If Stargate SG-1 was good, why didn't we have Stargate SG-2?

Flame

Me > You
OP
Global Moderator
Joined
Jul 15, 2008
Messages
7,316
Trophies
3
XP
18,985
Because SG-2 wouldn't be as good as SG-1.

047b2f0a3cf855adc4aeda35bc3aadf7.gif


Conspiracy !
 

iball

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
1
Trophies
1
XP
73
Country
Gambia, The
They actually did, they just didn't name it "SG-2". They called it "Stargate Atlantis". It did well enough, lasting for 5 seasons.
SG-3 aka "Stargate Universe" didn't do as well as either of its predecessors and was canceled after a single season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flame

Flame

Me > You
OP
Global Moderator
Joined
Jul 15, 2008
Messages
7,316
Trophies
3
XP
18,985
They actually did, they just didn't name it "SG-2". They called it "Stargate Atlantis". It did well enough, lasting for 5 seasons.
SG-3 aka "Stargate Universe" didn't do as well as either of its predecessors and was canceled after a single season.

in my Universe. 2 is after 1

812f12b57769fccfe9b3f7fb5e85b1dc.gif
 

Luke94

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2016
Messages
1,153
Trophies
0
Age
29
XP
1,645
Country
Poland
Who would be portraying role of colonel Jack O’ Neil nowadays? For instance Richard Dean Anderson or Chris Evans?…etc.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    B @ btjunior: i love sigma meals, skibidi slicers!!