Gaming Pokemon R/B/Y VC Trading & Multiplayer Battle!

[Plstic]

Kinda like you have no braincells http://zeldawiki.org/The_Legend_of_Zelda:_Four_Swords_Anniversary_Edition

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------



http://zeldawiki.org/The_Legend_of_Zelda:_Four_Swords_Anniversary_Edition

GBA VC games act exactly like a GBA its a glorified emulator so it does not have other device access, Running it as a DSIWARE gives it the system access it needs


While using multiplayer mode, the game now uses local wireless rather than link cables. The game does not support online co-op.

That game is a port dude.

 

[Kioku]

4Swords is a GBA GAME, IT IS MULTPLAYER ONLY VIA LINK CABLE

They Re-released it during the 25th Anniversary as a DSIWARE and multiple times after on the 3ds ESHOP
its new defining feature is

While using multiplayer mode, the game now uses local wireless rather than link cables. The game does not support online co-op.


Hmmm Can one of you see the magical picture please or at least do some research on how this works

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------


DSiWare remake and port of the Game Boy Advance
the remake changing the title screen and sounds etc

Yeah and the 3DS GBA VC cannot access the 3DS Functions, thats why im stating Pokemon is DSIWARE so it can access them

People Plz

I feel like you're trolling... The four swords was originally released on the DSi as DSiWare... It's not a GBA rom running on a DSiWare emulator.. It was rebuilt...

VC is COMPLETELY different. It's built for 3ds hardware.. So it DOES IN FACT HAVE ACCESS TO WIRELESS FUNCTIONS.

 

[izy]

This @squee666 kid is an idiot.

okay then matey you come in say and insult and have had no contribution or real opinion at al in this thread, go fish someo where else

 

[Olmectron]

This @squee666 kid is an idiot.

He just said NES games in 3DS Virtual Console are DSiWare. I support your comment.

 

[izy]

He just said NES games in 3DS Virtual Console are DSiWare. I support your comment.

dunno where i mentioned that please quote me on it
because this entire thread has only mentioned GBA an GB games

 

[izy]

First of all, the game is not a DSiWare.
Four Swords Anniversary Edition is a DSiWare, because it is a remake of the game. The R/B/Y Pokemon games are not DSiWare, they are 3DS VC.
Why? Because they are emulating slightly changed roms of the game that patch a few bugs.

Wanna hear all the changes in the Four Swords remake

• Some of the original GBA sound effects have been enhanced into better quality. The soundtrack has also been given a few instrumental enhances.
• The game now has its own file select screen, instead of a shared one as in A Link to the Past & Four Swords. Link can now also be named.
• In reflection of the new stages added, the map screen has been slightly updated.

You wanna know why these are changed because four swords was a bundled game with LTTP.
its only stated a remake because of those few changes its still a full port

 

[Kioku]

dunno where i mentioned that please quote me on it
because this entire thread has only mentioned GBA an GB games

... And for the LOVE OF GOD! QUIT TALKING ABOUT GBA VC. It isn't even relevant...

 

[Shubshub]

Also with your statements, You realize we are talking about the 3DS System?
If anything was to be true with what you said Why wouldn't they just make it a 3DSWare? Your arguments are completely invalid

 

[Kioku]

Wanna hear all the changes in the Four Swords remake



You wanna know why these are changed because four swords was a bundled game with LTTP.
its only stated a remake because of those few changes its still a full port

Holy shit.. You are dense.. It's NOT a "port".. It was remade via the code they had for the GBA version to WORK AND TAKE ADVANTAGE of the things like the wireless functions. It isn't even relevant anyway. Why are you still going on about it?

 

[izy]

Also with your statements, You realize we are talking about the 3DS System?
If anything was to be true with what you said Why wouldn't they just make it a 3DSWare? Your arguments are completely invalid

Well DSIWARE still stands on the point

But yes your are right in the sense it would become 3DSWARE

the only way I will be proven wrong atm is when the game comes out.
Which will ask another question, if VC has had hardware access this entire time how come we have not seen a single game on store that gives this until now or at least on custom VC titles are we would have clearly discovered this ages ago

 

[Shubshub]

