Just for clarification, because reading this topic made me question if I got the right interpretation from the blog post:
Someone was able to hack and/or get info from the PSN, Sony was able to identify that action, and took down the whole system to prevent further invasions. Am I correct?
It says so on the Blog, that they took the system offline to prevent any more invasions and upgrade their entire defense system against that kind of thing. But everyone on this topic (and also some of the other source stated on the first post) is talking about how this is Anonymous' fault.
But Sony took it down by themselves. And said so on the Blog (it's also the first part in bold if you check the first post). How are you even connecting Anonymous to the downtime..? Or is it just baseless assumptions because that other source cited Anonymous?
Someone was able to hack and/or get info from the PSN, Sony was able to identify that action, and took down the whole system to prevent further invasions. Am I correct?
It says so on the Blog, that they took the system offline to prevent any more invasions and upgrade their entire defense system against that kind of thing. But everyone on this topic (and also some of the other source stated on the first post) is talking about how this is Anonymous' fault.
But Sony took it down by themselves. And said so on the Blog (it's also the first part in bold if you check the first post). How are you even connecting Anonymous to the downtime..? Or is it just baseless assumptions because that other source cited Anonymous?