when parental mode is active, can you make it so that the settings and per-game settings screen are unavailable?
coolkensington said:Beardface, Developers, and OP: Thank you very much for this sexy cover flow interface. This update looks even more superb!!!
Edit: BTW, is there away to lock the "delete" option when clicking on the cover? (Sorry if it has already been discussed, and can you point me in the right direction for the info?)
Sledge1 said:Yes...
how do i check for a bad cover then? they all look the correct size and name to me..
Don't know then I'm afraid. I assume your running CIOS v10? For me once I replaced the bad covers it all started to work nicely.Sledge1 said:All images display correctly on the PC
Nullkill said:post a screenshot of your issue chaseincats.
Nullkill said:coolkensington said:Beardface, Developers, and OP: Thank you very much for this sexy cover flow interface. This update looks even more superb!!!
Edit: BTW, is there away to lock the "delete" option when clicking on the cover? (Sorry if it has already been discussed, and can you point me in the right direction for the info?)
A+B+1+2
Turns on parental mode.
Same for the "1-Click" boot option.kedest said:Nullkill said:coolkensington said:Beardface, Developers, and OP: Thank you very much for this sexy cover flow interface. This update looks even more superb!!!
Edit: BTW, is there away to lock the "delete" option when clicking on the cover? (Sorry if it has already been discussed, and can you point me in the right direction for the info?)
A+B+1+2
Turns on parental mode.
the loader doesn't seem to remember that option
if you enable it and exit and later go back to the loader, it's no longer active
At least one understood... I'm not alone!Skizzo said:I take it that it would have been really, really, REALLY hard for you to offer some constructive input, as opposed to simply repeating what he's already said? He KNOWS the source code is available. HE SAYS SO. He also said he doesn't care to discuss the matter of installing rev10. He simply asked for information on compiling it with rev9. If you don't want to offer any information relating to his query, why not just remain silent instead of offering your "fuck off...if you want rev9 go fucking do it yourself" attitude?fishears said:Bawal said:...just a short question:
Is there a significant reason why this (really cool & fast!) USBLoader will result in DSI-Dump when
using cIOS249 rev9? I know it needs rev10...but why? I would like to skip rev10 (please no discussion about
their revisions!)...I'm able to compile your source code by myself...is somebody able to give me a hint whether it's possible
with rev9 and which part of the source code needs special attention?
No big deal if not...hope official rev11 will come soon... keep going!
Why don't you just install rev 10 like we ask? I don't understand your objection. If you want it to run with rev 9 well, the source is there for you. Good luck.