wyndcrosser said:I want to throw my two cents in here.
The information on wikileaks isn't even 100% or even 5% correct, or even valuable intelligence. I was a (erased) for 6yrs, both on the infantry and on higher echelons. Intelligence reports and such documents are those written up by CI specialist (Counter Intel), these reports are from local sources, etc. The sources are not always reliable or even 1% accurate and even we in the field take those individuals with a grain of salt. The fact that these got released as well as SIGACT dairies, is nothing big if you understand the material and what goes into it.
QUOTE said:I assume that, within the coming week.. we will have a finger on who actually launched stuxnet. my guess would probably be that, it was coded by the bush admin, and given to israel shortly before B.O. gained power, That way they knew it would be used if it need to be.
People like you are what cause topics like this to blow up past one page, if you don't understand the world you live in, please don't attempt to document it to the world, and prove to others you are clueless.
It's not funny.
Wynd
Midna said:But what dirty secrets does Nintendo have, eh?
shakirmoledina said:remember this is all info from US... we cant say everything is 100% correct
most of it doesnt have proof
In a thread about an anti-censorship website, why would it be a good idea to censor the R-word?MEGAMANTROTSKY said:in fabricated [censored] charges against Assange in Sweden?
Are you implying that I used it flippantly?Vulpes Abnocto said:Our policy on that word might change eventually, when people learn not to use it so flippantly.
MEGAMANTROTSKY said:Are you implying that I used it flippantly?Vulpes Abnocto said:Our policy on that word might change eventually, when people learn not to use it so flippantly.
Vulpes Abnocto said:Are you implying this censoring of the word was put in place due to you?
Of course I'm not referring to you.
wyndcrosser said:I want to throw my two cents in here.
The information on wikileaks isn't even 100% or even 5% correct, or even valuable intelligence. I was a (erased) for 6yrs, both on the infantry and on higher echelons. Intelligence reports and such documents are those written up by CI specialist (Counter Intel), these reports are from local sources, etc. The sources are not always reliable or even 1% accurate and even we in the field take those individuals with a grain of salt. The fact that these got released as well as SIGACT dairies, is nothing big if you understand the material and what goes into it.
QUOTE said:I assume that, within the coming week.. we will have a finger on who actually launched stuxnet. my guess would probably be that, it was coded by the bush admin, and given to israel shortly before B.O. gained power, That way they knew it would be used if it need to be.
People like you are what cause topics like this to blow up past one page, if you don't understand the world you live in, please don't attempt to document it to the world, and prove to others you are clueless.
It's not funny.
Wynd