GBAtemp Game of the Year 2017 Voting: PlayStation
No, it says 1999.Sonic Adventure was a launch title for the Dreamcast, but it launched in 1998 in Japan. It released in the US in 1999, yet it's still counted as a 1999 release
Japanese version landed in '98No, it says 1999.
From wikipedia
The North American version of the game was released on September 9, 1999, and it was released in Europe on September 23, 1999.
I don't see it say 98.
Yes, I know. But look at the word. It says version.Japanese version landed in '98
lol
are you from earth? why do you try so hard to not understand? are you not to the point where you can understand things beyond face value?The Last Story (Wii)
Game of the Year 20XX (TBD for USA release)
Dude he's just messing with you.are you from earth? why do you try so hard to not understand? are you not to the point where you can understand things beyond face value.
you give them too much credit. some people really are this pitiable.Dude he's just messing with you.
Dude he's just messing with you.
Can you show me another picture and make the text bigger.just because an above par game gets snubbed doesnt mean you can tac it on the year after. Its why movies release at the end of the year so no other movie can top it.
P5 is 2016 game, it got WHOOPED by overwatch
Sonic is 1998, it got STOMPED by Zelda
p5 as a 2017 game is 'ludicris' AND it got SYOMP, SPIT ON and butt wiped by Zelda
Don't feed the trolls. We're evaluating the Western release because we're westerners.Can you show me another picture and make the text bigger.
I need more pictures.
That was a joke comment.Don't feed the trolls. We're evaluating the Western release because we're westerners.
As stated earlier, Crash bandicoot N. Sane trilogy was a REMAKE (not remaster) of the entire trilogy from the ground up. I encourage you to go look into the development of the n. Sane trilogy sometime, as it'll probably help you understand why it's in this vote. Not only did it include all three of the original games, but it also added time trials, an extra playable character, and even an extra level that wasn't directly accessible in the original crash bandicoot (it was accessible through hacking however).Crash Bandicoot N. Sane Trilogy... shouldn't be there either
As stated earlier, Crash bandicoot N. Sane trilogy was a REMAKE (not remaster) of the entire trilogy from the ground up. I encourage you to go look into the development of the n. Sane trilogy sometime, as it'll probably help you understand why it's in this vote. Not only did it include all three of the original games, but it also added time trials, an extra playable character, and even an extra level that wasn't directly accessible in the original crash bandicoot (it was accessible through hacking however).
Lol, the remake is definitely not the same as the original. The remake was not only built from the ground up with new assets, but added extra content. And it also seems like the people are in disagreement with you. Here's a poll from gamefaqs with 70% of people saying it's a remake:Crash was NOT a 'remake' its the exact same game as the first one they just had to rebuild it from the ground up because they lost all assets, but going by that logic why isn't Wind Waker HD not the 2013 GOTY if they had to do the same thing and build it from the ground up? Or Twilight Princess?
Lol, the remake is definitely not the same as the original. The remake was not only built from the ground up with new assets, but added extra content. And it also seems like the people are in disagreement with you. Here's a poll from gamefaqs with 70% of people saying it's a remake:
https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/191634-crash-bandicoot-n-sane-trilogy/75513823
Since you don't seem to know, Here's the difference between a remake vs a remaster:
https://gaming.stackexchange.com/qu...nce-and-meaning-between-remastered-and-remake
There's no point in arguing with you. Even after I give you a definition, you still disagree and say "noes it's not a remake cuz the gameplay wasn't changedz". Remakes don't have to have a major gameplay change, as seen in the definition I gave you. As long as the game is built from the ground up with brand new code and new assets it's technically a remake. And also the gameplay is actually slightly different in the remake when compared to the original crash games due to having different in game physics when, for example, crash is jumping.A remake is Tomb Raider 2013 a fresh start and totally new game, they didnt just rebuild the original and add an extra tit because that doesn't make it a new game.
Windwaker HD added a new sail, new controls and built it from the ground up. Does that qualify it for Game of The Year? I'm gonna assume the switch will change it up when it arrives too, does that qualify it as a 'remake'?
There's no point in arguing with you. Even after I give you a definition, you still disagree and say "noes it's not a remake cuz the gameplay wasn't changedz". Remakes don't have to have a major gameplay change, as seen in the definition I gave you. As long as the game is built from the ground up with brand new code and new assets it's technically a remake. And also the gameplay is actually slightly different in the remake when compared to the original crash games due to having different in game physics when, for example, crash is jumping.