were changed during the second machine count after the software update. That should be impossible especially at such a high percentage to total votes cast."
Got it. Something went wrong in OCR, so they had to do manual checkups on 65% of ballots. Seems a bit high for a working system, but hey.
So you get two people in a room, one representing every party, and go through the ballots (300 are in question?), and check them by hand.
(Slight problem that you do this based on scans and not on paper ballots (*jesus*) but lets say, not all that bad.)
Next year you throw out the voting system for good please...
Integrity of the vote still preserved.
-
Two comments - no failsafes on 'person voted for two people' is understandable, if you got elections, where more than one 'thing' can be checked per ballot. You want the system to work in that case as well.
No failsafes in case of 'nothing' checked on the ballot is understandable, because - well self explanatory really.
So now your main argument becomes - supervisor can override the votes.
Which means, you trusted the machine more, to get them right, than the humans running the election office? Which is the opposite of what Trumps lawyers said?
So now its not dominions machines changing the votes from Nicaragua, sorry Venezuela, now its the people that actually have to do the vote counting (adjudication) by hand?
Again - some of this comes down to -- 'problem sits in front of screen', and if you are too dumb to have democratic elections.
Also - the 65% error rate. Really means you should throw out the systems (if nothing was visibly wrong with those ballots). In fact, in general, just throw the stuff out and vote on paper ballets and count manually - then you have less layers that could go wrong, and at least everyone understands whats happening.
---
edit: Also, this:
Check the part how the software update caused the machines to change what votes were counted and for who.
"We estimate 1,474 votes changed across the two rolls, between the first and the second time the exact same ballots were run through the County Clerk’s vote counting machine - which is almost the same number of voters that voted in total."
"This demonstrates conclusively that votes can be and were changed during the second machine count after the software update. That should be impossible especially at such a high percentage to total votes cast."
Go to sleep .. it’s time to go back under your bridge..you can tell your ghost stories to scare little MAGAS, when you wake up
Ps. God bless the new President
Where's the personal attack? Seems like good life advice to me.
Yeah It's a joke, just another reason to slowly eradicate personal liberties. They'll be in our homes next. Well they already are, who doesn't have a phone connected to the internet.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- No one is chatting at the moment.
