I'm not sure if I understand the question correctly, but...why not? Pretty much all USB loaders support "cIOS249", so if you install rev21 base IOS 58 in that slot...doesn't the game load?nando said:is there a USB Loaded that supports Rev21 Base 58 for loading games?
phillyguy said:i would like to install Custom IOSX Rev21 using the network installation.
Is this how I would do it:
- Copy Custom IOSX Rev21 to apps folder of SD Card
- Run the installer.
- Select the IOS version to use as base (default option recommended).
- Select "Network Installation".
That's all i need to do? and how do i check if it's rev21? Thanks
Waninkoko himself said hdd lag was fixed if you use base 58 with rev 21.nando said:i asked this on a another thread but no one seems to be looking. is there a USB Loaded that supports Rev21 Base 58 for loading games? someone claims that waninkoko fixed the hard drive lag in that cios.
yeah, you can install 58 under 249, but at least on wiiflow games won't load with that base. waninkoko said (well someone said he said) a bit of code needs to change in the loaders to load games with ios58.Wever said:I'm not sure if I understand the question correctly, but...why not? Pretty much all USB loaders support "cIOS249", so if you install rev21 base IOS 58 in that slot...doesn't the game load?
(or use another slot and tell your loader to use that slot instead)
QUOTE(nando @ Jan 14 2011, 10:03 PM)
I can confirm those findings. My HDD suffers the lag (controller disconnect) problem with cIOSx20/21 but works fine with cIOSx19.strapsoz said:rev21 Base 58 works with configurable usb loader. It must be installed as 249 (ie, you cant install as 248 and boot game from diff ios)
The controller lag is gone.
However has same compatibility issues with ashes cricket and my guess MHT, usb instr. aswell.
It is also alot slower than b57 and b56. (even in the loader the covers take time to buffer)
For people with controller lag issues
I would still recommend r19 b57 for majority of games and rev4 37 + 38 or rev 5.1 b37 for others.
This was with my setup so if someone else wants to test it out and confirm my findings that would be appreciated
also i have the same impressiondavebaol said:Well, my impression is usb2.0 support "stolen" from ios58 is a bit slower but more reliable.
Also I believe usb support in rev21 is the same for all bases because some hd not working properly with previous revs now works with every base.
He couldn't figure it out until someone else did the reverse-engineering work required and added it to libogc, allowing him to do his regular copy-paste job. That's what the code in his new USB module is (for which he hasn't released source code, despite promising he would via twitter).XFlak said:I thought this was rather odd, but I guess that's what it took for wanin to build a cIOS using IOS58 as a base (as some of u may remember, wanin tried making a base 58 cIOS in rev20 but couldn't figure it out at that time).
so would be a good choice this one?XFlak said:I haven't extensively tested cIOS with base 58, I just analyzed it so ModMii can recreate it in wad form.
As far as I'm concerned rev20 and rev21 with base 56 work perfectly for everything except COD:BO (triiforce doesn't work on rev20 either)
The only reason I would deviate away from these cIOSs is if they are having difficulties reading my hard drive, a different cIOS may have different compatability with different hard drives.