I started thinking about how I came off in this thread and I feel bad. I came off too harsh. I was irritated at this whole situation. Me calling people idiots and such was disgusting of me. I felt shitty using language like that even if no one called it out. So I won't use that language anymore here.
No, it's called understanding character archs and traits, and the metaphors behind them because I have a pretty heavy grasp on the concept of storytelling. Anthropomorphic characters especially are an easy read because we liken human traits and personalities to these animals. Again, returning to the snake, why do you think every single snake character in any cartoon is up to something nefarious? Pepe could have been a chinchilla, but the joke wouldn't have worked because the metaphor wouldn't have fit. In the same sense, Bugs couldn't have been anything other than a rabbit because of the personality they assigned to the character derived from real life human traits. I couldn't give any less of a fuck whether or not the character stuck around. Me calling out his character traits isn't a complaint, it's an observation;
Call it observation or complaint or whatever other word you want to use, you still use the same words for the criticisms. Call a character dumb and say it's an observation is no different then you saying he's dumb but saying it as a complaint.
The difference between a complaint and a observation is usually the emotion attached to them, at least how it's used in a debate or argument. A complaint usually has a more negative feeling from the person where as an observation is usually more relaxed look at things. But it still doesn't change the root of the criticism.
A person usually says it's just an observation to let the other person know I'm more relaxed in my view of this situation and you are ridiculous for not being as relaxed as me. Because somehow showing more care and emotion in a debate is a loosing strategy. It ends up becoming a battle of who shows the most relaxed emotion, and who ever shows the most relaxed emotion wins the debate, and it becomes less about the actual content of the debate they were talking about.
something you seem incapable of doing what with your complaining about complainers.
I don't understand the complaining about complainers part. You have to make an observation first before you make a complaint. Which then goes back to my above paragraphs which is the way you are using those words, you are using them based on the emotion attachment to them. Whether or not someone is ticked off is irrelevant to the main points they bring up. What they say matters more then the emotion behind what they say.
And yet here you are arguing whether or not a fictional character is a literal rapist because you don't know what a metaphor is. Nobody's called him a rapist. He just kinda, y'know, represents one. That's what a metaphor is.
He is being cancelled. A cartoon character being cancelled. The whole point of this thread. People are taking this more then just a metaphors or observation. They are taking action. There is outrage at this character.
Trying to go after a cartoon character from a comedy show that is the butt of the joke is ridiculous. And yet no one goes after Penelope for the same behaviors. And people are taking this character way to seriously and are canceling it, that's what annoyed me. Its just a comedy cartoon. And me talking angrily about it earlier is not the same as them or the same in seriousness as them because I am not canceling or wanting the character cancelled. That's the difference.