Hacking Discussion Team Xecuter Switch SX

  • Thread starter Thread starter gooseberry101
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 249,084
  • Replies Replies 1,316
  • Likes Likes 39
Almost no end user can "see" what the code does, even if it is open source.
Also, the closed source product is not necessarily more dangerous.
Having the code being open let's you analyse it and check for unfair play and bugs. But for this you also need knowledge and time, or a committee that you trust to check and approve the open code, I don't think you will be getting a trustable open committee to check the CFW code any time soon.
No, an experienced person can build the opensource code themselves that they have checked that no naughty bits are in. I'm not saying everyone can do it, but it's hell of a lot easier for an coder etc. to review it and say Yay or Nay!
I'm not saying TX will brick consoles, I hardly doubt it. It's TX after all.
 
Jakkal:

Nintendo already appears quite intent on verifying legitimacy of a console, by using collected telemetry data on application use, which gets sent to nintendo.
Unless the TX CFW completely disables connecting to nintendo servers in every way, the data the CFW sends (OR DOES NOT SEND!) can be quite telling.

Consistent behaviors that are not the expected behaviors is a tell-tale indicator that the system is not running on the software that they provided. They can cite this as the evidence they need to ban your console.

How do you think nintendo WONT detect the TX CFW?
If I stay offline with the CFW the whole time and if I wanna play online (Pokemon/Smash/MHGU/etc) I boot into the stock firmware, could Nintendo still detect the CFW? I buy all my games retail anyway, so that should work and not get me banned, right?
 
first of all
i give zero shits about nintendos online
sencond, youre the who made a baseless claim about cfw danger levels

And you are not alone; However, you are not represenative of 100% of users of CFW, nor of pirates.
Being able to look at sysnand, and the recorded telemetry there-- and the emunand, and the telemetry there-- and do a simple XOR between the two, and to send valid telemetry, without the CFW telemetry, would make atmosphere be able to talk to ninty servers without being detected.
 
If I stay offline with the CFW the whole time and if I wanna play online (Pokemon/Smash/MHGU/etc) I boot into the stock firmware, could Nintendo still detect the CFW? I buy all my games retail anyway, so that should work and not get me banned, right?

Yes, if the TX CFW does not do emunand. See the warnings about using Hekate.
 
I never understood the concept of a lost sale. A transaction that hasn't been made cannot be accounted for as lost revenue. In the world of goods that's a loss in inventory, in the world of software there is no inventory, a new copy just magically comes into existence, how do you quantify that as a loss? If anything, we should punish distributors of illegitimate copies, not the people who download them - if it's free and out there, it's free and out there, I'm sorry that your DRM failed, but that's life. You're right, it's not going away, but most people grow out of it. Nowadays I buy all of my games even though I'm still fully capable of pirating them just because I want them on my shelf and I want to support the devs, but not everyone has that kind of disposable income. In fact, I'd argue that many times games become big *because* they get pirated and, as such, distributed to a larger target than would be possible otherwise. Those pirates become customers if your product is good, I'm a prime example.


That’s just what I was saying. A pirated game isn’t a lost sale. If they never had intentions to buy the thing in the first place, you’re losing nothing.

I personally don’t care about piracy, it’s not as if we can really do anything about it.

Sure you could shut down whoever is hosting illegally obtained software. But it’ll just show up elsewhere.

So at the end of the day, ignore it. The big companies will try and find ways to stop it, but that’ll likely be circumvented too.

It’s an endless loop that’s been going on since, well for me, the days when we could borrow a friends cassete and copy it in a dual deck cassette recorder :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Foxi4
Do you need to go through the same process every time you power off your Switch?

Unknown. We dont have the TX CFW to analyze.

We DO know that 4.1.0 and lower are vulnerable to Deja-Vu, and thus could potentially be soft-modded.
However, a seling point of the TX product is "Any firmware."

It is possible that the TX product performs soft modding where possible, and provides the dongle for every other case. It is impossible to know until a person has the product in their hands, and analyzes it.
 
For people who actually want to buy this "modchip", remember:
You are purchasing a device which is used to gain unauthorised access into a console. Do you really want this to be closed source?
I legit don't give a f*ck about it.
Why would I trust SciresM and his crew more than them? Why would I trust Xecuter more than SciresM?

And by the way, even an open-source project can f*ck you up. Being able to read it doesn't mean being able to understand it.
The only reason why people don't reveal their sources these days is copycats.

Envoyé de mon MI 5s Plus en utilisant Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: jakkal

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum