Is that an insult?
Because I wrote two science fiction novels, I study literature as part of my university studies and "creativity" is really quite a strong point of mine. If you're referring to my views on the world, they are what they are because they're based on both my objective and subjective experiences concerning the world - many of the phenomena I mentioned can be re-created easily, which is why I can validate them as true. Alternatively, I can look at some figure of authority who will do it for me so that I can judge the result. My "creative" side is very much involved, it's just involved with direction.
Now, what I'm saying is that the fact you don't understand something doesn't mean it's magic and the fact that you subjectively think about something doesn't mean it's true - subjectively, the sun orbits the Earth, in reality, it's the other way around. Strong reliance on subjectivity alone pushes you away from the truth rather than closer to it.
Wrong again my friend. Sun and the planets move in a D.N.A sequence. My subjective info was collected from "out of the box", suppressed info. My blog has all the research work. I combined it all. It's not flawed because i think quantum, not basic. You can't even explain paranormal phenomenon.