The decline you are implying never really occurred. Graphical interfaces came before web browsers and thus the first web browsers were graphical. Text-based web browsers have actually (practically) never really been used by anybody.tj_cool said:I believe the second question means: "What one is the fastest from the ones you use?"
Possibly, although that's not really implied. Also, with "other" still in the mix, it's not a question just about which of the four named ones is the fastest.
And that (practically) nobody uses anymore.HBK said:As for extensions, Chrome nearly has them all
Source? Still missing around 3000 (including several of the plugins atleast I use in FF), last time I checked. ~75% isn't really particularly near.
It is however true that extensions are not nearly as big a problem as it was previously, and that Chrome soon will have more than Firefox at this rate.
QUOTE(HBK @ Jan 25 2011, 07:09 PM)
Which doesn't actually change the fact that it is ridiculously easy to understand that they are generally a lot faster. A basket with a few apples simple weighs less than one with many (unless the fewer apples are as bloated as a bloated application), regardless of which basket has the shinier apples.
And text-based browsers are just the most clear example. Any of the plethora of lightweight browsers that don't offer anything besides a URL field and maybe tabs (everyone and their mother seems to have made such a browser if you look around, and there are relatively popular ones) will be faster than any of the feature-rich popular web browsers unless they are extremely poorly coded.