Microsoft releases the source code for MS-DOS v4.0 on GitHub

msdos-logo.png

MS-DOS (MicroSoft Disk Operating System) was without a doubt one of the most pivotal operating systems back in the 80s and early 90s, with the very same operating system paving the way in user base and popularity into what we now know as Microsoft Windows, with MS-DOS even being included into initial releases of Windows 95, and still being supported up to the year 2000, with the final releases being alongside Windows ME.

Given the importance of the operating system in computer history, Microsoft originally released the source code for versions v1.25 and v2.0 of MS-DOS to their GitHub repository, making them open source, back in 2018, which according to Microsoft it was mainly done for education and experimentation for low-lever software programmers.

In April 25th, 2024, Microsoft has released yet another version of MS-DOS into their public repository, with the latest version to be included and publicly available being v4.0.

The current open source repository for MS-DOS works under the MIT license, and has been archived and marked for historical reference, so Microsoft will not accept any kind of pull requests nor modifications to the files on their repository, but users are able to fork the open source MS-DOS project and experiment on their own.

MS-DOS still has newer versions yet to become open source, since it goes all the way up to version v7.0 for Windows 95, and the last version known being v8.0 releases alongside WIndows ME, but until Microsoft decides, versions v5.0 up to v8.0 still remain as closed source.

:arrow: Source
 

tech3475

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
3,954
Trophies
2
XP
6,590
Country
I hope they get around to 6.22 at some point, especially if it improves Win 3.11 support on FreeDOS, etc.

Very nice of them to release an obsolete code

Would you prefer it if they kept it closed source?

Obsolete but potentially still useful to the fine folks at DosBox and similar emulators. There are plenty of old games for MS DOS that are still worth playing today.

There's also still people who mess around with 8088 based hardware, so potentially still useful for tinkering.
 

Latiodile

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 27, 2022
Messages
585
Trophies
0
Location
Ontario
XP
1,752
Country
Canada
I hope they get around to 6.22 at some point, especially if it improves Win 3.11 support on FreeDOS, etc.
considering it took them 10 years to release anything newer than 1.25 and 2.0, we'll be waiting a good 10-20 years before they release 6.22, or even 5.0
 

The Real Jdbye

*is birb*
Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
23,738
Trophies
5
Location
Space
XP
14,642
Country
Norway
Obviously this code is useless nowadays, but it's pretty cool to be able to look at the source code of a piece of history.
I wonder if there are any funny comments. Might have a look myself.
 

tech3475

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
3,954
Trophies
2
XP
6,590
Country
Is there anything in 6.22 that FreeDOS can't do? :unsure:

Off the top of my head, last I looked it doesn't support 386 enhanced mode on Windows 3.11.

May not be necessary but I like having it and occasionally use the odd piece of software on it.
 

Latiodile

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 27, 2022
Messages
585
Trophies
0
Location
Ontario
XP
1,752
Country
Canada
If i had a nickel everytime the source code of something related to ms dos got released i'd have two nickels. Which isn't a lot, but it's weird that it happened twice.
The first one is Doom
the source code for doom, quake, dos 1.25 and 2.0 are available, it happened more than twice lol
you failed at this meme
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Xdqwerty

linuxares

The inadequate, autocratic beast!
Global Moderator
Joined
Aug 5, 2007
Messages
14,192
Trophies
3
XP
20,103
Country
Sweden
  • Like
Reactions: DinohScene

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    I have an idea for a new lord of the rings series
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    Simpson's did it...
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Elon as frodo
    +1
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    The Twitter/X hat determines your fate. (oh wait, wrong movie)
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    You must never wear the blue check mark
    +1
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    I wonder how many Broncos fans cellphones Kelsy's brother will smash today.
  • DragonMals @ DragonMals:
    he's
  • Faust03 @ Faust03:
    twitter is a very toxic website
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Nuh uh
  • DragonMals @ DragonMals:
    An underrated opinion: While Bluesky as a platform is better than Twitter, Bluesky's userbase won't be better than Twitter as people are saying because everyone from the non-bootleg site are moving to the bootleg one expecting for themselves to change with their attitude, but that never works like that.
  • DragonMals @ DragonMals:
    I will say though: Bluesky as a micro-blogging site? Needs a bit more oomph and I would officially like it better than Twiter. Can't even post gifs on that site, like what the fuck?
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Diarrhea is toxic
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    Can you post milfs though?
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Gilfs
    +2
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    Kilfs. (Ken knows)
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Gay
    +1
  • NinStar @ NinStar:
    fake and gay
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Fake news is hot
  • realtimesave @ realtimesave:
    hey guyz
    +2
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    @realtimesave, I'm here. Why?
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    Have you found anywhere else to sell your Switch OLED?
    SylverReZ @ SylverReZ: Have you found anywhere else to sell your Switch OLED?