Well DSIWARE still stands on the point

But yes your are right in the sense it would become 3DSWARE

the only way I will be proven wrong atm is when the game comes out.
Which will ask another question, if VC has had hardware access this entire time how come we have not seen a single game on store that gives this until now or at least on custom VC titles are we would have clearly discovered this ages ago

You are proven wrong right here
The bottom screen clearly says Virtual Console

And Nintendo has Modified the VIRTUAL CONSOLE EMULATOR to support WIRELESS FUNCTIONALITY

/caseclosed I'm out

EDIT: Also stop going on about GBA it makes you sound like an idiot even though you are Because Pokemon is GB


/ontopic Yes I will definitely be using the features in the video

 

[izy]

Holy shit.. You are dense.. It's NOT a "port".. It was remade via the code they had for the GBA version to WORK AND TAKE ADVANTAGE of the things like the wireless functions. It isn't even relevant anyway. Why are you still going on about it?

Yeah and thats EXACTLY WHY ITS DSIWARE

if POKEMON is doing the same thing then like SHUBSHUB said it would be 3DSWARE, unless we have hardware access on GBA VC which has yet to been actually proven

 

[Kioku]

I actually feel bad because I've taken part in the derailment of something beautiful..

 

[VinsCool]

If I could clear the confusion about this for once and all:

Four Sword IS a DSIWARE, not a GBA game. It's a port of it.

These Pokémon games are eShop titles, just like any other Gameboy, Nes, Master System Virtual Console game.

 

[nolimits59]

I understand the whole statement, he's kinda right, GBA VC games a just emulated, they CAN'T use hardware that where not designed for the original console, at very least it could be mulated if the original console had such a thing... So it's a complet port to 3DS, and i think it will be based on the DSiware developement kit also, but it could be made in 3DS mode too.

 

[Shubshub]

I understand the whole statement, he's kinda right, GBA VC games a just emulated, they CAN'T use hardware that where not designed for the original console, at very least it could be mulated if the original console had such a thing... So it's a complet port to 3DS, and i think it will be based on the DSiware developement kit also, but it could be made in 3DS mode too.

VBA Emulator on PC has Over the Net Link Cable Emulation so why Can't nintendo put the same functionality into their Virtual Console program?

 

[Kioku]

VBA Emulator on PC has Over the Net Link Cable Emulation so why Can't nintendo put the same functionality into their Virtual Console program?

I blame the o3ds. When it hit, the actual performance was hit and miss. So, adding another function to it would have just lessened the experience. Not to mention the only gba VC games officially released were the ambassador only games.

 

[Shubshub]

I blame the o3ds. When it hit, the actual performance was hit and miss. So, adding another function to it would have just lessened the experience. Not to mention the only gba VC games officially released were the ambassador only games.

This is true, But Pokemon Red and Blue aren't GBA games also So I don't know why it was brought up originally in the first place
Simple answer is: They can and have implemented Link Cable emulation into the Virtual Console environment

Sorry to the OP for that kid that took it all offtopic


EDIT: So I don't have to make a new post

Because of the lack of security of the exchanges maybe ? Clones, bad exchanges thath happenend just because one contact was dirty ? Imagine that with the packet losses of WiFi... in there interest it's really a better solution to port the game and rebuild that system.

And a "pure game" offer better performances too, emulation is really not...

But Pokemon Red and Blue are very old Games and their communications methods are probably cracked wide open Why bother caring if its super duper secure?
Also we are talking about Wi-Fi where Pokemon games have supported it for Years now... What makes you think they'd forgo it just because of Lossy Packets now?

FinalEdit: Also as far as we know so far The VC games only have Wireless Local not Wireless Online

 

[nolimits59]

VBA Emulator on PC has Over the Net Link Cable Emulation so why Can't nintendo put the same functionality into their Virtual Console program?

Because of the lack of security of the exchanges maybe ? Clones, bad exchanges thath happenend just because one contact was dirty ? Imagine that with the packet losses of WiFi... in there interest it's really a better solution to port the game and rebuild that system.

And a "pure game" offer better performances too, emulation is really not...

 

[Kioku]

This is true, But Pokemon Red and Blue aren't GBA games also So I don't know why it was brought up originally in the first place
Simple answer is: They can and have implemented Link Cable emulation into the Virtual Console environment

Sorry to the OP for that kid that took it all offtopic

Well, of course.. But.. Outside of Pokémon, which games would have taken full advantage of the link?