Hacking Emulation RetroArch/Libretro Thread: PS Vita Edition! Nightlies Included

rsn8887

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2015
Messages
956
Trophies
1
Age
47
Website
www.patreon.com
XP
3,642
Country
United States
Well Retroarch has never been very stable, but yes now with 1.6.7 on Vita it became completely unusable. It crashes to reboot all the time for me when loading cores, or gives errors on loading content... glad to see it is not just me. Is anyone testing these things before releasing new "stable' builds?

EDIT: I reverted back to 1.6.4 and the Mame 2003 core loads without crashing, but loading Atari Lynx (Handy) content still crashes the emulator. I know it worked in an older version, but which one (sigh).
 
Last edited by rsn8887,

Cha0tic

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2013
Messages
733
Trophies
1
Age
30
XP
1,898
Country
United States
In the last few months how has the progress been? Haven't used this in a few months and curious on how the snes, GBA and psx cores are doing now.
 

rsn8887

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2015
Messages
956
Trophies
1
Age
47
Website
www.patreon.com
XP
3,642
Country
United States
In the last few months how has the progress been? Haven't used this in a few months and curious on how the snes, GBA and psx cores are doing now.

EDIT: Never mind, I thought it was bad but it is very good. I made a mistake and copied way too many Bios files ( hundreds of files ) into the system dir. Somehow that made Retroarch very unstable. I just tested it again after keeping only the bios files I really needed, and now the latest nightly it works great! Sorry for the confusion in my earlier posts.
 
Last edited by rsn8887,

Muxi

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2016
Messages
606
Trophies
0
Age
52
XP
2,142
Country
Germany
Does psxrearmed in version 1.6.4 has the best performance, or is threre a better version that I should use ?
 

Lord M

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2014
Messages
1,075
Trophies
0
Age
31
XP
502
Country
Italy
Does psxrearmed in version 1.6.4 has the best performance, or is threre a better version that I should use ?
I used last nightly and works very well. And yes, i noticed slightly improvement since version before 1.6.4 (for example, i noticed less slowdown and frame drop after a load state in Crash 2)
 

Kerbangman

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2016
Messages
525
Trophies
0
Age
62
XP
700
Country
EDIT: Never mind, I thought it was bad but it is very good. I made a mistake and copied way too many Bios files ( hundreds of files ) into the system dir. Somehow that made Retroarch very unstable. I just tested it again after keeping only the bios files I really needed, and now the latest nightly it works great! Sorry for the confusion in my earlier posts.

Could you list what the bios names are. Thanks
 

rsn8887

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2015
Messages
956
Trophies
1
Age
47
Website
www.patreon.com
XP
3,642
Country
United States
Could you list what the bios names are. Thanks

Well I deleted all of them apart from three SCPH playstation files and the mame2003/samples and fba/samples files. Having too many subdirs and files in system/mame2003 caused that core to crash on load.

Having lynxboot.img present caused all lynx games to crash into black screen on load.
 

rsn8887

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2015
Messages
956
Trophies
1
Age
47
Website
www.patreon.com
XP
3,642
Country
United States
Which core is it? I am sorry but I did not try every core. Some might still crash. I would like to try the one you have problems with, too.

BTW: You can always go back and re-install the 1.6.4 "stable" over your current install, if you want to try that one.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    SylverReZ @ SylverReZ: @Xdqwerty, No idea, Wish.com is dead.