Hey guys! I got another idea! Why were at it why dont we just take away the 3D and the touchscreen and the motion controls and those anonning X and Y buttons and the d-pad! Even better lets get rid of the name nintendo it sounds like a japanease condom, Also marios a fat ass so lets take him out also, OH whats this? GAMES?! AHAHAHA YOU WANT GAMES ON YOUR GAME CONSOLE THATS JUST STUPID!!
But on a more serious note, Why would you add a another O-pad? I mean its impractical when you have a touch screen AND motion controls. Im a lefty and I have not issues with the touch screen for aiming all you do is USE YOUR THUMB. Besides, Its not like nintendo would re release it anyway :/. Plus, if you seriously think 3rd partys will even THINK about the touch screen if they
HAD a duel stick?
yes they will, it has way more uses then just as a second stick. The PSV has both of those and it makes use of them....so yes...
OH YEAH! How could I forget that Zanfire would have a PSV 3 Months early AND already have games!
The sad part about the 10 different control inputs is that they are most likely there so that the system looks as universal as a iPod Touch, I doubt the touch screen will be used for anything other then selecting icons and such and the dual sticks will pretty much be the only thing you see for actual gameplay but thats just me, I havent had much faith in sony since the PS3 came out.
ANYWAY, I think you misunderstood what I ment. When I said "not touch" I ment that the touch screen would be reduced to mini games and selection but nothing that would be VITAL to gameplay.
so instead of re-wording yourself, lets insult a fully valid statement (which btw if you watch any gameplay of some of the PSV games you would know what i meant) but hey, better to be an ass right?
Making the touch screen into a second analog...how is that suddenly making it not "vital"....hell why would you want it to be? whats wrong with them making different uses out of it giving us MORE control? Making the touch screen into a second stick takes away all the other things it could also do. To me it sound like and enhancement, not a detriment.
XD I just saw the mistake I made, I guess thats what I get for posting on an iPod.
The reason why I think the touch screen should be more "vital" to gameplay is for the EXACT REASON YOU SAID. More control. Not all of us play the same way so whats wrong with the screen being used as a second stick? I mean its ALREADY THERE.
Do you want a bulky controller add-on so you can use a second stick? Do you want a shit load of early and price cut adopters to feel cheated? Do you want games that only use that second stick till the touch screen is reduced to nothing but a quick menu or a map screen? The most painful thing about this is that a 2nd stick would only have real worth in a FPS, Anything else the touch screen or L&R buttons are clearly more practical.
God forbid, Having an opinion that someone over the INTERNET doesnt like makes me an "Ass"
kthnxshwn said:
Zantigo said:
kthnxshwn said:
QUOTE(Zantigo @ Sep 9 2011, 06:51 PM)
QUOTE(kthnxshwn @ Sep 9 2011, 11:44 PM)
Which Japanese condom brand sounds like Nintendo?
Someone doesnt understand obvious sarcasm