The nature of the limitation was extremely hazy. Even SKY3DS seem confused about whether it is a feature or an issue. On the page, it's presented as a feature of the card. In their e-mails, an issue that can be resolved. In reality, a cheap neutering tactic in order to drum up more sales.
This is debatable. Accounting for the fact that their emails and website are not in Standard English, there is possible ambiguity. English is clearly not their first language, so their use of lexicon can't be taken to be a marker of their true intentions.
You could very well be right, but you cannot call them out on something like
'their intentions' that can't be proven.
People were especially confused about whether it was a "10 games at one time" situation or a "10 game EVER" situation. I would argue that most people would assume the former. SKY3DS did not stress the latter.
Here, have another look:
Read: it says "per Sky3DS card".
If people could be held liable due to what other people
insinuated about them, everyone would be liable for anything.
Sky3DS were under no obligation to stress anything - everything is stated (albeit in semi-Engrish). The semi-Engrish obviously didn't help with understanding exactly what Sky3DS was meaning to convey, but everything is stated nonetheless.
And they did, at no extra cost to consumers. It's almost as if that was a technical limitation rather than an intentional one.
They did. Are we discussing cost here? It is an undeniable
fact that Sky3DS are greedy. But that doesn't make them perpetrators.
And it being a technical limitation as opposed to an intentional one
is irrelevant. It was expressed beautifully by TVL:
I bought a 3DS game, and Nintendo only put one game on it, while they could have made it a multicart... they did this on purpose... I am now a victim.
The 10 limit was stupid and intentional, but you are not a victim because of it, because the limit was clearly stated, everyone knew. Now stop crying.
It
was stupid and intentional, but it was stated. Therefore, you are not a victim.
They felt taken advantage of. But hey, it's 100% their fault, right.
Buyer's remorse is a thing; it is absolutely 100% the buyer's fault. I feel the same way, thank you.