USB Cable Charging Speed Question

Wildblood

Well-Known Member
OP
Newcomer
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
77
Trophies
0
XP
182
Country
Greece
Hi all,

I recently lost my phone's USB cable. When I used a different third party cable I noticed that the charging time dramatically increased (from 3 hours to 8+ hours, despite using the same wall adapter). This leads me to think that USB cable quality and/or specifications dramatically affect the charging speed of devices.

After exhaustive google searches I haven't been able to understand how this all works, or what kind of cable I should be looking to buy (apart from one site which said I should get a 28/24 cable...whatever that is).

Does anyone here know?
 

Pedeadstrian

GBAtemp's Official frill-necked lizard.
Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2012
Messages
3,966
Trophies
2
Location
Sandy Eggo
XP
3,893
Country
United States
Hi all,

I recently lost my phone's USB cable. When I used a different third party cable I noticed that the charging time dramatically increased (from 3 hours to 8+ hours, despite using the same wall adapter). This leads me to think that USB cable quality and/or specifications dramatically affect the charging speed of devices.

After exhaustive google searches I haven't been able to understand how this all works, or what kind of cable I should be looking to buy (apart from one site which said I should get a 28/24 cable...whatever that is).

Does anyone here know?
The 28/24 part is the gauge (or size) of the wire itself. The amperage is what you wanna look for in cables. I'd try going to Amazon and finding the best-reviewed cables. I assume your phone is somewhat recent, and therefore is easy to find a cable for.
 

FAST6191

Techromancer
Editorial Team
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
36,798
Trophies
3
XP
28,346
Country
United Kingdom
Did your old cable just do charging or did it also function as a USB cable?

If it just charged then quite often it will have a component to indicate that it is a fast charge cable. The iphone is a good example here -- USB2.0 has four wires, the iphone will tie the data lines together with a certain resistance (that the phone then measures) and act as a normal USB or a fast charge (at double the Amps, and about half the time as a result).

It could have also been a data cable and had active components to tell the phone/charger what is up but usually it is just a passive one. You did not mention make or model though so we can not go further.
 

Wildblood

Well-Known Member
OP
Newcomer
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
77
Trophies
0
XP
182
Country
Greece
Did your old cable just do charging or did it also function as a USB cable?

If it just charged then quite often it will have a component to indicate that it is a fast charge cable. The iphone is a good example here -- USB2.0 has four wires, the iphone will tie the data lines together with a certain resistance (that the phone then measures) and act as a normal USB or a fast charge (at double the Amps, and about half the time as a result).

It could have also been a data cable and had active components to tell the phone/charger what is up but usually it is just a passive one. You did not mention make or model though so we can not go further.

Thanks for your replies. The cable was some no-name one, so I couldn't tell you who made it - some dude in China I guess. The phone is a Sony Xperia Z2 if that helps. The stock cable and wall-charger could pump out 1.5A (if I understood correctly). Going by the slow charge time of the other cable, I'd guess it let <500mA through (using the same wall-charger).
 

FAST6191

Techromancer
Editorial Team
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
36,798
Trophies
3
XP
28,346
Country
United Kingdom
Doing some reading and it looks like it is simpler than others I have seen. Apparently on the phone end* the data wires are shorted (green and white if you have a standard coloured cable, this can vary with the cheap cables I have seen in the past) and that tells the phone it can draw the the current it can, it might vary for some models but that is for qualcomm and they seem to be the supplier for the bigger plays (samsung, sony...).

*leave the charger/PC end dangling, though if you want to tape each end up to avoid shorting on the other or the shielding them too then that is good.
 

Wildblood

Well-Known Member
OP
Newcomer
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
77
Trophies
0
XP
182
Country
Greece
Doing some reading and it looks like it is simpler than others I have seen. Apparently on the phone end* the data wires are shorted (green and white if you have a standard coloured cable, this can vary with the cheap cables I have seen in the past) and that tells the phone it can draw the the current it can, it might vary for some models but that is for qualcomm and they seem to be the supplier for the bigger plays (samsung, sony...).

*leave the charger/PC end dangling, though if you want to tape each end up to avoid shorting on the other or the shielding them too then that is good.

Ah sorry, I did read your post before properly. My old cable was supplied with my phone, so it was a Sony one I assume. It did charging and transferred data (though it would charge slower from my PC's USB 3.0 port, than it would when it was plugged directly into the wall adapter). The no-name cable was the one that slow-charged.

I didn't quite understand what your last post implied - are you saying my no-name cable has a couple of busted wires internally?
 

