I will record it. Its 100% coldboot I have the coldboot fw.img on my sd card. I didn't use this way I used the old download the system.xml a while ago way, that might be why.That means your not using IOSUHAX. You are using simple sig patcher.
I will record it. Its 100% coldboot I have the coldboot fw.img on my sd card. I didn't use this way I used the old download the system.xml a while ago way, that might be why.That means your not using IOSUHAX. You are using simple sig patcher.
That means your not using IOSUHAX. You are using simple sig patcher.
I'm not making excuses my camera is flat I have it on charge now I will record it asap and get it up.That means your not using IOSUHAX. You are using simple sig patcher.
as you can see it is about 1 minute and since coldboothax is basically on par with this I am not touching it until it beats this
I have haxchi 1.8+ a custom theme + dimoks latest iosuhax what is setup incorrectly?I'm not making excuses my camera is flat I have it on charge now I will record it asap and get it up.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Its not set up correctly buddy, really, you need to go and start again
but but I just showed you it doesn't..... less than minute even@Reecey If all our setups are "wrong" then upload your haxchi config and how your file is setup. It takes 2 minutes for it to boot sysnand. That is how it has always been
Nobody cares about your "Quickboothax"but but I just showed you it doesn't..... less than minute even
I have haxchi 1.8+ a custom theme + dimoks latest iosuhax what is setup incorrectly?
oh I thought he was debating about quick start haxchi since quick start is completely non functional with coldboothaxNobody cares about your "Quickboothax"
They were referring to coldboothax.oh I thought he was debating about quick start haxchi since quick start is completely non functional with coldboothax
Nobody cares about your "Quickboothax"
simple sig patcher is great but if you do anything that reloads firm you have to manually start it again eg. system settings + ftpiiu_everywhere thosen't work without itGuys, why are you booting to IOSUHAX anyway? What's the need? Why not boot directly to simple sig patcher? Much faster, way less than one min. I mean, unless you NEED wupserver for something, then you can just boot to another img holding down a key in haxchi.
I don't bother using IOSUHAX anymore unless I need to connect via wup.
I understand that some people are scared of everything. What I'm saying is coldboothax is crap. So is "quickboothax"He was making the point that it boots just about as fast as coldboothax so he doesn't want to mess with the system.xml until there is a significant speed advantage with coldboothax. Nobody cares about your non constructive post.
it thosen't take 2 minutes to load though also its not a hax I just made that cringy title to try to get people stop using coldboothax. both are shite compared to a boot0/1 exploit but none have been found to date so its all we got atmI understand that some people are scared of everything. What I'm saying is coldboothax is crap. So is "quickboothax"
simple sig patcher is great but if you do anything that reloads firm you have to manually start it again eg. system settings + ftpiiu_everywhere thosen't work without it
Guys, why are you booting to IOSUHAX anyway? What's the need? Why not boot directly to simple sig patcher? Much faster, way less than one min. I mean, unless you NEED wupserver for something, then you can just boot to another img holding down a key in haxchi.
I don't bother using IOSUHAX anymore unless I need to connect via wup.
I know it isn't a hax. However your even admitting that your using clickbait tactics to stop people from doing what they want. Nobody will give a shit about and will use it anyways.it thosen't take 2 minutes to load though also its not a hax I just made that cringy title to try to get people stop using coldboothax. both are shite compared to a boot0/1 exploit but none have been found to date so its all we got atm
yeah once simple sig patcher with ftpiiu_everywhere support comes out I will more than likely switch to it, also I forgot to mention with the latest edition of dimok's fork you can load any game from any region now without doing regionhax, I just feel uncomfortable messing with critical system files without a recovery method so I haven't used it yet but now I don't have toOK. I get that, guess I don't use ftpii that much anyways
Also there is the "not so simple" sign patcher otherwise not known as paxchi/chaxchi or any other host of non names (just a joke, a name has yet to be decided). I didn't try that one myself yet, but apparently it also has wupserver built in and loads fastish. Happy compromise? I don't know about you guys but I don't go in and out of sys settings much. And now the WiiU is all setup, no need for wup or ftpii (for now ).
Last I checked coldbooting simple sig patcher results in it loading the system menu twice just like booting the coldboot-cfw. Also I'm pretty sure that sig patcher has WUPserver functionality now. I don't use sig patcher because I see no reason to switch now that I've already compiled cfw and setup coldboothax. Sure, I don't have to have a fw.img on my SD card, but I still need the sig patcher's .elf file so I see no need to switch. Also, I know cfw meets my needs 100%. There were some incompatibilities with sig patcher (maybe fixed by now).