This is a very nifty feature that is... entirely pointless. Whoever has a PS3, already has a nice TV set to go with it. Whoever will buy the PS Vita, will buy it with an intent to use it as a portable gaming system, not a controller. Whoever buys $300-$400 controllers sh*ts money. I see it as a gimmick. A fun gimmick, but a gimmick none the less. Remember, "what does everything does everything mediocre" - they shouldn't be jamming features into the Vita too hard.
If it's useless on the PS3 + Vita, it's useless on the Wii U.
Also, Vita isn't a controller only. It's still a handheld and you can use it everywhere you wants to use.
I don't get this. How can this
gimmick sidefeature from the PSV determine wether or not the Wii U's
main-focus will be useless?
Just FYI, the Wii U will most likely be priced at the same price or less of a PSV (they won't repeat the 3DS pricing-mistake again I'm sure) and
every game will see features developed around this tablet. While buying a PSV+PS3 will go over double the price the Wii U will be and will probably just feature 10 games at most.
You just make no sense.
TheDarkSeed said:
This is a feature I was hoping the 3DS would have. I think it's a nice feature.
Although there may still be some hope for my wish.
Actually, the 3DS will be able to be used as a Wii U controller Iwata said (too lasy to look it up though, but it's there).
yabhero said:
Urza said:
QUOTE(prowler_ @ Aug 2 2011, 10:54 AM) QUOTE(gameandmatch @ Aug 2 2011, 05:51 PM)
3. Nintendo never had a threat when it comes to having the most sales for it's game systems.
PS2 sir.
Not saying that it's is and ever has been a 'threat', just ruling Nintendo out of the best sales column.
In addition, the original PlayStation sold three times as many units as the N64.
Current gen the Wii is being outsold by both the PS3 and 360 in the US.