FAST6191

Techromancer
Editorial Team
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
36,798
Trophies
3
XP
28,346
Country
United Kingdom
I saw the suggested diagram for the qualcomm/sony stuff and did some further reading, you could probably make it transfer as well as charge (though maybe not at the same time) but if we have to make a cheap cable into a fastcharge you might have to sacrifice data capability.

The no name cable is probably fine (if it charges and can also do data then it is fine), the post was saying what mods could be done to make it possibly charge a bit faster. It might not end up like the original one (cheap cables can still use cheap wire and get limited that way) but it should still be enough to notice.
 

Wildblood

Well-Known Member
OP
Newcomer
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
77
Trophies
0
XP
182
Country
Greece
I saw the suggested diagram for the qualcomm/sony stuff and did some further reading, you could probably make it transfer as well as charge (though maybe not at the same time) but if we have to make a cheap cable into a fastcharge you might have to sacrifice data capability.

The no name cable is probably fine (if it charges and can also do data then it is fine), the post was saying what mods could be done to make it possibly charge a bit faster. It might not end up like the original one (cheap cables can still use cheap wire and get limited that way) but it should still be enough to notice.

I'm willing to buy a proper cable so I can carry it around and use it for any purpose (and if it's able to be used for MHL 3, for sending video to compatible TVs, even better), but I'm having a hard time identifying which cables are good and which aren't. They mention if they're USB 2.0 or 3.0, but nothing about low/full/hi-speed, and nothing about power capacity. I'll call up companies individually to ask for the cable I need, but I need to educate myself on what specifications I need to be asking for...and I can't seem to find a clear answer for that.

The safe alternative is to buy a cable directly from Sony...but ouch (the price).
 

Joe88

[λ]
Global Moderator
Joined
Jan 6, 2008
Messages
12,736
Trophies
2
Age
36
XP
7,424
Country
United States
Many off brand cables I found will only provide 0.5A or less (average seems to be around 0.3A) compared to the official cables which provide 1-2A when I tested them with a multimeter
 

Wildblood

Well-Known Member
OP
Newcomer
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
77
Trophies
0
XP
182
Country
Greece
Many thanks for the feedback. I wish they provided the specs on the packaging, but I guess that's too much to ask for. I'll buy a brand cable and hope for the best :angry:
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    Ninty can still make money filing false DMCAs.
    +1
  • realtimesave @ realtimesave:
    they need to have a strong line up on the launch titles too. I think they should move metroid prime 4 to the next console because by now it has been quite a while and there's no release date scheduled yet
  • realtimesave @ realtimesave:
    lol there's a guy selling mig switch in usa on ebay for $200/ea he's definitely going to get nailed with dmca by tomorrow
  • ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21:
    Wasn't Metroid Prime 4 teased all the way back in 2017? For the switch no less?
    :rofl2:
  • ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21:
    Pretty sure anyone buying the switch just for that got duped
  • realtimesave @ realtimesave:
    for $200? rofl.
  • realtimesave @ realtimesave:
    well as far as metroid prime 4 is concerned, the next system probably is similar enough to the current gen they can probably easily just slap it onto a next gen cart and call it good :P
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    The switch was about 350 in 2017
  • Metoroid0 @ Metoroid0:
    mabe where you live
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Nintendo president Tatsumi Kimishima took the stage at the outset to reveal that Switch will launch globally on March 3, 2017 for $299.99—earlier than some had expected at the price many suspected. https://time.com/4632820/nintendo-switch-nx/
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    The NES launched at like 250 and the rob and light gun kit was like 350 or something
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    I was near the test market for the NES and man did it make my 2600 look like ass lol
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    There has to be some mutual agreement with them all anything over $600 is just pc territory
  • realtimesave @ realtimesave:
    next system rumored to launch at $400
  • realtimesave @ realtimesave:
    but I don't really believe any rumors yet
  • realtimesave @ realtimesave:
    need to have official info from N
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    The 3DO and Neo Geo where like 700 bucks hmm the PS3 was stupid expensive at launch lol
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    But at least the PS3 was only 500 for the cheapest one at launch
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    My opinion is that 199.99 is the sweet spot but that spot is long gone lol
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Just played some Micheal Jackson Moonwalker.... Those poor parents trying desperately to protect their children
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    400 is a decent sweet spot if we get enough out of it
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    It's not like how it was when we were locked down to a few options and that's it
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    For me just buying a Pi and some accessories fills that not a PC void new consoles have just put them close to PC prices and all the patching and updates makes me feel like I might as well just get a PC
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Were talking new Gen consoles at launch here
    K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2: Were talking new Gen consoles at launch here